[Online Rehab-Need Test (OREST): Effectiveness of an Invitation to Proactive Screening (self-test) for the Need for Medical Rehabilitation Among Individuals Covered by the German Statutory Pension Insurance Agencies in Baden-Württemberg and the Rhine Region]. / Online-Rehabedarfstest (OREST): Wirksamkeit einer Einladung zu einem proaktiven Screening (Selbsttest) auf Bedarf an medizinischen Rehabilitationsmaßnahmen bei Versicherten der Deutschen Rentenversicherung Baden-Württemberg und Rheinland.

PURPOSE: Up to now, there has been a lack of proactive approaches on the part of the rehabilitation providers, while simultaneously a suspected unmet rehabilitation need exists in some groups of insured persons. Therefore, the effectiveness of the invitation to a web-based self-test for rehabilitation needs as a new access route to medical rehabilitation was evaluated. The main question was whether the intervention leads to more approved rehabilitation applications in the follow-up period of 22 months and whether this effect is also apparent after controlling other influencing variables. METHODS: A randomized, controlled study with N=8000 insured persons of two regional statutory pension insurance agencies was conducted to check the effectiveness of the intervention. Insured persons of the intervention group (IG; n=4000) were informed by mail about the web-based self-test and received individual access data for it (user ID and PIN). The control group (CG; n=4000) received no information about the self-test. The primary outcome was the rate of approved rehabilitation applications, the secondary outcome was the application rate regardless of approval. RESULTS: Groups do not differ significantly in terms of primary or secondary outcomes. Even after controlling for other influencing factors, the intervention does not contribute to the prediction of outcomes, but some control variables, such as previous rehabilitation experience, prove to be important predictors for the application. CONCLUSION: The mere offer of a self-test for rehabilitation need by the pension insurance institution has no effect on the application process. Hence a letter from the pension insurance institution as the sole means of access does not appear suitable for increasing the rate of meaningful rehabilitation applications.

Intervention policies and social security in case of reduced working capacity in the Netherlands, Finland and Germany: a comparative analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Working age disability is a major challenge for policymakers in European countries. This pertains to both occupational reintegration and social benefits for work incapacity. In many states reforms have been initiated aimed at reducing disability scheme inflow and fostering return to work. Our study was motivated by the question as to which aspects of these reforms seem to have been effective. METHODS: Three different approaches were utilized: case vignettes, interviews and expert workshops in the respective countries (Netherlands and Germany in 2012; Finland in 2015), and a systematic search for relevant studies on occupational reintegration was performed. RESULTS: We found considerable differences as to the assessment of work incapacity and resulting monetary benefits in the three countries. Also, organisation and practices of occupational reintegration vary from one country to another. Major differences concern (1) the timing of interventions, (2) employer responsibility and workplace involvement, (3) incentives and sanctions and (4) organisational and procedural issues. CONCLUSIONS: Our results may partly explain why some reform strategies have been more successful than others, and thus contribute to the further development of social and labour policies in Europe.