Health-Related Quality of Life Assessment in Sarcoidosis.

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is of major concern to patients with sarcoidosis. HRQoL impairment is the most common reason to treat the disease. Advances in patient-reported outcome (PRO) methodology offer the promise to use these instruments to follow quality of life in individual patients with sarcoidosis over time. Several HRQoL issues will be highlighted including their clinical importance, common causes in patients with sarcoidosis, the construction and use of PROs in clinical sarcoidosis trials, methods to adapt PROs to monitor HRQoL in individual patients with sarcoidosis, and the approach to improving HRQoL in this disease.

The association of baseline sarcoidosis measurements with 6-month outcomes that are of interest to patients: Results from the On-line Sarcoidosis Assessment Platform Study (OSAP).

INTRODUCTION: The impact of common measures to assess sarcoidosis have not been compared longitudinally to outcomes that are meaningful to patients. We prospectively examined the relationship of baseline measurements of sarcoidosis status to outcomes of interest to patients longitudinally over 6 months. METHODS: Sarcoidosis patients cared for at 6 US medical centers were "phenotyped" at baseline with measurements of pulmonary function, organ involvement, health related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments, and their anti-sarcoidosis treatment history. These patients were followed for 6 months by monitoring outcomes of interest to patients (OIPs) including steps walked, calories expended, sleep, HRQoL measures, workdays missed and health care utilization. For each baseline phenotypic measurement, patients were dichotomized into two groups above and below a specified cutoff value. The area under the OIP versus time curve was compared between these two groups. RESULTS: The cutoff values for many baseline phenotypic measures distinguished the patients into groups with significantly different 6-month OIPs. The chosen cutoff for the patient global estimate of health status distinguished the most OIPs (13/15). The 6-min walk distance cutoff was associated with more OIPs than spirometric measures. All of the HRQOL measure cutoffs were associated with many OIPs, although most of them were other HRQOL measures. INTERPRETATION: Cutoffs for most of the phenotypic measures used to assess sarcoidosis distinguished groups of sarcoidosis patients with differing OIPs over the subsequent 6 months. The patients' global assessment of their disease was the most accurate of these measures. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04342403.

Assessment of dyspnea in sarcoidosis using the Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI) and the Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI).

INTRODUCTION: The Borg and Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scales have been used to evaluate dyspnea in sarcoidosis. The Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI) and Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) are useful for the assessment of dyspnea in COPD. It is not known if the BDI-TDI accurately assesses dyspnea in sarcoidosis patients. METHODS: Data was analyzed from the Registry for Advanced Sarcoidosis (ReAS), a multi-national database enrolling patients with advanced sarcoidosis and a comparison group of sarcoidosis patients with non-advanced disease. At baseline, patients completed a BDI questionnaire along with spirometry, 6-min walk distance (6MWD), mMRC, Borg score, fatigue assessment score (FAS) and HRQoL assessments using Kings Sarcoidosis Questionnaire (KSQ) and St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). At 12-months, patients with advanced disease completed a TDI questionnaire along with the other measures. Correlations between BDI and baseline variables, and between TDI and changes in baseline variables were evaluated. RESULTS: There was significant correlation (p < 0.001 for all) between BDI and baseline 6MWD (rho = 0.336), FVC% (rho = 0.387), FEV1% (rho = 0.285), DLCO% (rho = 0.355), mMRC (rho = -0.721), Borg score (rho = -0.389), FAS (rho = -0.669), SGRQ (rho = -0.785), and KSQ (rho = 0.318 to 0.724). At follow-up, TDI correlated with BDI, but not with changes in pulmonary function or other dyspnea measures. CONCLUSION: BDI scores correlated with pulmonary function, 6MWD, and other dyspnea measures. TDI scores did not correlate with changes in pulmonary function or other dyspnea measures. BDI may be a useful independent measure of dyspnea in sarcoidosis patients. The role of TDI needs further evaluation in longitudinal studies associated with changes in clinical parameters.

Income and Other Contributors to Poor Outcomes in U.S. Patients with Sarcoidosis.

