Clinical validation and assessment of feasibility of volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) for monitoring of nilotinib, cabozantinib, dabrafenib, trametinib, and ruxolitinib.

Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to conventional sampling. However, the applicability of VAMS must be investigated clinically. Therefore, the feasibility of at-home sampling was investigated for the kinase inhibitors nilotinib, cabozantinib, dabrafenib, trametinib and ruxolitinib and evaluated regarding the acceptance of at-home microsampling, sample quality of at-home VAMS and incurred sample stability. In addition, clinical validation including three different approaches for serum level predictions was performed. For this purpose, VAMS and reference serum samples were collected simultaneously. Conversion of VAMS to serum concentration was based either on a linear regression model, a hematocrit-dependent formula, or using a correction factor. During the study period 591 VAMS were collected from a total of 59 patients. The percentage of patients who agreed to perform VAMS at home ranged from 50.0 % to 84.6 % depending on the compound. 93.1 % of at-home VAMS were collected correctly. Regarding the drug stability in dried capillary blood, no stability issues were detected between on-site and at-home VAMS. Linear regression showed a strong correlation between VAMS and reference serum concentrations for nilotinib, cabozantinib, dabrafenib and ruxolitinib (r 0.9427 - 0.9674) and a moderate correlation for trametinib (r 0.5811). For clinical validation, the acceptance criteria were met for all three approaches for three of the five kinase inhibitors. Predictive performance was not improved by using individual hematocrit instead of population hematocrit and was largely independent of conversion model. In conclusion, VAMS at-home has been shown to be feasible for use in routine clinical care and serum values could be predicted based on the measured VAMS concentration for nilotinib, cabozantinib, and dabrafenib.

Reduced Segmentation of Lesions Is Comparable to Whole-Body Segmentation for Response Assessment by PSMA PET/CT: Initial Experience with the Keyhole Approach.

(1) Background: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)-derived parameters, such as the commonly used standardized uptake value (SUV) and PSMA-positive tumor volume (PSMA-TV), have been proposed for response assessment in metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) patients. However, the calculation of whole-body PSMA-TV remains a time-consuming procedure. We hypothesized that it may be possible to quantify changes in PSMA-TV by considering only a limited number of representative lesions. (2) Methods: Sixty-five patients classified into different disease stages were assessed by PSMA PET/CT for staging and restaging after therapy. Whole-body PSMA-TV and whole-body SUVmax were calculated. We then repeated this calculation only including the five or ten hottest or largest lesions. The corresponding serum levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were also determined. The derived delta between baseline and follow-up values provided the following parameters: ΔSUVmaxall, ΔSUVmax10, ΔSUVmax5, ΔPSMA-TVall, ΔPSMA-TV10, ΔPSMA-TV5, ΔPSA. Finally, we compared the findings from our whole-body segmentation with the results from our keyhole approach (focusing on a limited number of lesions) and correlated all values with the biochemical response (ΔPSA). (3) Results: Among patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive PCa (mHSPC), none showed a relevant deviation for ΔSUVmax10/ΔSUVmax5 or ΔPSMA-TV10/ΔPSMA-TV5 compared to ΔSUVmaxall and ΔPSMA-TVall. For patients treated with taxanes, up to 6/21 (28.6%) showed clinically relevant deviations between ΔSUVmaxall and ΔSUVmax10 or ΔSUVmax5, but only up to 2/21 (9.5%) patients showed clinically relevant deviations between ΔPSMA-TVall and ΔPSMA-TV10 or ΔPSMA-TV5. For patients treated with radioligand therapy (RLT), up to 5/28 (17.9%) showed clinically relevant deviations between ΔSUVmaxall and ΔSUVmax10 or ΔSUVmax5, but only 1/28 (3.6%) patients showed clinically relevant deviations between ΔPSMA-TVall and ΔPSMA-TV10 or ΔPSMA-TV5. The highest correlations with ΔPSA were found for ΔPSMA-TVall (r ≥ 0.59, p ≤ 0.01), followed by ΔPSMA-TV10 (r ≥ 0.57, p ≤ 0.01) and ΔPSMA-TV5 (r ≥ 0.53, p ≤ 0.02) in all cohorts. ΔPSA only correlated with ΔSUVmaxall (r = 0.60, p = 0.02) and with ΔSUVmax10 (r = 0.53, p = 0.03) in the mHSPC cohort, as well as with ΔSUVmaxall (r = 0.51, p = 0.01) in the RLT cohort. (4) Conclusion: Response assessment using PSMA-TV with a reduced number of lesions is feasible, and may allow for a simplified evaluation process for PSMA PET/CT.

Comparison of different algorithms for the assessment of cardiovascular risk after kidney transplantation by the time of entering waiting list.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of cardiovascular disease is high among patients with chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular events (CVE) remain the leading cause of death after kidney transplantation (KT). We performed a retrospective analysis of 389 KT recipients to assess if the European Society of Cardiology Score (ESC-Score), Framingham Heart Study Score (FRAMINGHAM), Prospective Cardiovascular Munster Study Score (PROCAM-Score) or Assessing cardiovascular risk using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network Score (ASSIGN-Score) algorithms can predict cardiovascular risk after KT at the time of entering the waiting list. METHODS: 389 KT candidates were scored by the time of entering the waiting list. Pearsons chi-square test, cox regression analysis and survival estimates were performed to evaluate the reliability of the cardiovascular scoring models after successful KT. RESULTS: During a follow-up of 8 ± 5.8 years, 96 patients (30%) died due to cardiovascular problems, whereas 13.9% suffered non-fatal CVE. Graft loss occurred in 84 patients (21.6%). Predictors of CVE, survival and graft loss were age and the length of end-stage kidney disease. All scores performed well in assessing the risk for CVE (P < 0.01). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis using the ESC-SCORE, as an example, suggested a cut-off for risk stratification and clinical decisions. CONCLUSIONS: We found all tested scores were reliable for cardiovascular assessment. We suggest using cardiac scores for risk assessment before KT and then taking further steps according to current guidelines.