Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: FDG PET/MRI and CT Tumor Metrics for Assessment of Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy and Prediction of Survival.

BACKGROUND. Imaging biomarkers of response to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) are needed to optimize treatment decisions and long-term outcomes. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to investigate metrics from PET/MRI and CT to assess pathologic response of PDA to NAT and to predict overall survival (OS). METHODS. This retrospective study included 44 patients with 18F-FDG-avid borderline resectable or locally advanced PDA on pretreatment PET/MRI who also underwent post-NAT PET/MRI before surgery between August 2016 and February 2019. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) level, metabolic metrics from PET/MRI, and morphologic metrics from CT (n = 34) were compared between pathologic responders (College of American Pathologists scores 0 and 1) and nonresponders (scores 2 and 3). AUCs were measured for metrics significantly associated with pathologic response. Relation to OS was evaluated with Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS. Among 44 patients (22 men, 22 women; mean age, 62 ± 11.6 years), 19 (43%) were responders, and 25 (57%) were nonresponders. Median OS was 24 months (range, 6-42 months). Before treatment, responders and nonresponders did not differ in CA 19-9 level, metabolic metrics, or CT metrics (p > .05). After treatment, responders and nonresponders differed in complete metabolic response (CMR) (responders, 89% [17/19]; nonresponders, 40% [10/25]; p = .04], mean change in SUVmax (ΔSUVmax; responders, -70% ± 13%; nonresponders, -37% ± 42%; p < .001), mean change in SUVmax corrected to serum glucose level (ΔSUVgluc) (responders, -74% ± 12%; nonresponders, -30% ± 58%; p < .001), RECIST response on CT (responders, 93% [13/14]; nonresponders, 50% [10/20]; p = .02)], and mean change in tumor volume on CT (ΔTvol) (responders, -85% ± 21%; nonresponders, 57% ± 400%; p < .001). The AUC of CMR for pathologic response was 0.75; ΔSUVmax, 0.83; ΔSUVgluc, 0.87; RECIST, 0.71; and ΔTvol 0.86. The AUCs of bivariable PET/MRI and CT models were 0.83 (CMR and ΔSUVmax), 0.87 (CMR and ΔSUVgluc), and 0.87 (RECIST and ΔTvol). OS was associated with CMR (p = .03), ΔSUVmax (p = .003), ΔSUVgluc (p = .003), and RECIST (p = .046). CONCLUSION. Unlike CA 19-9 level, changes in metabolic metrics from PET/MRI and morphologic metrics from CT after NAT were associated with pathologic response and OS in patients with PDA, warranting prospective validation. CLINICAL IMPACT. Imaging metrics associated with pathologic response and OS in PDA could help guide clinical management and outcomes for patients with PDA who undergo emergency therapeutic interventions.

Positron emission tomography objective parameters for assessment of left ventricular assist device infection using 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is a life-saving therapy, but it poses a substantial infection risk. Current evaluation of LVAD infection with 18F-FDG PET/CT is predominately subjective. We present qualitative and semi-quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters for early detection of LVAD infection and site localization. We retrospectively reviewed all 25 LVAD patients at our institution who had undergone 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging between 2014 and 2018. LVADs were subdivided into five assessed regions: driveline exit site, subcutaneous driveline, LVAD pump, LVAD inflow, and LVAD outflow cannulae. Ultimate diagnosis of LVAD infection was determined by a multidisciplinary primary care team. Qualitative and semi-quantitative analysis of PET/CT data were performed, including calculation of the standardized uptake value maximum, mean, and peak (SUVmax, SUVmean, and SUVpeak, respectively), as well as metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). A total of 14 patients presented with symptoms of infection, and LVAD infection was ultimately diagnosed in 19 of the 25 cases. All cases were correctly identified on 18F-FDG PET/CT with no false positive and no false negative cases, corresponding to a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. The mean SUVmax range at noninfected sites was 2.5-3.4, and the range was 5.7-8.1 at infected sites, resulting in a significant difference (P < 0.01) at all LVAD regions. 18F-FDG PET/CT is a useful adjunctive tool for assessment of LVAD infection and infection localization, which is crucial for clinical management. A cut-off SUVmax 5 is recommended to help diagnose LVAD infection.