Assessment of occupational exposure and spectrum of contact sensitization in metalworkers with occupational dermatitis: results of a cohort study within the OCCUDERM project.

BACKGROUND: Metalworkers occupationally exposed to metals, tools, metalworking fluids (MWFs), technical oils, gloves, skin care products etc. frequently suffer from occupational dermatitis (OD). OBJECTIVES: To investigate occupational exposure and to identify relevant occupational sensitizers in metalworkers with OD, and to evaluate suitability of current German patch test recommendations for this occupational group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: As part of the OCCUDERM project, occupational exposure of 230 metalworkers with suspected OD patch tested in the departments of dermatology in Göttingen and Osnabrück (both Lower Saxony, Germany) in 2012-2017 was recorded by questionnaire. These data, as well as results, of patch testing with standardized allergens and with workplace material were analysed. RESULTS: Metalworking fluids and skin care products were the most important exposures. Among MWF allergens, most frequently sensitizations to formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers, colophony/abietic acid and monoethanolamine were observed. Sensitization to methylisothiazolinone (MI) was frequent, probably as part of the general European epidemic of contact allergy to MI in leave-on cosmetics. Sensitization to glove ingredients only played a minor role. CONCLUSIONS: The known occupational allergen spectrum could largely be confirmed. In order not to miss relevant sensitizations, patch testing with material from the patients' workplaces in parallel to baseline and MWF series is recommended. Sensitizations diagnosed could not always be linked to particular occupational exposures.

Decreasing sunbed use in the German population between 2001 and 2015: survey in 155 679 working persons.

BACKGROUND: UV radiation is a proven cause of skin cancer. Use of sunbeds has been shown to provide an attributable risk. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the proportion of regular sunbed use in Germany based on large-scale population-based surveys over 15 years. METHODS: Skin cancer screenings by dermatologists were conducted between 2001 and 2015 in more than 500 German companies, including a clinical examination and interviews on the risk behaviour related to sunburns and sunbeds. RESULTS: Among 155 679 persons included regular sunbed use significantly declined from 11.0% in 2001 to 1.6% in 2015 (P < 0.001). There were significantly higher rates of sunbed use in women (12.5%/2.0%) vs. men (7.3%/1.3%; P < 0.001), in younger persons and in participants with darker skin (type II and III) vs. fair skin (type I). Individuals with sunburns in childhood were significantly more often sunbed users (5.1% vs. 4.6%; P = 0.002). A remarkable decline of sunbed use was observed after 2009 (7.0% in 2001-2008 and 2.2% in 2009-2015). This reduction occurred in the time of a legal ban of sunbed use for minors but also with the start of the national skin cancer screening programme. CONCLUSION: Use of sunbeds in the German adult population has dropped by more than 85% in the past decade. Primary prevention, including the large public awareness following the legal ban of sunbed use for young people and the effects of the statutory skin cancer screening programme may have contributed to this.

The implementation of knowledge dissemination in the prevention of occupational skin diseases.

BACKGROUND: Occupational skin diseases (OSD) have a high medical, social, economic and political impact. Knowledge dissemination from research activities to key stakeholders involved in health care is a prerequisite to make prevention effective. OBJECTIVES: To study and prioritize different activity fields and stakeholders that are involved in the prevention of OSD, to reflect on their inter-relationships, to develop a strategic approach for knowledge dissemination and to develop a hands-on tool for OSD prevention projects METHODS: Seven different activity fields that are relevant in the prevention of OSD have been stepwise identified. This was followed by an impact analysis. Fifty-five international OSD experts rated the impact and the influence of the activity fields for the prevention of OSD with a standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: Activity fields identified to have a high impact in OSD prevention are the political system, mass media and industry. The political system has a strong but more indirect effect on the general population via the educational system, local public health services or the industry. The educational system, mass media, industry and local public health services have a strong direct impact on the OSD 'at risk' worker. Finally, a hands-on tool for future OSD prevention projects has been developed that addresses knowledge dissemination and different stakeholder needs. CONCLUSION: Systematic knowledge dissemination is important to make OSD prevention more effective and to close the gap between research and practice. This study provides guidance to identify stakeholders, strategies and dissemination channels for systematic knowledge dissemination which need to be adapted to country-specific structures, for example the social security system and healthcare systems. A key for successful knowledge dissemination is building linkages among different stakeholders, building strategic partnerships and gaining their support right from the inception phase of a project.

