Prevalence and Determinants of Masked Hypertension Among Black Nigerians Compared With a Reference Population.

Hitherto, diagnosis of hypertension in sub-Saharan Africa was largely based on conventional office blood pressure (BP). Data on the prevalence of masked hypertension (MH) in this region is scarce. Among individuals with normal office BP (<140/90 mm Hg), we compared the prevalence and determinants of MH diagnosed with self-monitored home blood pressure (≥135/85 mm Hg) among 293 Nigerians with a reference population consisting of 3615 subjects enrolled in the International Database on Home Blood Pressure in Relation to Cardiovascular Outcomes. In the reference population, the prevalence of MH was 14.6% overall and 11.1% and 39.6% in untreated and treated participants, respectively. Among Nigerians, the prevalence standardized to the sex and age distribution of the reference population was similar with rates of 14.4%, 8.6%, and 34.6%, respectively. The mutually adjusted odds ratios of having MH in Nigerians were 2.34 (95% confidence interval, 1.39-3.94) for a 10-year higher age, 1.92 (1.11-3.31) and 1.70 (1.14-2.53) for 10- or 5-mm Hg increments in systolic or diastolic office BP, and 3.05 (1.08-8.55) for being on antihypertensive therapy. The corresponding estimates in the reference population were similar with odds ratios of 1.80 (1.62-2.01), 1.64 (1.45-1.87), 1.13 (1.05-1.22), and 2.84 (2.21-3.64), respectively. In conclusion, MH is as common in Nigerians as in other populations with older age and higher levels of office BP being major risk factors. A significant proportion of true hypertensive subjects therefore remains undetected based on office BP, which is particularly relevant in sub-Saharan Africa, where hypertension is now a major cause of death.

Social, lifestyle and demographic inequalities in hypertension care.

AIMS: Recent nationwide in-depth analyses on inequalities in hypertension prevalence and care are scarce. This study assessed sociodemographic and lifestyle factors associated with the prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in Finland. METHODS: A representative nationwide sample (participation rate 58%) of the Finnish adult population underwent a health examination and interview in 2011. After excluding participants with missing data, 4230 people were included in the analyses. Weighted regression modelling was used to explore the associations of sociodemographic and lifestyle factors with the prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension. RESULTS: The prevalence, awareness, treatment and control rates of hypertension (blood pressure ⩾140/90 mmHg or antihypertensive medication) in Finland were 47%, 57%, 51% and 48%, respectively. Older age, male sex, lower education, retirement, higher BMI, never-smoking and heavy alcohol use were associated with a higher prevalence of hypertension (p<0.05). In contrast, younger age, non-retirement, lower BMI, smoking and high physical activity were associated with lower awareness and treatment rates (p<0.05). In addition, male sex was associated with lower awareness rates (p<0.01). Hypertension control was better in younger participants (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In addition to high prevalence and moderate treatment rates of hypertension, serious sociodemographic and lifestyle inequities in hypertension care exist in Finland. Hypertension is more prevalent in older people of lower socio-economic status with adverse lifestyles. However, hypertension is more often unrecognised and untreated among people with low risk of hypertension.

Risk assessment of echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy with electrocardiography, body mass index and blood pressure.

AIMS: Electrocardiography (ECG) has a high specificity but unfortunately low sensitivity to detect anatomic left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). In this study, ECG amplitude and products were examined as continuous variables together with blood pressure (BP) and body mass index (BMI) to find out a simple method to predict echocardiographic (ECHO)-LVH. An age- and gender-stratified population-based sample of men (n = 121) and women (n = 135) aged 35-64 years enriched with newly diagnosed untreated hypertensive men (n = 138) and women (n = 97) in the Turku area in south-western Finland was studied. MAJOR FINDINGS: Cornell voltage (or Cornell product), systolic BP (SBP) and BMI were all independent determinants of ECHO-LVH and left ventricular mass (LVM) indexed by height (LVMI). According to multivariate regression analyses with Cornell voltage (Cornell product), BMI and BP as explanatory variables, the three determinants explained 46-48% (47-49%) of the variation in LVMI among men and 50-54% (52-57%) among women. Score tables were constructed to estimate the probability of LVH. The estimated probability of ECHO-LVH increased in men gradually from 0% to 81% (79%) along with increased Cornell voltage (Cornell product) tertiles and in women respectively from 0% to 95% (97%). CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of ECG to detect ECHO-LVH can be markedly enhanced by using ECG amplitudes and products as continuous variables. The risk tables using Cornell voltages or products, BMI and SBP enable an easy and effective way to estimate the probability of ECHO-LVH.

Oscillometric and auscultatory blood pressure measurement in the assessment of blood pressure and target organ damage.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to elucidate the usefulness of both the oscillometric blood pressure (OBP) and auscultatory blood pressure (ABP) measurement technique in the assessment of blood pressure (BP) and target organ damage in the general population. METHODS: We studied a sample of the Finnish adult population aged 25-74 years. Four hundred and eighty-four study participants underwent a health examination including measurements of 24-h urine albumin, echocardiographic variables of the left ventricle, intima media thickness and pulse wave velocity. OBP and ABP were measured simultaneously four times by beginning the OBP measurements in random order from the right or left arm and by switching the devices between hands after two measurements. RESULTS: The mean OBP was 126.7/77.4 mmHg and the mean ABP was 124.5/78.0 mmHg. Systolic difference between OBP compared with ABP was large in men. Male sex, higher arm circumference and lower systolic BP were independent determinants explaining the greater difference between systolic OBP compared with ABP. Diabetes, higher arm circumference and higher pulse wave velocity were independent determinants explaining greater difference between diastolic OBP compared with ABP. The correlations of target organ damage between OBP and ABP were equally good. CONCLUSION: At population level OBP and ABP measurements yielded similar results in relation to BP level and the indicators of target organ damage, probably due to the simultaneous and controlled measurement protocol, and to the sample of participants from the general population. It is, however, recommendable to use either OBP or ABP measurements for individual patients to avoid unnecessary interdevice variability.