Public assistance in patients with acute heart failure: a report from the KCHF registry.

AIMS: There is a scarcity of data on the post-discharge prognosis in acute heart failure (AHF) patients with a low-income but receiving public assistance. The study sought to evaluate the differences in the clinical characteristics and outcomes between AHF patients receiving public assistance and those not receiving public assistance. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Kyoto Congestive Heart Failure registry was a physician-initiated, prospective, observational, multicentre cohort study enrolling 4056 consecutive patients who were hospitalized due to AHF for the first time between October 2014 and March 2016. The present study population consisted of 3728 patients who were discharged alive from the index AHF hospitalization. We divided the patients into two groups, those receiving public assistance and those not receiving public assistance. After assessing the proportional hazard assumption of public assistance as a variable, we constructed multivariable Cox proportional hazard models to estimate the risk of the public assistance group relative to the no public assistance group. There were 218 patients (5.8%) receiving public assistance and 3510 (94%) not receiving public assistance. Patients in the public assistance group were younger, more frequently had chronic coronary artery disease, previous heart failure hospitalizations, current smoking, poor medical adherence, living alone, no occupation, and a lower left ventricular ejection fraction than those in the no public assistance group. During a median follow-up of 470 days, the cumulative 1 year incidences of all-cause death and heart failure hospitalizations after discharge did not differ between the public assistance group and no public assistance group (13.3% vs. 17.4%, P = 0.10, and 28.3% vs. 23.8%, P = 0.25, respectively). After adjusting for the confounders, the risk of the public assistance group relative to the no public assistance group remained insignificant for all-cause death [hazard ratio (HR), 0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.69-1.32; P = 0.84]. Even after taking into account the competing risk of all-cause death, the adjusted risk within 180 days in the public assistance group relative to the no public assistance group remained insignificant for heart failure hospitalizations (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.64-1.34; P = 0.69), while the adjusted risk beyond 180 days was significant (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.07-2.29; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The AHF patients receiving public assistance as compared with those not receiving public assistance had no significant excess risk for all-cause death at 1 year after discharge or a heart failure hospitalization within 180 days after discharge, while they did have a significant excess risk for heart failure hospitalizations beyond 180 days after discharge. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02334891 (NCT02334891) and https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000017241 (UMIN000015238).

Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Elderly Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction　- An Analysis From a Japanese Nationwide Claim-Based Database.

BACKGROUND: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is strongly recommended by guidelines for patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but its applications in elderly patients are less clear.Methods and Results:The JROAD-DPC is a Japanese nationwide registry for patients with cardiovascular diseases combined with an administrative claim-based database. Among 2,369,165 records from 2012 to 2015, data for 115,407 AMI patients were extracted for this study. Elderly patients (≥75 years) comprised 45,645 subjects (39.6%), and received pPCI less frequently (62.2%) than younger patients (79.2%, P<0.001). Clinical variables such as higher age, female sex, higher Killip class, and renal dysfunction, but not functional status on admission, were predictors of non-application of pPCI. Endpoint 30-day mortality increased with aging, and was significantly higher in elderly patients (10.7%) than in younger patients (3.8%, P<0.001). Indeed, pPCI was independently associated with lower 30-day mortality only in subgroups of patients aged ≥60 years. Propensity score-matching analysis confirmed a similar reduction in endpoint 30-day mortality with pPCI in elderly patients. Duration of hospitalization was significantly shorter and functional ability on discharge was significantly better in elderly patients who underwent pPCI. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with AMI underwent pPCI less frequently, but it was consistently associated with better clinical outcome in these patients. Our findings support the proactive application of pPCI for elderly AMI patients when they are eligible for an invasive strategy.

Treatment strategy modification and its implication on the medical cost of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) could improve outcome compared with angiography-guided PCI. However, the economic impact of FFR-guided PCI remains largely unknown in the medical system in Japan. We evaluated the impact of treatment strategy modification by FFR measurement on the direct medical cost using a model analysis with a decision tree model in Japan. METHODS: For the clinical parameters set in the model, the findings from CVIT-DEFER registry were adopted. Cost parameters were considered on the assumption that coronary angiography, FFR measurement, and the treatment are performed at Diagnosis Procedure combination (DPC) hospitals, and the costs were calculated based on the medical fee reimbursement systems in Japan. RESULTS: The probability of deferral of PCI in patients who were allocated to PCI based on coronary angiography was set as 90.1% based on the CVIT-DEFER registry. In the model analysis, the cost of tests was increased by 185,660 JPY per patient by the addition of FFR measurement, but the cost of treatment with PCI was reduced by 561,425 JPY per patient, and the entire cost of treatment was reduced by 322,675 JPY, resulting in the expected reduction in the total expected medical cost by 137,015 JPY per patient. CONCLUSION: Under contemporary Japanese practice, FFR-guided PCI has potential to reduce the medical cost by effective reassessment of coronary stenosis and reducing inappropriate application of PCI.

Impact of Institutional and Operator Volume on Short-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report From the Japanese Nationwide Registry.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the volume-outcome relationship for PCI within the nationwide registration system in Japan. BACKGROUND: The effect of site and operator case load for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on outcomes has not been investigated thoroughly in non-Western regions. METHODS: In the present study, PCI procedural data recorded between January 2014 and December 2015 in the Japanese PCI registry, a nationwide registration system, were analyzed. Institutions and operators were categorized into deciles based on the number of PCIs performed per year. Odds ratios (ORs) for in-hospital mortality and the composite endpoint (in-hospital death and periprocedural complications) were estimated for each decile (with the lowest volume group as a reference group). RESULTS: A total of 323,322 PCIs (at 625 hospitals [median PCI cases/year: 216; quartiles: 121 to 332] by 4,211 operators [median PCI cases/year: 28; quartiles: 10 to 56]) were analyzed, of which 2,959 patients (0.9%) and 7,205 patients (2.2%) experienced in-hospital mortality and the composite endpoint after PCI, respectively. The adjusted risk for in-hospital mortality and the composite endpoint was significantly higher in hospitals included in the lowest decile (<150 PCIs/year); the risk remained consistently low across the remaining deciles. Contrastingly, no significant volume-outcome relationship was observed between operator volume and outcomes. A similar trend was observed when the analysis was confined to emergency/urgent PCI cases. CONCLUSIONS: In contemporary Japanese PCI practice, lower institutional volume was related inversely to in-hospital outcomes, but the association of annual operator volume with outcomes was less clear.