Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Otol Neurotol ; 44(7): 709-717, 2023 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37400140

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To identify differences in mean cost per patient between the Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery (MIPS) and the linear incision technique with tissue preservation (LITT-P). STUDY DESIGN: Health economic cost analysis. SETTING: The analysis was performed in a randomized multicenter controlled trial cohort. PATIENTS: Adult patients eligible for unilateral bone conduction device surgery. INTERVENTIONS: MIPS versus LITT-P surgery for bone conduction device implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perioperative and postoperative costs were identified and compared. RESULTS: The difference in mean cost per patient between both techniques was €77.83 in favor of the MIPS after 22 months follow-up. The mean costs per patient were lower in the MIPS cohort for surgery (€145.68), outpatient visits (€24.27), systemic antibiotic therapy with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (€0.30) or clindamycin (€0.40), abutment change (€0.36), and abutment removal (€0.18). The mean costs per patient were higher for implant and abutment set (€18.00), topical treatment with hydrocortison/oxytetracycline/polymyxine B (€0.43), systemic therapy with azithromycin (€0.09) or erythromycin (€1.15), local revision surgery (€1.45), elective explantation (€1.82), and implant extrusion (€70.42). Additional analysis of scenarios in which all patients were operated under general or local anesthesia or with recalculation when using current implant survival rates showed that differences in mean cost per patient were also in favor of the MIPS. CONCLUSION: The difference between the MIPS and the LITT-P in mean cost per patient was €77.83 in favor of the MIPS after 22 months of follow-up. The MIPS is an economically responsible technique and could be promising for the future.


Assuntos
Condução Óssea , Auxiliares de Audição , Adulto , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Custos e Análise de Custo
2.
Trials ; 17(1): 540, 2016 11 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27829464

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Over the last years, less invasive surgical techniques with soft tissue preservation for bone conduction hearing implants (BCHI) have been introduced such as the linear incision technique combined with a punch. Results using this technique seem favorable in terms of rate of peri-abutment dermatitis (PAD), esthetics, and preservation of skin sensibility. Recently, a new standardized surgical technique for BCHI placement, the Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery (MIPS) technique has been developed by Oticon Medical AB (Askim, Sweden). This technique aims to standardize surgery by using a novel surgical instrumentation kit and minimize soft tissue trauma. METHODS: A multicenter randomized controlled trial is designed to compare the MIPS technique to the linear incision technique with soft tissue preservation. The primary investigation center is Maastricht University Medical Center. Sixty-two participants will be included with a 2-year follow-up period. Parameters are introduced to quantify factors such as loss of skin sensibility, dehiscence of the skin next to the abutment, skin overgrowth, and cosmetic results. A new type of sampling method is incorporated to aid in the estimation of complications. To gain further understanding of PAD, swabs and skin biopsies are collected during follow-up visits for evaluation of the bacterial profile and inflammatory cytokine expression. The primary objective of the study is to compare the incidence of PAD during the first 3 months after BCHI placement. Secondary objectives include the assessment of parameters related to surgery, wound healing, pain, loss of sensibility of the skin around the implant, implant extrusion rate, implant stability measurements, dehiscence of the skin next to the abutment, and esthetic appeal. Tertiary objectives include assessment of other factors related to PAD and a health economic evaluation. DISCUSSION: This is the first trial to compare the recently developed MIPS technique to the linear incision technique with soft tissue preservation for BCHI surgery. Newly introduced parameters and sampling method will aid in the prediction of results and complications after BCHI placement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at the CCMO register in the Netherlands on 24 November 2014: NL50072.068.14 . Retrospectively registered on 21 April 2015 at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02438618 . This trial is sponsored by Oticon Medical AB.


Assuntos
Condução Óssea , Auxiliares de Audição , Perda Auditiva/cirurgia , Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva/reabilitação , Protocolos Clínicos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Dermatite/etiologia , Desenho de Equipamento , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Auxiliares de Audição/economia , Perda Auditiva/diagnóstico , Perda Auditiva/fisiopatologia , Perda Auditiva/psicologia , Humanos , Países Baixos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otológicos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otológicos/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otológicos/instrumentação , Satisfação do Paciente , Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva/psicologia , Projetos de Pesquisa , Fatores de Risco , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória , Âncoras de Sutura , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Cicatrização
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA