Disparities in Patient Reported Outcome Measure Completion Rates and Baseline Function in Newly Presenting Spine Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Review. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate disparities in patient reported outcome measures (PROM) completion rates and baseline function scores among newly presenting spine patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Prior studies have demonstrated that minority patients and those of low socioeconomic status may present with worse physical and mental health on PROMs. As PROMs are increasingly used in clinical care, research, and health policy, accurate assessment of health status among populations relies on the successful completion of PROM instruments. METHODS: A retrospective review of 10,803 consecutive new patients presenting to a single multidisciplinary spine clinic from June 2020 to September 2022 was performed. Univariate statistics were performed to compare demographics between patients who did and did not complete PROMs. Multivariable analysis was used to compare PROM instrument completion rates by race, ethnicity, and Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and baseline scores among responders. RESULTS: 68.4% of patients completed PROMs at the first clinic visit. After adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, and diagnosis type, patients of non-white race (OR=0.661, 95%-CI=0.599-0.729, P<0.001), Hispanic ethnicity (OR=0.569, 95%-CI=0.448-0.721, P<0.001), and increased social vulnerability (OR=0.608, 95%-CI=0.511-0.723, P<0.001) were less likely to complete PROMs. In the multivariable models, patients of non-white race reported lower levels of physical function (ß=-6.5, 95%-CI=-12.4 to -0.6, P=0.032) and higher levels of pain intensity (ß=0.6, 95%-CI=0.2-1.0, P=0.005). Hispanic ethnicity (ß=1.5, 95%-CI=0.5-2.5, P=0.004) and increased social vulnerability (ß=1.1, 95%-CI=0.4-1.8, P=0.002) were each associated with increased pain intensity. CONCLUSION: Among newly presenting spine patients, those of non-white race, Hispanic ethnicity, and with increased social vulnerability were less likely to complete PROMs. As these subpopulations also reported worse physical function or pain intensity, additional strategies are needed to better capture patient reported health status in order to avoid bias in clinical care, outcomes research and health policy.

Social Determinants of Health in Maryland Hip Arthroscopy Patients.

Background Prior studies have demonstrated racial and socioeconomic disparities in patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) completion rates, and improvement exists across multiple orthopedic conditions. The purpose of this study was to assess whether these disparities are present in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy (HA) procedures. Methods A retrospective study of 306 patients undergoing HA from 2021 to 2023 was performed. Social determinants of health (SDOH) were compared between HA patients and the general Maryland population. Patients were then classified by whether they completed baseline and six-month PROMs (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) instrument). Patients who completed PROMIS-PF were classified by whether or not they achieved minimal clinically important difference (MCID) at six months. Demographics and SDOH were compared using univariate analyses between patients who did and did not complete PROMs and between those who did and did not achieve MCID. SDOH were evaluated at the zip-code level using regional health information exchange measures. Results Compared to the Maryland population, HA patients resided in areas of lower social vulnerability. Preoperative and six-month PROMs were completed by 102 (33%) patients. No significant differences in demographics or any SDOH were found between patients who did and did not complete PROMs. Six-month MCID was achieved in 75 of 102 (74%) patients with complete PROMs; no significant differences in demographics or SDOH were observed between patients who did and did not achieve MCID. Conclusions For patients undergoing HA, disparities in patient-reported outcome completion rates and postoperative functional improvement do not appear to be present across demographics and SDOH, indicating equitable care is being delivered.

Social vulnerability adversely affects emergency-department utilization but not patient-reported outcomes after total joint arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple studies demonstrate social deprivation is associated with inferior outcomes after total hip (THA) and total knee (TKA) arthroplasty; its effect on patient-reported outcomes is debated. The primary objective of this study evaluated the relationship between social vulnerability and the PROMIS-PF measure in patients undergoing THA and TKA. A secondary aim compared social vulnerability between patients who required increased resource utilization or experienced complications and those who didn't. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 537 patients from March 2020 to February 2022 was performed. The Centers for Disease Control Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) were used to quantify socioeconomic disadvantage. The cohort was split into THA and TKA populations; univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate primary and secondary outcomes. Statistical significance was assessed at p < 0.05. RESULTS: 48.6% of patients achieved PROMIS-PF MCID at 1-year postoperatively. Higher levels of overall social vulnerability (0.40 vs. 0.28, p = 0.03) were observed in TKA patients returning to the ED within 90-days of discharge. Increased overall SVI (OR = 9.18, p = 0.027) and household characteristics SVI (OR = 9.57, p = 0.015) were independent risk factors for 90-day ED returns after TKA. In THA patients, increased vulnerability in the household type and transportation dimension was observed in patients requiring 90-day ED returns (0.51 vs. 0.37, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Despite an increased risk for 90-day ED returns, patients with increased social vulnerability still obtain good 1-year functional outcomes. Initiatives seeking to mitigate the effect of social deprivation on TJA outcomes should aim to provide safe alternatives to ED care during early recovery.

Disparities in Hand Surgery Exist in Unexpected Populations.

Background The purpose of our study is to investigate disparities in the patient populations and outcomes of carpal tunnel release (CTR) and trigger finger release (TFR).  Methods A retrospective review of 777 CTR and 395 TFR patients from May 2021 to August 2022 was completed. The shortened form of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores (QuickDASH) was recorded to evaluate physical function preoperatively and at one and three months postoperatively. This study was deemed institutional review board-exempt by the institutional clinical research committee. Results Compared to CTR, TFR patients resided in zip codes with higher levels of social vulnerability across dimensions of 'household composition and disability' (p=0.018) and 'minority status and language' (p=0.043). When analyzing QuickDASH scores by demographics and procedure, preoperative scores were statistically significantly higher for non-married (p=0.002), White (p=0.003), and female sex (p=0.001) CTR patients. Further, one-month postoperative scores were statistically higher for White and non-married CTR patients (0.016 and 0.015, respectively). At three months postoperatively, female and non-married patients had statistically significant higher scores (0.010 and 0.037, respectively). In TFR patients, one-month postoperative QuickDASH scores for White and female patients were statistically significantly higher (0.018 and 0.007, respectively). There were no significant differences in QuickDASH scores between rural and non-rural patients, household income (HHI) above or below the median, or the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) dimensions.  Conclusion Our study found marital status, sex, and race were associated with disparities in pre-and postoperative physical function in patients undergoing carpal tunnel or trigger finger release. However, future studies are warranted to confirm and develop solutions to disparities within this population.

Outpatient physical therapy bundled payment models are feasible for total hip arthroplasty patients: an evaluation of utilization, cost and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Various episode-of-care bundled payment models for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty have been implemented. However, participation in bundled payment programs has dropped given the challenges of meeting continually lower target prices. The purpose of our study is to investigate the cost of outpatient physical therapy (PT) and the potential for stand-alone outpatient PT bundled payments for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: A retrospective review of 501 patients who underwent primary unilateral THA from November 2017 to February 2020 was performed. All patients included in this study received postoperative PT care at a single hospital-affiliated PT practice. Patients above the 75th percentile of therapy visits were then classified as high-PT utilizers and compared with the rest of the population using univariate statistics. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the predictors of high therapy utilization. RESULTS: Patients averaged 65 ± 10 years of age and a BMI of 29 ± 5 kg/m2. Overall, 80% of patients were white and 53% were female. The average patient had 11 ± 8 total therapy sessions in 42 days: one initial evaluation, one re-evaluation and 9 standard sessions. High-PT utilizers incurred estimated average costs of $1934 ± 431 per patient, compared to $783 ± 432 (P < 0.001) in the rest of the population. Further, no significant differences in 90-day outcomes including lower extremity functional scale scores, emergency department returns, readmissions, or returns to the operating room were observed between high utilizers and the rest of the population (all P > 0.08). In the multivariate analysis, women (OR = 1.68, P = 0.017) and those with sleep apnea (OR = 2.02, P = 0.012) were nearly twice as likely to be high utilizers, while white patients were 42% less likely to be high utilizers than patients of other races (OR = 0.58, P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient PT utilization is highly variable in patients undergoing THA. However, despite using more services and incurring increased cost, patients in the top quartile of utilization experienced similar outcomes to the rest of the population. If outpatient therapy bundles are to be developed, 16 visits appear to be a reasonable target for pricing, given this provides adequate coverage for 75% of THA patients.

Racial Disparities in Outcomes of Total Joint Arthroplasty at a Single Institution: Have We Made Progress?

Background: Health disparities disproportionately affect minority groups across the United States with respect to care access, quality, and outcomes. The aim of this study is to examine existing disparities between white and African American (AA) patients regarding postoperative outcomes following total joint arthroplasty and provide insight into disparity trends over a 9-year period. Methods: A retrospective review of 16,779 total joint arthroplasty patients at a single institution between January 2013 and December 2021 was performed. Patients were grouped by race as AA or white. Outcomes of interest included length of stay (LOS), home discharge, 30-day emergency department return, and 30-day readmission. Univariate statistics and multivariate regressions were utilized to analyze results. Results: Significant improvements in LOS and rates of home discharge occurred for both white and AA patients at our institution over a 9-year period, while rates of 30-day emergency department returns and readmissions demonstrated a downward but non-statistically significant trend. Despite these trends, AA patients continued to experience longer lengths of stay, less likelihood of 0- or 1-day LOS, and higher risk of nonhome discharge for most years examined. However, after controlling for demographic and comorbidity differences, the differences between groups narrowed over time resulting in no significant differences in the aforementioned 3 measures by 2021. Conclusions: Although racial disparities in outcomes are still apparent, over time, the differences in resource utilization between AA and white patients have narrowed. Initiatives aimed at creating healthier communities with increased access to care and the ultimate goal of equitable care must continue to be pursued.

Racial disparities in outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A propensity score matched analysis using multiple national data sets.

BACKGROUND: Disparities in access, utilization and outcomes exist throughout the healthcare system for minority groups, including racial and ethnic minorities; these disparities have wide-reaching implications for individuals as well as the healthcare system as a whole. This study will examine the impact of race on short and medium term outcomes for patients undergoing rotator cuff repair (RCR) using matched cohorts. METHODS: Patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair from 2016 to 2018 were extracted from two national databases: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) and TriNetX Research Network. Using the ACS-NSQIP database, univariate analysis was performed to identify differences in comorbidities between white and minority patients. Patients were propensity score matched based on significant differences between groups and 30-day postoperative outcomes were assessed. These comorbidities were then used to propensity score match white and minority patients in the TriNetX database and two-year postoperative outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Following propensity score matching, 3716 patients remained in each group from the ACS-NSQIP database and 4185 patients remained in each group from the TriNetX database. The OR time for minority patients was longer than white patient in the ACS-NSQIP database (92.2 vs. 87.6 min, p < .001). There was no difference in medium-term outcomes for repeat RCR, infection or frozen shoulder between white and minority patients in the TriNetX database. CONCLUSION: After propensity score matching the only significant short-term outcome between white and minority patients undergoing RCR was a difference in OR time; there were no differences in medium-term outcomes. This may indicate that the source of racial disparities is one of access to healthcare rather than an innate difference in the patients' outcomes. Further study is needed to elucidate this issue.