Rationale: Socioeconomic factors are associated with worse disease severity at presentation in sarcoidosis, but the relative importance of socioeconomic variables on morbidity and disease burden has not been fully elucidated.Objectives: To determine the association between income and sarcoidosis outcomes after controlling for socioeconomic and disease-related factors.Methods: Using the Sarcoidosis Advanced Registry for Cures database, we analyzed data from 2,318 patients with sarcoidosis in the United States to determine the effect of income and other variables on outcomes. We divided comorbidities arising after diagnosis into those likely related to steroid use and those likely related to sarcoidosis. We assessed the development of health-related, functional, and socioeconomic outcomes following the diagnosis of sarcoidosis.Measurements and Main Results: In multivariate analysis, low-income patients had significantly higher rates of new sarcoidosis-related comorbidities (<$35,000, odds ratio [OR], 2.4 [1.7-3.3]; $35,000-84,999, OR, 1.4 [1.1-1.9]; and ≥$85,000 [reference (Ref)]) and new steroid-related comorbidities (<$35,000, OR, 1.3 [0.9-2.0]; $35,000-84,999, OR, 1.5 [1.1-2.1]; and ≥$85,000 [Ref]), had lower health-related quality of life as assessed by the Sarcoidosis Health Questionnaire (P < 0.001), and experienced more impact on family finances (<$35,000, OR, 7.9 [4.9-12.7]; $35,000-84,999, OR, 2.7 [1.9-3.9]; and ≥$85,000 [Ref]). The use of supplemental oxygen, need for assistive devices, and job loss were more common in lower income patients. Development of comorbidities after diagnosis of sarcoidosis occurred in 63% of patients and were strong independent predictors of poor outcomes. In random forest modeling, income was consistently a leading predictor of outcome.Conclusions: These results suggest the burden from sarcoidosis preferentially impacts the economically disadvantaged.

Patient perspectives in sarcoidosis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The review presents an overview of the scientific publications about patient perspectives in sarcoidosis. RECENT FINDINGS: The literature on patient perspectives in sarcoidosis is limited. Patient perspectives in sarcoidosis encompass a myriad of topics that have been addressed to some degree in the literature: patient needs and perceptions, patient-reported burden of sarcoidosis, and patient treatment priorities. Similar findings across studies were high levels of reported fatigue, a need to incorporate psychological support into the treatment plan and easy access to sarcoidosis expert centers. Furthermore, largely similar results were found across countries. SUMMARY: There is a growing focus in patient perspectives in terms of sarcoidosis treatment. A multidisciplinary approach including psychological support and attention to fatigue, may better reflect the needs of sarcoidosis patients. Further research on sarcoidosis patient perspectives in sarcoidosis is needed to optimize care.

Assessment of Mediastinal Lymph Node Size in Pneumococcal Pneumonia with Bacteremia.

INTRODUCTION: The significance of mediastinal lymphadenopathy in bacterial pneumonia is unclear. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of mediastinal lymph node size determined by chest CT in patients with bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia. All patients who had positive blood cultures for streptococcus pneumonia over an 11-year period and had a chest CT scan (index CT) within 2 weeks of the positive blood culture were included in the study. Two thoracic radiologists and one pulmonologist independently examined the index CT plus any chest CT scans performed prior (pre-CT) or after (post-CT) the bacteremic episode. RESULTS: The study cohort of 49 patients was 57% male, 65% White, with mean age of 53 (SD = 20) years. Mediastinal lymphadenopathy was detected in 25/49 (51%) of the cases. The mean size of the largest mediastinal lymph node in short axis was 0.99 (SD = 0.71), ranging from 0.0 to 2.05 cm. There was no correlation noted between the number of lobes involved with pneumonia, and the size of the largest mediastinal lymph node (p = 0.33) or the number of pathologically enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes (p = 0.08). There was a statistically significant increase in the mean size of the largest lymph node between the pre-CT and index-CT group (p = 0.02), and decrease between the index-CT group and the post-CT (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Pneumococcal pneumonia with bacteremia is associated with mild mediastinal lymph node enlargement. The presence of marked mediastinal lymphadenopathy (short axis LN size > 2 cm) should not be assumed from pneumococcal pneumonia.

Disease Burden and Variability in Sarcoidosis.

Sarcoidosis is a systemic inflammatory disease with substantial morbidity and increasing mortality. As part of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's workshop to better understand this disease and improve the outcomes of patients with sarcoidosis, we reviewed the available data on health care burden and outcomes of this disease in the United States. Disparities in outcomes exist by race, ethnicity, sex, and socioeconomic groups, with African Americans having disproportionately more severe disease. Mortality rates are highest in African Americans, but may be increasing in white individuals. The health care burden of sarcoidosis is defined not only by its somatic manifestations, but is also greatly impacted by psychosocial, economic, and comorbid conditions associated with this disease. Fatigue, depression, cognitive dysfunction, treatment side effects, and pain syndromes are highly prevalent in this population and contribute to poor outcomes. The direct and indirect economic costs to patients and society are likely also substantial, although not well defined. We recommend leveraging existing and future technology and infrastructure to more accurately define and monitor the overall total sarcoidosis-attributable health care burden and patient outcomes in the United States.

