Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
EClinicalMedicine ; 69: 102443, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38380071

RESUMO

Background: To date, economic analyses of tissue-based next generation sequencing genomic profiling (NGS) for advanced solid tumors have typically required models with assumptions, with little real-world evidence on overall survival (OS), clinical trial enrollment or end-of-life quality of care. Methods: Cost consequence analysis of NGS testing (555 or 161-gene panels) for advanced solid tumors through the OCTANE clinical trial (NCT02906943). This is a longitudinal, propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study in Ontario, Canada using linked administrative data. Patients enrolled in OCTANE at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre from August 2016 until March 2019 were matched with contemporary patients without large gene panel testing from across Ontario not enrolled in OCTANE. Patients were matched according to 19 patient, disease and treatment variables. Full 2-year follow-up data was available. Sensitivity analyses considered alternative matched cohorts. Main Outcomes were mean per capita costs (2019 Canadian dollars) from a public payer's perspective, OS, clinical trial enrollment and end-of-life quality metrics. Findings: There were 782 OCTANE patients with 782 matched controls. Variables were balanced after matching (standardized difference <0.10). There were higher mean health-care costs with OCTANE ($79,702 vs. $59,550), mainly due to outpatient and specialist visits. Publicly funded drug costs were less with OCTANE ($20,015 vs. $24,465). OCTANE enrollment was not associated with improved OS (restricted mean survival time [standard error]: 1.50 (±0.03) vs. 1.44 (±0.03) years, log-rank p = 0.153), varying by tumor type. In five tumor types with ≥35 OCTANE patients, OS was similar in three (breast, colon, uterus, all p > 0.40), and greater in two (ovary, biliary, both p < 0.05). OCTANE was associated with greater clinical trial enrollment (25.4% vs. 9.5%, p < 0.001) and better end-of-life quality due to less death in hospital (10.2% vs. 16.4%, p = 0.003). Results were robust in sensitivity analysis. Interpretation: We found an increase in healthcare costs associated with multi-gene panel testing for advanced cancer treatment. The impact on OS was not significant, but varied across tumor types. OCTANE was associated with greater trial enrollment, lower publicly funded drug costs and fewer in-hospital deaths suggesting important considerations in determining the value of NGS panel testing for advanced cancers. Funding: T.P H holds a research grant provided by the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research through funding provided by the Government of Ontario (#IA-035 and P.HSR.158) and through funding of the Canadian Network for Learning Healthcare Systems and Cost-Effective 'Omics Innovation (CLEO) via Genome Canada (G05CHS).

2.
J Palliat Med ; 26(10): 1365-1373, 2023 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37437122

RESUMO

Background: Integrating palliative care in the management of patients with lung cancer improves quality of life, patient satisfaction, and overall survival. However, few patients receive timely palliative care consultation. The Lung Diagnostic Assessment Program (LDAP) in Southeastern Ontario is a multidisciplinary rapid assessment clinic that expedites the diagnosis and management of patients with suspected lung cancer. Objectives: We sought to increase the percentage of LDAP patients with stage IV lung cancer receiving palliative care consultation within three months of diagnosis. Design: We integrated a palliative care specialist in LDAP to facilitate in-person, same-visit consultation for patients with a new lung cancer diagnosis. Setting/Subjects: Five hundred fifty patients in a Canadian academic center (154 initial baseline, 104 COVID baseline, 292 post-palliative care integration). Measurements: Baseline data were established using retrospective chart review (February-June 2020 and December 2020-March 2021 due to COVID-19 pandemic). Data were collected prospectively to assess improvement (March-August 2021). Statistical Process Control charts assessed for special cause variation; chi-square tests assessed for differences between groups. Results: The percentage of patients with stage IV lung cancer seen by palliative care within three months increased from 21.8% (12/55) during early-COVID baseline to 49.2% (32/65) after palliative care integration (p < 0.006). Palliative care integration in LDAP reduced mean time from referral to consultation from 24.8 to 12.3 days, including same-day consultation for 15/32 (46.8%) patients with stage IV disease. Conclusions: Integrating palliative care specialists into LDAP improved the timeliness of palliative care assessment for patients with stage IV lung cancer.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pandemias , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Ontário
3.
J Pediatr Surg ; 46(11): 2140-5, 2011 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22075346

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify the impact of ethnicity and language on parental attitudes regarding analgesic use to treat children's pain. METHODS: A total of 206 parents of children undergoing outpatient surgery were recruited to complete the Medication Attitudes Questionnaire, a measure of parental beliefs about using analgesic medications to treat children's pain. Parents were grouped into one of 3 categories according to ethnicity and primary language spoken: English-speaking white, English-speaking Hispanic, and Spanish-speaking Hispanic. Group differences in pain medication attitudes were examined. RESULTS: After controlling for socioeconomic status, English-speaking Hispanic parents endorsed higher levels of misconceptions about pain medication use, including a tendency to avoid analgesic use for children, compared with English-speaking white and Spanish-speaking Hispanic parents. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights parental characteristics, including ethnicity and language, which may place children at higher risk for undertreatment of acute pain based on misconceptions about analgesic use for children. Specifically, English-speaking Hispanic parents may be most likely to undertreat children's pain at home. Future studies are needed to identify the most appropriate means of providing education to counter parental misconceptions and support optimal pain management of children's pain in the home setting.


Assuntos
Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Etnicidade/psicologia , Idioma , Manejo da Dor/psicologia , Pais/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Analgésicos/efeitos adversos , California , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Cultura , Escolaridade , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino/psicologia , Humanos , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Relações Pais-Filho , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/prevenção & controle , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , População Branca/psicologia
4.
Paediatr Anaesth ; 21(10): 1046-51, 2011 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21554490

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To examine the role of ethnicity, language, and socioeconomic variables in parental desire for information regarding children's surgery. AIM: To compare anesthetic and surgical information desired between English- and Spanish-speaking White and Hispanic mothers of children undergoing outpatient surgery. BACKGROUND: Parents report wanting to receive detailed information regarding children's preoperative care; however, variables such as parent ethnicity and language spoken have not been accounted for in understanding desire for information. METHODS/MATERIALS: One hundred and eighty-one mothers of children undergoing outpatient surgery, elective surgery, and general anesthesia were recruited and categorized into one of three groups: English-speaking White (ESW, n=79), English-speaking Hispanic (ESH, n = 63), and Spanish-speaking Hispanic (SSH, n = 39). In addition to providing demographic questionnaire, mothers completed the Parental Desire for Information (PDI) questionnaire, a 14-item measure of surgery and anesthesia-related statements. RESULTS: Overall, mothers desired receiving information about the majority of the items on the PDI. As compared to ESW mothers, SSH mothers and ESH mothers were overrepresented in the 'have a right to know' response option, with significant differences existing in items concerning alternative methods of anesthesia, details of needles used, and location of PACU and OR. CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesiologists should tailor the provision of preoperative information based on ethnicity and language of mothers involved. Ethnic and language differences shown in this study may exist in other populations as well.


Assuntos
Comunicação , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Pais , Período Perioperatório/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Análise de Variância , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Escolaridade , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Renda , Idioma , Masculino , Análise de Regressão , Tamanho da Amostra , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e Questionários , População Branca
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA