Trends in American Indian/Alaskan native self-reported stroke prevalence and associated modifiable risk factors in the United States from 2011-2021.

BACKGROUND: Stroke prevalence varies by race/ethnicity, as do the risk factors that elevate the risk of stroke. Prior analyses have suggested that American Indian/Alaskan Natives (AI/AN) have higher rates of stroke and vascular risk factors. METHODS: We included biyearly data from the 2011-2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) surveys of adults (age ≥18) in the United States. We describe survey-weighted prevalence of stroke per self-report by race and ethnicity. In patients with self-reported stroke (SRS), we also describe the prevalence of modifiable vascular risk factors. RESULTS: The weighted number of U.S. participants represented in BRFSS surveys increased from 237,486,646 in 2011 to 245,350,089 in 2021. SRS prevalence increased from 2.9% in 2011 to 3.3% in 2021 (p<0.001). Amongst all race/ethnicity groups, the prevalence of stroke was highest in AI/AN at 5.4% and 5.6% in 2011 and 2021, compared to 3.0% and 3.4% for White adults (p<0.001). AI/AN with SRS were also the most likely to have four or more vascular risk factors in both 2011 and 2021 at 23.9% and 26.4% compared to 18.2% and 19.6% in White adults (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: From 2011-2021 in the United States, AI/AN consistently had the highest prevalence of self-reported stroke and highest overall burden of modifiable vascular risk factors. This persistent health disparity leaves AI/AN more susceptible to both incident and recurrent stroke.

Seven Strategies to Integrate Equity within Translational Research in Neurology.

The rapidly accelerating translation of biomedical advances is leading to revolutionary therapies that are often inaccessible to historically marginalized populations. We identified and synthesized recent guidelines and statements to propose 7 strategies to integrate equity within translational research in neurology: (1) learn history; (2) learn about upstream forces; (3) diversify and liberate; (4) change narratives and adopt best communication practices; (5) study social drivers of health and lived experiences; (6) leverage health technologies; and (7) build, sustain, and lead culturally humble teams. We propose that equity should be a major goal of translational research, equally important as safety and efficacy. ANN NEUROL 2024;95:432-441.

NINDS Health Equity Strategic Planning Process Overview, High-Level Recommendations, and Guide.

Neurologic mortality is increasing in the United States and is occurring in an inequitable manner. There is a major need for innovative research strategies to eliminate these inequities. In 2020, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) embarked on a health equity strategic planning process, which culminated in a 3-day public workshop and research recommendations provided by a working group of its National Advisory Neurological Disorders and Stroke Council (NANDSC WG) to the NINDS. This Neurology® supplement is dedicated to the NINDS health equity strategic planning process. As cochairs of the NANDS WG, we developed this summary to provide an overview of the process and a guide for navigating this special issue. Detailed recommendations from the NANDS WG are distributed throughout various articles in this supplement and supported with extensive commentary on the state of the science in health equity. Consolidated high-level recommendations from this process are presented at the end of this article.

The Lives Lost to Inequities: Avertable Deaths From Neurologic Diseases in the Past Decade.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mortality rates for neurologic diseases are increasing in the United States, with large disparities across geographical areas and populations. Racial and ethnic populations, notably the non-Hispanic (NH) Black population, experience higher mortality rates for many causes of death, but the magnitude of the disparities for neurologic diseases is unclear. The objectives of this study were to calculate mortality rates for neurologic diseases by race and ethnicity and-to place this disparity in perspective-to estimate how many US deaths would have been averted in the past decade if the NH Black population experienced the same mortality rates as other groups. METHODS: Mortality rates for deaths attributed to neurologic diseases, as defined by the International Classification of Diseases, were calculated for 2010 to 2019 using death and population data obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the US Census Bureau. Avertable deaths were calculated by indirect standardization: For each calendar year of the decade, age-specific death rates of NH White persons in 10 age groups were multiplied by the NH Black population in each age group. A secondary analysis used Hispanic and NH Asian populations as the reference groups. RESULTS: In 2013, overall age-adjusted mortality rates for neurologic diseases began increasing, with the NH Black population experiencing higher rates than NH White, NH American Indian and Alaska Native, Hispanic, and NH Asian populations (in decreasing order). Other populations with higher mortality rates for neurologic diseases included older adults, the male population, and adults older than 25 years without a high school diploma. The gap in mortality rates for neurologic diseases between the NH Black and NH White populations widened from 4.2 individuals per 100,000 in 2011 to 7.0 per 100,000 in 2019. Over 2010 to 2019, had the NH Black population experienced the neurologic mortality rates of NH White, Hispanic, or NH Asian populations, 29,986, 88,407, or 117,519 deaths, respectively, would have been averted. DISCUSSION: Death rates for neurologic diseases are increasing. Disproportionately higher neurologic mortality rates in the NH Black population are responsible for a large number of excess deaths, making research and policy efforts to address the systemic causes increasingly urgent.