Minimum standards on prevention, diagnosis and treatment of occupational and work-related skin diseases in Europe - position paper of the COST Action StanDerm (TD 1206).

BACKGROUND: Skin diseases constitute up to 40% of all notified occupational diseases in most European countries, predominantly comprising contact dermatitis, contact urticaria, and skin cancer. While insufficient prevention of work-related skin diseases (WRSD) is a top-priority problem in Europe, common standards for prevention of these conditions are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To develop common European standards on prevention and management of WRSD and occupational skin diseases (OSD). METHOD: Consensus amongst experts within occupational dermatology was achieved with regard to the definition of minimum evidence-based standards on prevention and management of WRSD/OSD. RESULTS: By definition, WRSDs/OSDs are (partially or fully) caused by occupational exposure. The definition of OSD sensu stricto additionally includes diverging national legal requirements, with an impact on registration, prevention, management, and compensation. With the implementation of the classification of WRSD/OSD in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 11th Revision in future, a valid surveillance and comparability across countries will be possible. Currently, WRDS and OSD are still under-reported. Depending on legislation and regulations, huge differences exist in notification procedures in Europe, although notification is crucial to prevent chronic and relapsing disease. Facilities for early diagnosis, essential for individual patient management, should be based on existing guidelines and include a multidisciplinary approach. Patch testing is essential if contact dermatitis persists or relapses. Workplace exposure assessment of WRSD/OSD requires full labelling of product ingredients on material safety data sheets helping to identify allergens, irritants and skin carcinogens. Comparable standards in primary, secondary and tertiary prevention must be established in Europe to reduce the burden of WRSD/OSD in Europe. CONCLUSION: The adoption of common European standards on prevention of WRSD/OSD will contribute to reduce the incidence of OSD and their socio-economic burden.

["With all suitable means". Off-label-use and public statutory employers' liability insurance]. / "Mit allen geeigneten Mitteln". Off-label-Use und Berufsgenossenschaften.

In Germany, responsibility for treatment of occupational diseases lies with the public statutory employers' liability insurances (SELI). According to their legal obligation SELI have to ascertain cure--wherever possible--"with all suitable means". Thus, dermatologists treating patients with occupational dermatoses are required to deliver the best possible therapy, which, according to the current scientific knowledge, may in some cases be off-label. For example, in occupational contact dermatitis a number of scientifically promising topical and systemic drugs are not yet licensed for this indication. Off-label prescribing is not prohibited and there are no laws limiting physician flexibility in such prescribing. SELI also allows the use of off-label drugs. The goals of optimal treatment or effective prevention of occupational disease determine the measures which can be employed. Off-label use is approved for occupational skin diseases when the medication is required for cure or prevention and its use meets generally accepted medical standards. In these cases, SELI will cover off-label drug prescriptions. However, detailed patient counseling and informed consent are mandatory.

[New dermatologist's procedure. Research plans for improving secondary prevention of occupational dermatoses]. / Das neue Hautarztverfahren. Forschungsvorhaben zur Verbesserung der Sekundärprävention von Berufsdermatosen.

The dermatologist's procedure was introduced in 1972 by employers' liability insurance funds in the industrial, agricultural, and public sectors of Germany's statutory occupational accident insurance as a "procedure for early detection of occupational skin diseases." So far, it is still the most relevant tool for secondary prevention in occupational dermatology in Germany. According to the intention of this procedure, insured persons with a skin disease in which an occupational etiology is suspected must be offered preventive measures and, if necessary, given appropriate treatment to avoid job-loss. To improve the efficiency of the "classic" dermatologist's procedure, in 1999, on the initiative of the Central Federation of Industrial Professional Associations, a study group was founded in cooperation with the Task Force on Occupational and Environmental Dermatology of the German Dermatological Society and the Professional Organisation of German Dermatologists. In October 2002, a controlled intervention study started in North-western Germany to scientifically evaluate the "optimised" dermatologist's procedure, which was proposed by the study group and compare it to the standard ("classic") procedure. The study results should allow detailed suggestions for an improved dermatologist's procedure before it is introduced nationwide.

Percentage of anaesthetic fee refunded to patients by schedule-using private medical insurers in New Zealand.

Refunds for anaesthetic services payable to patients by schedule-using private medical insurers or agencies have not been realistically adjusted for inflation or growth in incomes. Patients receive a lower actual refund than that usually implied by the insurers. If private anaesthetic fees had increased in line with award weekly wages, the average refund to patients would have been approximately 50% for most of the period 1968-1981.