The Assessment of Cough in a Sarcoidosis Clinic Using a Validated instrument and a Visual Analog Scale.

PURPOSE: Cough is a common symptom of pulmonary sarcoidosis. We analyzed the severity of cough and factors associated with cough in a university sarcoidosis clinic cohort. METHODS: Consecutive patients completed the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) and a cough visual analog scale (VAS). Clinical and demographic data were collected. Means of the LCQ were analyzed in patients who had multiple visits in terms of constant variables (e.g., race, sex). RESULTS: 355 patients completed the LCQ and VAS at 874 visits. Cough was significantly worse in blacks than whites as determined by the LCQ-mean (16.5 ± 2.6 vs. 17.8 ± 3.0, p < 0.001) and VAS-mean (3.8 ± 3.0 vs. 2.0 ± 2.6, p < 0.0001). Cough was worse in women than men as measured by the VAS-mean (2.7 ± 2.9 vs. 2.2 ± 2.7, p = 0.002), one of the LCQ-mean domains (LCQ-Social-mean 5.4 ± 0.9 vs. 5.2 ± 1.0, p = 0.03), but not the total LCQ-mean score. Cough was not significantly different by either measure in terms of smoking status, age, or spirometric parameter (FVC % predicted, FEV1 % predicted, FEV1/FVC). In a multivariable linear regression analysis, cough was significantly worse in blacks than whites and in pulmonary sarcoidosis than non-pulmonary sarcoidosis with both cough measures, in women than men for the VAS only, and not for spirometric parameters, Scadding stage, or age. The LCQ and VAS were strongly correlated. CONCLUSIONS: In a large university outpatient sarcoidosis cohort, cough was worse in blacks than whites. Cough was not statistically significantly different in terms of age, spirometric measures, Scadding stage, or smoking status. The LCQ correlated strongly with a visual analog scale for cough.

Inter-rater reliability of cutaneous sarcoidosis assessment tools via remote photographic assessment.

Background: Recently two outcome instruments have been developed and validated for assessing cutaneous sarcoidosis in a live, in-person setting. Teledermatology is a rapidly growing field; yet, to date, no instrument has been validated for use in a remote setting, which could ultimately impact clinical trial design. Objective: To assess the interrater reliability of these outcome instruments for store-and-forward teledermatology. Methods: Seven sarcoidosis experts, including both pulmonologists and dermatologists, scored photographs of cutaneous sarcoidosis lesions in 13 patients utilizing the Cutaneous Sarcoidosis Activity and Morphology Index (CSAMI), the Sarcoidosis Activity and Severity Index (SASI) and the Physician Global Assessment (PGA). Interrater reliability was assessed for each instrument and was compared to results obtained from a prior study involving sarcoidosis experts evaluating the same patient population in an in-person setting. Results: Interrater reliability (presented as ICC [95%CI]) was poor for the CSAMI Activity scale (0.36 [0.16 - 0.65]) and the CSAMI Damage scale (0.17 [0.04 - 0.43]) and was fair for the Modified Facial SASI (0.59 [0.36 - 0.82]) and the PGA (0.47 [0.23 - 0.74]). All results were inferior to those obtained from the prior studies validating these instruments for in-person use. Conclusions: Given the superiority of these instruments when utilized in person, it is recommended to have an on-site sarcoidosis expert evaluate cutaneous sarcoidosis lesions whenever possible. (Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis 2017; 34: 165-169).

Sarcoidosis in America. Analysis Based on Health Care Use.

