Assessment of hypertension in obstructive sleep apnea by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Among obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients, there exists a high prevalence of hypertension. Determining the optimal blood pressure (BP) monitoring modality in this population will lead to a better understanding of hypertension profiles and a more accurate diagnosis of hypertension. PubMed, Ovid/Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases were screened, and the relevant articles regarding BP monitoring in OSA patient population were selected. Studies evaluating both ambulatory (ABPM) and office BP measurements were selected to be analyzed for the hypertension diagnosis specificity of ABPM measurement in OSA patients compared with office measurements. If reported, additional information regarding white-coat, masked hypertension, and circadian BP pattern prevalence was included. A cumulative analysis of five studies revealed a prevalence of hypertension based on BP to be 44%, whereas a cumulative analysis of four studies revealed a prevalence of hypertension based on ABPM to be 66%. Excluding a study with the nighttime assessment of hypertension reduced the cumulative prevalence of hypertension in OSA patients to 59%. The cumulative prevalence of Studies demonstrated the prevalence of masked and white-coat hypertension to be 34 and 9%, respectively. As a higher prevalence of hypertension was detected by ABPM and nighttime measurement, it can be deduced that ABPM is more sensitive in determining OSA patients with hypertension, and that nighttime ABPM further increases this sensitivity. The presence of masked and white-coat hypertension in OSA patients underlines the importance of correct hypertension diagnosis as it affects further management in this population with increased cardiovascular risk.

Long-term cardio-vascular risk assessment in chronic kidney disease and kidney transplanted patients following SARS-COV-2 disease: protocol for multi-center observational match controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) produced a pandemic since March 2020 by affecting more than 243 million people with more than 5 million deaths globally. SARS-CoV-2 infection is produced by binding to angiotensin-converting enzyme, which among other sites is highly expressed in the endothelial cells of the blood vessels, pericytes and the heart, as well as in renal podocytes and proximal tubular epithelial cells. SARS-CoV-2 and cardiovascular disease (CVD) are interconnected by risk factors association with an increased incidence of the disease and by determining de novo cardiac complications. At the same time, COVID-19 disease can lead to acute kidney injury directly, or due to sepsis, multi-organ failure and shock. Therefore, the pre-existence of both CVD and chronic kidney disease (CKD) is linked with a higher risk of severe disease and worse prognosis. METHODS: The main aim of this study is to assess the CV risk in a CKD (stage 3 to 5), dialysis and kidney transplanted population, following SARS-CoV-2 infection, with focus on the endothelial dysfunction as compared to a control group of matched patients. By using clinical evaluation, flow-mediated dilatation, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, intima-media thickness, echocardiographic parameters, lung ultrasound, bioimpedance spectroscopy and a series of novel biomarkers, the investigators will determine the long-term impact of this disease on CV and renal outcomes. DISCUSSION: This study will address the challenges and implications in long-term CV sequeale of COVID-19 and focus on a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms and possible therapeutic options. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Patient enrolment in the trial started in January 2021 and is expected to finish at the end of 2022. The study can be found on ClinicalTrials.gov database with NCT05125913 identifier. Registered on 18 November 2021 - Retrospectively registered.

Intensive blood pressure control on dementia in patients with chronic kidney disease: Potential reduction in disease burden.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and dementia are both common comorbidities creating considerable morbidity and mortality, especially in the elderly population with potential interactions. Even though various hypothetical mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology of increased risk of dementia and cognitive impairment in CKD patients have been implicated, no consensus has been reached so far. Recent clinical trials have investigated the therapeutic role of intensive blood pressure control on the risk of dementia in CKD patients with potentially improved outcomes. However, such trials have significant limitations that may influence the outcome and lack specific management guidelines. We reviewed the role of blood pressure and other factors on the risk of dementia in CKD patients which is an issue with high potential for clinical implications that may improve morbidity, mortality, and health expenditures along with its' potential pathophysiological mechanisms and future guidance.

The assessment of hypertension in kidney transplant patients: time to change our approach?

Kidney transplantation (KT) is an increasingly utilized treatment for end-stage kidney disease. Hypertension either as a cause of kidney disease or as a complication of chronic kidney disease is the most frequently encountered comorbidity of KT patients. Hence, the management of hypertension in KT patients is crucial to prolong patient and graft survival. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) appeared as a promising technique that has superiority over office and home blood pressure (BP) monitoring to correctly diagnose and manage hypertension. A recent meta-analysis by Pisano et al. including 42 studies with 4115 participants provided strong data for the comparison of ABPM with office BP monitoring in KT patients. In addition to the current literature knowledge, the findings of Pisano et al. filled the long-awaited evidence gap to suggest ABPM as a first-line BP monitoring technique for KT patients. Despite its disadvantages, such as patient discomfort, cost-effectiveness and limited availability, ABPM has crucial advantages in the management of hypertension including the detection of abnormal circadian BP patterns, the assessment of effects of physical activity and short-term variability of BP, and the exclusion of masked and white-coat hypertension.

Role of collagen turnover biomarkers in the noninvasive assessment of myocardial fibrosis: an update.