Black Patients with Ischemic Stroke and Hyperglycemia have Worse outcome than Whites if given Intensive Glucose Control.

BACKGROUND: Hyperglycemia is common after acute ischemic stroke and is associated with worse outcome, but intensive glucose control has not improved outcome. There is also a racial disparity in outcome after stroke, with Black patients more likely to have functional impairment than whites. We aimed to evaluate if there were racial differences in outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with intensive glucose control. METHODS: We performed a post-hoc analysis of the Stroke Hyperglycemia Insulin Network Effort (SHINE) trial to determine if Black patients had worse functional outcome than whites and if standard versus intensive glucose control modified that association. We included non-Hispanic white and Black patients. The primary outcome was excellent functional outcome (90-day modified Rankin Score of 0-1). To account for patient clustering by study site, we fit mixed-effects logistic regression models to our outcome and tested the interaction of treatment and race. RESULTS: We included 895 patients, of which 304 (34%) were Black and 591 (66%) were white. The rate of excellent outcome was 31.6% in Black patients versus 41.0% in white patients (p=0.006). After adjusting for potential confounders, the odds ratio for excellent outcome in Black patients was 0.54 (95% CI 0.38-0.77). The interaction term between treatment and race was significant (p=0.067). In the intensive treatment arm, Black patients had a predicted probability of excellent outcome of 26.4% (20.1-32.8) versus 42.7% (37.6-47.9) for white patients (p<0.001), while in the standard treatment arm the difference was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Black patients with acute ischemic stroke and hyperglycemia had worse functional outcome at 90 days than white patients, particularly if given intensive glucose control. These findings are from a post-hoc analysis and may be confounded, thus warrant additional study.

Teleradiology Assessment of Computerized Tomographs Online Reliability Study (TRACTORS) for acute stroke evaluation.

Telemedicine has potential to increase the use of tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) for ischemic stroke and is increasingly offered to provide stroke expertise to remote and underserved areas. The accuracy of stroke neurologists' use of telemedicine to read head computed tomography scans (CT) has not been demonstrated. We sought to determine the validity and reliability of neurologists' reading of acute stroke head CTs via teleradiology. The pilot study compared stroke neurologists' reading of CTs via teleradiology to gold standard readings of hard copies on a view box. Head CTs obtained during consecutive acute evaluations for thrombolytic therapy between February and July 2001 were used. For this study, each stroke neurologist was masked to all prior readings, clinical decisions regarding thrombolysis eligibility, and the reading of the other study neurologist. Each neurologist read one-half of the CT scans using teleradiology and the other one-half using a view box. We used the official reading by a neuroradiologist for comparison. The kappa statistic measured reliability. Validity was measured by sensitivity and specificity. Sixty scans were used for the analysis. The neurologists identified the same four hemorrhages using teleradiology that they and the neuroradiologist identified using the light board. Compared to the readings on a view box, the kappa statistic for eligibility for thrombolysis via teleradiology was 1.0. Sensitivity was 100%, 95% CI = (0.93, 1.0); specificity was 100%, 95% CI = (0.40, 0.98) in both comparisons. This pilot study provides encouraging preliminary evidence that neurologists with stroke expertise can determine radiological intravenous t-PA eligibility via teleradiology. Further analysis in a larger sample is necessary to validate these results.