RATIONALE: There have been no recent comprehensive studies of the epidemiology of sarcoidosis in the United States. Changes in health care use have made available access to data on large numbers of patients with sarcoidosis. OBJECTIVES: To use a U.S. national health care database to gather data on patients with sarcoidosis identified over a 3-year period who were 18 years of age and older, and to determine health care costs for these patients. METHODS: The Optum health care database was queried for a 3-year period (2010-2013). This database includes approximately 15% of U.S. residents. The incidence rate of sarcoidosis was calculated for new cases identified in each year. Calculation of prevalence was based on any patient with sarcoidosis seen during the year. Incidence and prevalence rates are reported per 100,000 patients. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 29,372 adult patients with sarcoidosis were identified. Of these, 14,700 (55%) were over 55 years of age at the time of diagnosis. The incidence and prevalence rates were higher for African Americans (17.8 and 141.4 per 100,000, respectively) than for white individuals (8.1 and 49.8), Hispanics (4.3 and 21.7), or Asians (3.2 and 18.9). Women were two times more likely to have sarcoidosis, with the highest prevalence for sarcoidosis noted in African American women (178.5). Overall, the yearly health care cost reported for patients with sarcoidosis was low, with a median of $18,663 per year. However, the yearly cost for the top 5% was $93,201. CONCLUSIONS: For patients 18 years of age and older enrolled in a U.S. national administrative database, sarcoidosis was more common among African Americans, but it was reported for all four of the major ethnic groups studied. While health care costs were relatively small for most patients, the cost of care for some patients was considerable.

Quality of Life Assessment in Sarcoidosis.

Quantifying health-related quality of life (HRQL) and specific patient symptoms has developed to include rigorous techniques to develop patient-reported outcome measures (PROs). PROs may assess objectively the impact of a therapeutic intervention in a clinical sarcoidosis trial, and may be useful in following HRQL. Item response theory may lead to the construction of PROs that allow for the development of short forms, the PRO to be focused on specific areas along the continuum of the trait being studied, and the development of computer-adaptive testing where HRQL can be assessed accurately using very few items.

The effect of corticosteroids on quality of life in a sarcoidosis clinic: the results of a propensity analysis.

BACKGROUND: Both sarcoidosis and its treatment may worsen health related quality of life (HRQoL). We performed a propensity analysis of sarcoidosis-specific HRQoL patient reported outcome measures (PRO) to disentangle the effects of sarcoidosis and corticosteroid therapy on HRQoL in sarcoidosis outpatients. METHODS: Consecutive outpatient sarcoidosis patients were administered modules from two sarcoidosis-specific HRQoL PROs: the Sarcoidosis Health Questionnaire (SHQ) and the Sarcoidosis Assessment Tool (SAT). Patients were divided into those that received ≤500 mg of prednisone (PRED-LOW) versus >500 mg of prednisone (PRED-HIGH) over the previous year. SAT and SHQ scores were initially compared in the two corticosteroid groups. Then a multivariate analysis was performed using a propensity score analysis adjusted for race, age, gender and the severity of illness. RESULTS: In the unadjusted analysis, the PRED-HIGH group demonstrated the following worse HRQoL scores compared to the LOW-PRED group: SHQ Daily (p = 0.02), SAT satisfaction (p = 0.03), SAT daily activities (p = 0.03). In the propensity analysis, the following domains demonstrated worse HRQoL in the PRED-HIGH group than the PRED-LOW group: SAT fatigue (p < 0.0001), SAT daily activities (p = 0.03), SAT satisfaction (p = 0.03). All these differences exceeded the established minimum important difference for these SAT domains. The SHQ Physical score appeared to demonstrate a borderline improved HRQoL in the PRED-HIGH versus the PRED-LOW group (p = 0.05).). In a post-hoc exploratory analysis, the presence of cardiac sarcoidosis may have explained the quality of life differences between the two corticosteroid groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our cohort of sarcoidosis clinic patients who received ≤500 mg of prednisone in the previous year had an improved HRQoL compared to patients receiving >500 mg on the basis of two sarcoidosis-specific PROs after adjusting for severity of illness. These data support the need to measure HRQoL in sarcoidosis trials, and suggest that the search should continue for effective alternative medications to corticosteroids.

Validation and important differences for the Sarcoidosis Assessment Tool. A new patient-reported outcome measure.

RATIONALE: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures have been developed to measure symptoms and other aspects of health-related quality of life. OBJECTIVES: The Sarcoidosis Assessment Tool (SAT), a sarcoidosis-specific PRO, was administered in a lung and skin sarcoidosis treatment trial. We explored SAT performance characteristics and correlation with standard clinical measurements to validate it as a useful clinical sarcoidosis-specific PRO. METHODS: The SAT analyses focused on baseline and Week 16 assessments. Besides the SAT, participants underwent clinical and physician assessments plus additional PROs that were used as anchor variables and were compared with the SAT. Reliability was evaluated by using Cronbach α coefficient. Spearman correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the association between SAT scores with clinical and other PRO measures. Changes between assessments in the clinical and PRO "anchor" variables were classified as improved, stable, or worsened. Mean differences between adjacent categories of the known groups and mean changes from the ability to detect change analyses were reviewed for appropriate clinically important difference estimates. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Results from 173 patients were analyzed. Each SAT module reflected appropriate anchor variables at baseline and in terms of change. The Cronbach α for each of these modules was at least 0.87. In addition, we successfully established a clinically important difference range for each SAT module. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that the SAT is a reliable and consistent sarcoidosis-specific PRO. It has excellent internal consistency and reliability. A range of clinically important differences has been established for the SAT modules. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 00955279).