The pro-fibrotic milieu, as the result of the extracellular matrix remodeling, is a central feature in the pathophysiology of heart disease and contributes to its high morbidity and mortality. Fibrosis is a recognized risk factor for development of heart failure and arrythmias and is usually detected by cardiac magnetic resonance or endomyocardial biopsy. Collagen type I and type III are major components of the collagen network, and the assessment of their derived biomarkers could serve as estimate of the myocardial fibrotic content. This review summarizes data from numerous studies in which these biomarkers have proven their diagnostic and prognostic utility, setting the stage for further randomized clinical trials that might translate into early implementation of antifibrotic therapies.

Effects of Volume Overload and Current Techniques for the Assessment of Fluid Status in Patients with Renal Disease.

Volume overload is an important, may be the foremost, independent prognostic factor determining the outcome of hemodialysis patients. Therefore, it is crucial to measure fluid status of these patients and avoid volume overload. This review aims to evaluate volume overload, its effects on patients with renal diseases and current methodologies measuring volume status in the body. These techniques will be first classified as clinical evaluation and non-clinical and/or instrumental techniques, which includes biomarkers, ultrasonography, relative blood volume monitoring, bioimpedance, echocardiography, pulmonary artery catheterization, esophageal and/or suprasternal Doppler, and blood viscosity. Advantages and limitations of these different techniques will be reviewed extensively by comparing each other. At last, insights gained from this review can highlight the future prospects in this active area of research.

Dry weight assessment by combined ultrasound and bioimpedance monitoring in low cardiovascular risk hemodialysis patients: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Fluid overload is associated with adverse outcomes in hemodialysis (HD) patients. The precise assessment of hydration status in HD patients remains a major challenge for nephrologists. Our study aimed to explore whether combining two bedside methods, lung ultrasonography (LUS) and bioimpedance, may provide complementary information to guide treatment in specific HD patients. METHODS: In total, 250 HD patients from two dialysis units were included in this randomized clinical trial. Patients were randomized 1:1 to have a dry weight assessment based on clinical (control) or LUS with bioimpedance in case of clinical hypovolemia (active)-guided protocol. The primary outcome was to assess the difference between the two groups on a composite of all-cause mortality and first cardiovascular event (CVE)-including death, stroke, and myocardial infarction. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up period was 21.3 ± 5.6 months, there were 54 (21.6%) composite events in the entire population. There was a nonsignificant 9% increase in the risk of this outcome in the active arm (HR = 1.09, 95% CI 0.64-1.86, p = 0.75). Similarly, there were no differences between the two groups when analyzing separately the all-cause mortality and CVE outcomes. However, patients in the active arm had a 19% lower relative risk of pre-dialytic dyspnea (rate ratio-0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.96), but a 26% higher relative risk of intradialytic cramps (rate ratio-1.26, 95% CI 1.16-1.37). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that a LUS-bioimpedance-guided dry weight adjustment protocol, as compared to clinical evaluation, does not reduce all-cause mortality and/or CVE in HD patients. A fluid management protocol based on bioimpedance with LUS on indication might be a better strategy.

The role of sodium intake in nephrolithiasis: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and future directions.

The prevalence of nephrolithiasis has doubled over the last decade and the incidence in females now approaches that of males. Since dietary salt is lithogenic, a purported mechanism common to both genders is excess dietary sodium intake vis-a-vis processed and fast foods. Nephrolithiasis has far-reaching societal implications such as impact on gross domestic product due to days lost from work (stone disease commonly affects working adults), population-wide carcinogenic diagnostic and interventional radiation exposure (kidney stone disease is typically imaged with computed tomographic imaging and treated under imaging guidance and follow-up), and rising healthcare costs (surgical treatment will be indicated for a number of these patients). Therefore, primary prevention of kidney stone disease via dietary intervention is a low-cost public health initiative with massive societal implications. This primer aims to establish baseline epidemiologic and pathophysiologic principles to guide clinicians in sodium-directed primary prevention of kidney stone disease.

Probrain natriuretic peptide for assessment of efficacy in heart failure treatment.

N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is elevated in patients with heart failure. Numerous clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy of spironolactone in heart failure; however, no studies have directly examined the effects of spironolactone treatment on NT-proBNP level. This study investigated whether NT-proBNP levels decrease with daily spironolactone treatment. The study consisted of 117 adult patients with heart failure. All participants were divided into 3 groups, class I, class II, and class III, according to the New York Heart Association classification system. Patients were randomly assigned to receive spironolactone or were treated with another drug, other than spironolactone, as placebo. NT-proBNP plasma samples were taken at baseline and after 6 mo of treatment. A total of 62 patients were treated with daily spironolactone; 55 patients were followed with available treatment without spironolactone. The baseline demographic and laboratory parameters were similar for patients in all groups. At the end of 6 mo, spironolactone-treated patients had significantly lower NT-proBNP levels and significantly better ejection fractions than did patients in all New York Heart Association classes who were not treated with spironolactone. Results suggest that spironolactone decreases plasma NT-proBNP concentrations, and that the measurement of plasma NT-proBNP levels may be helpful in assessing therapeutic efficacy in patients who are treated for heart failure.