Exploration of optimal dosing regimens of haloperidol, a D2 Antagonist, via modeling and simulation analysis in a D2 receptor occupancy study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the potential usage of D(2) receptor occupancy (D2RO) measured by positron emission tomography (PET) in antipsychotic development. METHODS: In this randomized, parallel group study, eight healthy male volunteers received oral doses of 0.5 (n = 3), 1 (n = 2), or 3 mg (n = 3) of haloperidol once daily for 7 days. PET's were scanned before haloperidol, and on days 8, 12, with serial pharmacokinetic sampling on day 7. Pharmacokinetics and binding potential to D(2) receptor in putamen and caudate nucleus over time were analyzed using NONMEM, and simulations for the profiles of D2RO over time on various regimens of haloperidol were conducted to find the optimal dosing regimens. RESULTS: One compartment model with a saturable binding compartment, and inhibitory E(max) model in the effect compartment best described the data. Plasma haloperidol concentrations at half-maximal inhibition were 0.791 and 0.650 ng/ml, in putamen and caudate nucleus. Simulation suggested haloperidol 2 mg every 12 h is near the optimal dose. CONCLUSION: This study showed that sparse D2RO measurements in steady state pharmacodynamic design after multiple dosing could reveal the possibility of treatment effect of D(2) antagonist, and could identify the potential optimal doses for later clinical studies by modeling and simulation.

Assessment of the influence of severe renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of mirodenafil in Korean male volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of a single oral dose of mirodenafil in volunteer patients with severe renal impairment and healthy volunteers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This open-label, single-dose, parallel group clinical study enrolled a total 12 volunteers (6 healthy volunteers and 6 volunteer patients with severe renal impairment). Each volunteer was orally administered 50 mg mirodenafil and serial blood samples were obtained after drug administration to determine the plasma concentration of mirodenafil using LC-MS/MS. The measured individual plasma concentrations were used to calculate the pharmacokinetic parameters using noncompartmental methods. Tolerability was also assessed using measurements of vital signs, clinical chemistry tests, and interviews. RESULTS: All of the volunteers completed the study with no serious adverse events (AEs). A total of 4 AEs were reported, but all were of mild or moderate intensity and not considered to be related to the study drug. The geometric mean (95% CI) of the terminal half-life (t1/2ß) and the apparent clearance (CL/F) values of mirodenafil were 2.2 (1.4 - 3.4) h and 127.2 (95.1 - 170.2) l/h in the volunteer patients, and 3.0 (2.1 - 4.4) h and 136.1 (74.4 - 249.2) l/h in the healthy volunteers, respectively. The geometric mean of the AUC0-t of the volunteer patients was 8% higher and the geometric mean for clearance was 7% lower compared with the healthy volunteers. However, the geometric mean of the Cmax of the volunteer patients was 38% higher than that of the healthy volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: A single oral 50-mg dose of mirodenafil was well tolerated. Exposure (AUC0-t) to mirodenafil was similar in both healthy volunteers and volunteer patients with severe renal impairment and healthy volunteers.