Prolonged Opioid Use Following Bladder Tumor Resection for Opioid-naïve Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Bladder cancer patients represent a high-risk group for opioid dependence due to the frequency of surgical procedures. Using MarketScan insurance commercial claims and Medicare-eligible databases, we sought to identify whether filling an opioid prescription following initial transurethral resection of bladder tumor resulted in increased odds of prolonged opioid use. METHODS: We analyzed 43,741 commercial claims and 45,828 Medicare-eligible opioid-naïve patients with a new diagnosis of bladder cancer from 2009 to 2019. Multivariable analyses were completed to assess the odds of prolonged opioid use at 3-6 months based on initial exposure to opioids and initial opioid dose quartile. We performed subgroup analyses by sex and eventual treatment modality. RESULTS: Those who filled an opioid prescription following initial transurethral resection of bladder tumor had greater odds of persistent opioid use (commercial claims: 27% vs 12%, OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.84-2.45; Medicare-eligible: 24% vs 12%, OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.70-2.22). Increasing dosage quartile of opioids was associated with increased odds of prolonged opioid use. Those going on to radical therapy had the highest rates of an initial opioid prescription (31% commercial claims and 23% Medicare eligible). Men and women had similar rates of initial prescriptions, but female sex was associated with higher odds of persistent opioid use at 3-6 months in the Medicare-eligible group (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.16). CONCLUSIONS: Opioids following initial transurethral resection of bladder tumor increase the odds of continued use at 3-6 months, with the greatest odds in those prescribed the highest initial doses. These data suggest that short-term prescriptions have long-term effects, and additional research on opioid use and bladder cancer outcomes is merited.

Longitudinal impact of bladder cancer diagnosis on common psychiatric disorders.

BACKGROUND: The presence of psychiatric disorders in patients with cancer is associated with increased morbidity and poorer outcomes. We sought to determine the impact of a new bladder cancer diagnosis on the incidence of depression and anxiety. METHODS: We used a database of billing claims (MarketScan®) to identify patients newly diagnosed with bladder cancer between 2009 and 2018. Patients with preexisting psychiatric disorders or use of anxiolytics/antidepressants were excluded. We matched cases to patients without a bladder cancer or psychiatric diagnosis. Our primary outcome was a new diagnosis of depression, anxiety, or use of anxiolytics/antidepressants. Other exposures of interest included gender and treatment received. We used multivariable regression to estimate odds ratios for these exposures. RESULTS: We identified 65,846 cases with a new diagnosis of bladder cancer (31,367 privately insured; 34,479 Medicare-eligible). Compared to controls, bladder cancer patients were more likely to develop new-onset depression/anxiety at 6 months (privately insured: 6.9% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.001; Medicare-eligible: 5.7% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.001) and 36 months (privately insured: 19.2% vs. 13.5%, p < 0.001; Medicare-eligible: 19.3% vs. 16.0%, p < 0.001). Women (vs. men, privately insured: OR 1.65, 95%CI 1.53-1.78; Medicare-eligible: OR 1.63, 95%CI 1.50-1.76) and those receiving cystectomy and chemotherapy (vs. no treatment, privately insured: OR 4.94, 95%CI 4.13-5.90; Medicare-eligible: OR 2.35, 95%CI 1.88-2.94) were more likely to develop significant depression/anxiety. CONCLUSION: A new diagnosis of bladder cancer was associated with increased burden of significant depression/anxiety compared with matched controls. Women and patients receiving more radical treatments had higher rates of depression and anxiety.