Association of early vertebroplasty with risk of hip replacement: A nationwide population-based cohort study in Taiwan.

Studies show that vertebral fractures could predict the risk of hip fractures. We aimed to evaluate the potential benefits of whether the timing of vertebroplasty (VP) for vertebral fracture associated with the risk of hip fracture for hip replacement.We identified 142,782 patients from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database with thoracolumbar vertebral fracture (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification:805.2-805.9) who were followed up from 2000 to 2013. These patients were divided into those who underwent VP (VP group) (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification : 78.49) within 3 months and those who did not (non-VP group). After adjusting for the confounding factors, the Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to estimate the effect of early VP on reducing the risk of hip fracture. The difference in the risk of hip replacement, between the VP group and non-VP group was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test.In the 14-year follow-up, the cumulative incidence rate of hip replacement in the VP group was lower than that in the non-VP group (0.362% and 0.533%, respectively, long-rank P < .001). There was a significant difference between the 2 groups since the first-year follow-up.Our study showed that early VP performed to avoid progression of the kyphotic changes following thoracolumbar vertebral fracture may reduce the risk of hip fracture. These results, obtained from retrospective data, indicate that a prospective study is warranted.

Comparison of A-line autoregressive index and observer assessment of alertness/sedation scale for monitored anesthesia care with target-controlled infusion of propofol in patients undergoing percutaneous vertebroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) with monitored anesthesia care (MAC) is a growing trend. Without adequate sedation, patient movement can affect and even interrupt the procedure during MAC. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the auditory-evoked potential (AEP) index and the Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scale as indicators of depth of sedation in patients undergoing PV. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty patients in ASA II to III, aged 43 to 92 years, undergoing elective PV with MAC, were randomly allocated to the AEP or the OAA/S group (n = 110 each). Initially, all patients received 1 µg/kg of fentanyl and 0.02 mg/kg of midazolam intravenously and sedation with a target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol at a target concentration of 1.2 µg/mL. The concentration for the propofol TCI was adjusted in 0.2 µg/mL increments or decrements according to the A-Line autoregressive index (AAI) or the OAA/S scale. A blinded study nurse recorded the measured parameters. RESULTS: Some parameters were significantly different in the AEP group compared with the OAA/S group: lower AAI, lower OAA/S score, lower respiratory rates, and higher end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure were noted from local anesthetic infiltration to bone cement implantation, fewer patients whose movements affected the procedure (10 vs. 36, respectively, P < 0.001), and more adjustments of TCI (twice vs. once, respectively, P < 0.006). The surgeons' satisfaction was greater for the AEP group than for the OAA/S group. CONCLUSIONS: TCI propofol with AEP monitoring can provide less patient movement, better sedation, and higher surgeon satisfaction in patients during prone-position PV procedures than can TCI propofol with OAA/S monitoring.