Histopathological risk assessment in multisite epithelial dysplasia: A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Histopathological grading of oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) is the current standard for stratifying cancer progression risk but is associated with subjectivity and variability. This problem is not commonly seen regarding the grading of epithelial dysplasia in other sites. This systematic review aims to compare grading systems for oral, anal, penile, and cervical epithelial dysplasia to determine their predictive accuracy for recurrence and malignant transformation (MT) outcomes. METHODS: The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023403035) and was reported according to the PRISMA checklist. A comprehensive search was performed in the main databases and gray literature. The risk of bias in individual studies was analyzed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for each study design. RESULTS: Forty-six studies were deemed eligible and included in this systematic review, of which 45 were included in the quantitative analysis. Meta-analysis revealed that the binary system demonstrated a higher predictive ability for MT/recurrence of OED compared to multilevel systems. Higher predictive accuracy of MT was also observed for binary grading systems in anal intraepithelial neoplasia. CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference was found between the current grading systems of epithelial dysplasia in different body parts. However, binary grading systems have shown better clinical outcomes.

ATMP-classified, scalable, autologous cell spray for the treatment of skin wounds and assessment of its effects on wound healing clinically and on a molecular level.

BACKGROUND: Autologous split-thickness skin grafts (STSGs) are the standard of care for closure of deep and large burns. However, perforation and extensive fishnet-like expansion of the grafts to achieve greater area wound coverage can lead to treatment failures or esthetically poor healing outcomes and scarring. The purpose of this study was to validate an autologous advanced therapy medicinal product (ATMP)-compliant skin cell suspension and evaluate its efficacy to promote epithelialization. METHODS: Cells isolated from a piece of STSG according to ATMP classification requirements were sprayed onto 20 patients during a single operation in a validation study. Comparative evaluation of treatment efficacy was carried out using side-by-side skin graft donor site wounds that were standardized in depth. Firstly, we characterized wound healing transcriptomes at 14 and 21 days from serial wound biopsies in seven patients. Then, side-by-side wounds in four patients were treated with or without the skin cells. The wounds were photographed, clinical outcomes assessed, and the treatment and control wound transcriptomes at 14 days were compared to the untreated wounds' healing transcriptomes. RESULTS: The average cell yield after isolation from the STSG was 2.4 × 106 cells/cm2 with 96 % viability. The product contained mainly keratinocytes and their precursors but also other skin cells such as fibroblasts were present. As compared to vehicle-treated donor site wounds, the wounds treated with cells demonstrated improved epithelialization by both direct comparison and machine learning analysis of the transcriptomes. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that rapid and scalable ATMP-classified processing of skin cells is feasible, and application of the skin cells effectively promotes healing and epithelization of donor site wounds.

The Helsinki approach to face transplantation.

AIM: We herein describe the establishment of the Helsinki Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation (VCA) program and its execution in the first two face transplant cases. METHODS & PATIENTS: The Helsinki VCA program initially required the fulfillment of legal, hospital, financial, and ethical requirements. Thereafter, the assembling of a multidisciplinary team commenced. A team of Plastic, maxillofacial and ENT surgeons comprise the facial VCA team. The protocol involves collaboration with the Solid Organ Transplant (SOT) team, transplant immunology, immunosuppression, microbiology, psychiatric evaluation, well-defined VCA indications and informed consent. Between 2011 and 2017 two patients were selected for transplantation. Both patients had a severe composite facial deformity involving the maxilla and mandible following earlier ballistic injury. RESULTS: Patient 1 was a 35 year-old male who underwent successful near total face transplantation in February 2016 and at 30 months he has a good aesthetic outcome with symmetrical restoration of the central face and good sensory and symmetrical motor functional outcomes. Patient 2 was a 58 year-old male who underwent full face transplantation in March 2018 and at 5 months he has recovered without major problems. CONCLUSION: A successful facial VCA program requires a well-prepared research protocol, experts from multiple specialties and careful patient selection. The establishment of the Helsinki VCA program required long and thorough planning and resulted in the first two Nordic face transplantation cases. This protocol now forms the platform (as a proof of concept) for other types of vascularized composite allotransplantations.