The WASOG Sarcoidosis Organ Assessment Instrument: An update of a previous clinical tool.

INTRODUCTION: A Case Control Etiology of Sarcoidosis Study (ACCESS) sarcoidosis organ assessment instrument has been used for more than a decade to establish uniform standards for the probability of sarcoidosis organ involvement. The ACCESS instrument has become increasingly outdated as new technologies have been developed. Furthermore, the ACCESS instrument failed to address all possible organs involved with sarcoidosis. For these reasons, the World Association of Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Diseases (WASOG) developed a new sarcoidosis organ assessment instrument. METHODS: Clinical sarcoidosis experts assessed various clinical manifestations for the probability of sarcoidosis organ involvement. Two criteria were required to apply this assessment: 1) histologic evidence of granulomatous inflammation of unknown cause in an organ that was not being assessed; 2) the clinical manifestation being addressed required that alternative causes other than sarcoidosis had been reasonably excluded. Clinical manifestations were assessed as either: a) highly probable: likelihood of sarcoidosis causing this manifestation of at least 90%.; b) probable: likelihood of sarcoidosis causing this manifestation of between 50 and 90%; c) possible: likelihood of sarcoidosis causing this manifestation of less than 50%. The sarcoidosis experts voted on the likelihood of sarcoidosis causing each manifestation using Delphi study methodology where at least 70% agreement of the experts was needed for consensus. RESULTS: Various clinical manifestations were classified as highly probable, at least probable, possible, or indeterminate when no consensus could be reached. CONCLUSION: An instrument was developed by expert opinion that may be useful for the clinician and researcher in establishing criteria for sarcoidosis organ involvement.

Patient-reported outcome measures for sleep disorders and related problems: clinical and research applications.

Patients with sleep disorders are most concerned with the impact of these diseases on their quality of life. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurement tools, which assess aspects of a patient's health status that come directly from the patient, are well suited to evaluate quality of life related to sleep disorders. Although PRO data are subjective, they can be quantified, evaluated for reliability and reproducibility, and used to answer questions of clinical and research importance. This article reviews various PRO measure tools used for sleep disorders in clinical and research settings. These instruments may play a role in screening, diagnosis, and monitoring of various sleep disorders.

A proposed solution to the clinical assessment of sarcoidosis: the sarcoidosis three-dimensional assessment instrument (STAI).

The clinical assessment of sarcoidosis has been confounded by its inexact diagnostic criteria, multiorgan involvement, and effects of therapy. In this manuscript an instrument, the Sarcoidosis Three-Dimensional Assessment Instrument (STAI), is proposed to assess the clinical state of sarcoidosis. The instrument examines each organ involved with sarcoidosis separately. For each organ, the instrument contains three axes: involvement, severity, and activity. Involvement is based upon a previously described instrument that has been updated to capture involvement of more organs and to account for advances in diagnostic testing for sarcoidosis. Severity is based both on the decline from normal capacity as well as physical and psychosocial limitation. Disease activity takes into account changes in organ function as well as changes in therapy. Although this instrument is presently not validated, it is hoped that it will undergo study as it rationally accounts for several problems of previous assessment instruments.

Racial and ethnic disparities in sarcoidosis: from genetics to socioeconomics.

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous disease of unknown cause that occurs worldwide. The clinical expression of sarcoidosis varies by race. These racial differences may be the result of genetic and socioeconomic factors. Many of these genetic associations are race-specific in that they are found in either African Americans or whites but not both. Socioeconomic differences may also explain the racial disparities between African American and white patients with sarcoidosis. Finally, the phenotypic differences be-tween races may relate to an interaction between genetics and socioeconomic factors. The influences of genetics and socioeconomic status on the development and phenotypic expression of sarcoidosis will be better understood as the mechanisms of disease development are uncovered.