Physical health monitoring in dementia and associations with ethnicity: a descriptive study using electronic health records.

BACKGROUND: Good physical health monitoring can increase quality of life for people with dementia, but the monitoring may vary and ethnic inequalities may exist. AIM: To investigate UK primary care routine physical health monitoring for people with dementia by: (a) ethnic groups, and (b) comorbidity status. DESIGN & SETTING: A retrospective cohort study was undertaken using electronic primary care records in the UK. METHOD: Physical health monitoring was compared in people with dementia from white, black, and Asian ethnic groups and compared those with ≥1 comorbidity versus no comorbidity, from 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2016. Using the Dementia : Good Care Planning framework and expert consensus, good care was defined as receiving, within 1 year: a dementia review; a blood pressure (BP) check (at least one); a GP consultation (at least one); a weight and/or body mass index (BMI) recording (at least one); and an influenza vaccination. RESULTS: Of 20 821 people with dementia, 68% received a dementia review, 80% at least one BP recording, 97% at least one GP contact, 48% a weight and/or BMI recording, and 81% an influenza vaccination in 1 year. Compared with white people, black people were 23% less likely and Asian people 16% less likely to have weight recorded (adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.60 to 0.98/0.84, 0.71 to 1.00). People without comorbidities were less likely to have weight recorded (adjusted IRR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.69 to 0.79) and BP monitored (adjusted IRR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.68 to 0.75). CONCLUSION: Ethnic group was not associated with differences in physical health monitoring, other than weight monitoring. Comorbidity status was associated with weight and BP monitoring. Physical health monitoring in dementia, in particular nutrition, requires improvement.

Antipsychotic polypharmacy prescribing patterns and costs in the Florida adult and child Medicaid populations.

The rapid growth in the use of antipsychotic medications and their related costs have resulted in states developing programs to measure, monitor, and insure their beneficial relevance to public program populations. One such program developed in the state of Florida has adopted an evidence-based approach to identify prescribers with unusual psychotherapeutic prescription patterns and track their utilization and costs among Florida Medicaid patients. This study reports on the prescriber prescription and cost patterns for adults and children using three measures of unusual antipsychotic prescribing patterns: (1) two antipsychotics for 60 days (2AP60), (2) three antipsychotics for 60 days (3AP60), and (2) two antipsychotics for 90 or more days (2AP90). We find that over the four-year study period there were substantial increases in several aspects of the Florida Medicaid behavioral drug program. Overall, for adults and children, patient participation increased by 29 percent, the number of prescriptions grew by 30 percent, and the number of prescribers that wrote at least one prescription grew 48.5 percent, while Medicaid costs for behavioral drugs increased by 32 percent. But the results are highly skewed. We find that a relatively small number of prescribers account for a disproportionately large share of prescriptions and costs of the unusual antipsychotic prescriptions. In general, the top 350 Medicaid prescribers accounted for more than 70 percent of the unusual antipsychotic prescriptions, and we find that this disparity in unusual prescribing patterns appears to be substantially more pronounced in adults than in children prescribers. For just the top 13 adult and children prescribers, their practice patterns accounted for 11 percent to 21 percent of the unusual prescribing activity and, overall, these 13 top prescribers accounted for 13 percent of the total spent on antipsychotics by the Florida Medicaid program and 9.3 percent of the total expenditure by the state for all drugs. Our findings suggest that a strategy to monitor and ensure patient safety and prescribing patterns that targets a relatively small number of Medicaid providers could have a substantial benefit and prove to be cost effective.

Improving psychotherapeutic medication prescribing in Florida: implementation of the Florida Medicaid Drug Therapy Management Program (MDTMP).

This paper describes a program that was established by Florida Medicaid to improve the quality of prescribing of psychotherapeutic medications. It relates the process used for defining quality medication treatment including the definitions of unusual psychotherapeutic medication indicators (UPMI). It details the results of analysis of FY 2007-2008 pharmacy claims data using these indicators that enabled the Program to identify practices and prescribers that required targeted interventions. The most frequently triggered UPMI for adults involved the use of 2 or more antipsychotics for greater than 60 days; high doses of psychotherapeutic medications was the indicator most frequently triggered for children closely followed by the use of 2 or more antipsychotics for more than 45 days. Prescriptions that triggered UPMI were concentrated in a small number of prescribers. These results led to the Program focusing on these high frequency practices and on the prescribers most associated with them. They also led to the implementation of new quality improvement initiatives like the implementation of a psychiatric telephone consultation line for pediatricians who are treating children with serious emotional disturbances who do not have access to child psychiatrists.

Impact of the Florida Medicaid prior-authorization program on use of antipsychotics by children under age six.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the impact of a prior-authorization process on the use of antipsychotic medications by children under six years old in Florida's fee-for-service Medicaid program. METHODS: Child psychiatrists reviewed requests for antipsychotic treatment (N=1,424) using forms and criteria created by a panel of Florida-based experts. Data on the characteristics of the children and clinicians involved were organized into 11 consecutive quarters beginning in July 2008. Multivariate generalized estimating equations were used to examine the association between each study variable and changes in the odds of submission of a new request over time. RESULTS: Prior-authorization requests declined from 124 in the first quarter to 81 in the last quarter. Compared with applications from child psychiatrists, the odds of applications being submitted by adult psychiatrists, neurologists, and pediatricians increased over time. CONCLUSIONS: Although applications declined, the diminished role of child psychiatry specialists raises questions about the impact of the program on the quality of care provided.