Costs and Impact of Disease in Adults with Sickle Cell Disease: A Pilot Study.

Limited data are available to characterize sickle cell disease (SCD) related disease burden and outcomes. We assessed the feasibility of collecting data to estimate illness burden in adults with SCD; investigated factors associated with health-related quality of life (HRQoL); and estimated societal burden. We recruited 32 adults with SCD. We collected data on fatigue, HRQoL and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment via patient survey. Healthcare utilization was abstracted for the 12 months prior to enrollment using medical chart review. Mean (standard deviation) age was 36.7 (10.6) years, 84.4% had hemoglobin (Hb)SS/Sthal0 disease, and 81.3% reported chronic pain (experiencing pain on ≥3 days per week in the past 6 months). Mean EQ-5D-3L VAS was 63.4, index score was 0.79. The mean fatigue score was 57.9 (range 33.7-75.9). Higher fatigue score was correlated with lower EQ-5D index score (correlation coefficient r=-0.35, p=0.049), and ASCQ-Me scores, including pain (r=-0.47, p=0.006), sleep (r=-0.38, p=0.03), and emotion (r=-0.79, p<0.0001). The number of hospitalizations was negatively correlated with HRQoL (all p<0.05). Patients who reported chronic pain had significantly lower mean ASCQ-Me sleep scores (48.3 vs. 57.1, p=0.04) and EQ-5D index scores (0.72 vs. 0.89, p=0.002) than those without chronic pain. Mean estimated annual per-person costs were $51,779 (median: $36,366) for total costs, $7,619 ($0) for indirect costs (estimated from lost earnings of participants), and $44,160 ($31,873) for medical costs. Fatigue, SCD complications, hospitalization and chronic pain negatively impact HRQoL in this cohort. This sample experienced a high economic burden, largely from outpatient doctor visits.

Perspectives of individuals with sickle cell disease on barriers to care.

INTRODUCTION: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited hemoglobinopathy that predominantly affects African Americans in the United States. The disease is associated with complications leading to high healthcare utilization rates, including emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations. Optimal SCD care requires a multidisciplinary approach involving SCD specialists to ensure preventive care, minimize complications and prevent unnecessary ED visits and hospitalizations. However, most individuals with SCD receive sub-optimal care or are unaffiliated with care (have not seen an SCD specialist). We aimed to identify barriers to care from the perspective of individuals with SCD in a multi-state sample. METHODS: We performed a multiple methods study consisting of surveys and interviews in three comprehensive SCD centers from March to June 2018. Interviews were transcribed and coded, exploring themes around barriers to care. Survey questions on the specific themes identified in the interviews were analyzed using summary statistics. RESULTS: We administered surveys to 208 individuals and conducted 44 in-depth interviews. Barriers to care were identified and classified according to ecological level (i.e., individual, family/interpersonal, provider, and socio-environmental/organizational level). Individual-level barriers included lack of knowledge in self-management and disease severity. Family/interpersonal level barriers were inadequate caregiver support and competing life demands. Provider level barriers were limited provider knowledge, provider inexperience, poor provider-patient relationship, being treated differently, and the provider's lack of appreciation of the patient's SCD knowledge. Socio-environmental/organizational level barriers included limited transportation, lack of insurance, administrative barriers, poor care coordination, and reduced access to care due to limited clinic availability, services provided or clinic refusal to provide SCD care. CONCLUSION: Participants reported several multilevel barriers to SCD care. Strategies tailored towards reducing these barriers are warranted. Our findings may also inform interventions aiming to locate and link unaffiliated individuals to care.

For which diseases do broader value elements matter most? An evaluation across 20 ICER evidence reports.

BACKGROUND: U.S. value framework developers such as the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) use cost-effectiveness analysis to value new health care technologies. Often, these value assessment frameworks use a health system perspective without fully accounting for societal and broader benefits and costs of an intervention. Although there is ongoing debate about the most appropriate methods for including broader value elements in value assessment, it remains unclear whether the inclusion of these value elements is likely to affect the quantitative estimates of treatment value. OBJECTIVE: To assess variations in the relevance of broader value elements to cost-effectiveness analysis across diseases. METHODS: Thirty-two broader value elements (e.g., caregiver burden, health equity, real option value, productivity) not traditionally included in health technology assessments were identified through a targeted literature review. Evidence reports published by ICER between July 2017 and January 2020 were evaluated to identify which broader value elements were discussed as relevant to each disease in the report text. The study examined whether there were associations among ICER's discussion of broader value elements, rare disease status, treatment cost, estimated treatment cost-effectiveness, and ICER committee voting results for contextual considerations and additional benefits/disadvantages. RESULTS: The most commonly cited broader value element category in the ICER evidence reports was household and leisure (e.g., absenteeism from normal activities and caregiver burden). More value elements were cited for inherited retinal disease (19 elements) and sickle cell disease (18 elements) than for other diseases. Cardiovascular disease and diabetes had the fewest number of value elements cited (7 elements). Rare diseases were more likely to have broader value elements cited compared with nonrare diseases (15.9 vs. 11.5, P < 0.001). Treatments with higher (i.e., less favorable) incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were more likely to have a greater number of broader value elements cited (ρ = 0.625, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of broader value elements varied across diseases, with less cost-effective treatments more likely to have a higher number of relevant broader value elements. Inclusion of all relevant value elements in value assessments will more appropriately incentivize innovation and improve allocation of research funding. DISCLOSURES: This study was sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation. At the time of this study, Shafrin was employed by PRECISIONheor, a consultancy to the life sciences industry that received financial support from Novartis to conduct this study. Dennen, Pednekar, and Birch are employed by PRECISIONheor. Bhor was an employee of Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation at the time this research was conducted and manuscript was developed and reports grants from Novartis, unrelated to this work. Kanter has served on scientific advisory boards and steering committees for and reports receiving consulting fees from Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation and is a site principal investigator on studies funded by Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation. Kantar also reports support from Sickle Cell Disease Association of America Inc. and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, unrelated to this work. Neumann reports advisory boards or consulting fees from Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation and PRECISIONheor, as well as advisory boards or consulting fees unrelated to this study from AbbVie, Amgen, Avexis, Bayer, Congressional Budget Office, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Precision Health Economics, Veritech, Vertex; funding from The CEA Registry Sponsors by various pharmaceutical and medical device companies; and grants from Amgen, Lundbeck, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, National Pharmaceutical Council, Alzheimer's Association, and the National Institutes for Health.

Feasibility of an mHealth self-management intervention for children and adolescents with sickle cell disease and their families.

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited hemoglobinopathy that leads to blood vessel occlusion and multiorgan complications, including pain, that may be experienced daily. Symptom management often begins at home, and tools are needed to support self-management strategies that can be implemented by children with SCD and families. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of the mHealth self-management intervention (application) Voice Crisis Alert V2 for children with SCD and families. Feasibility assessment was guided by the Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework. Data were collected with 60 dyads (children with SCD/caregivers) at four time points. Self-management data were collected via application use, and postintervention interviews were conducted. Analyses included descriptive statistics and constant comparison with directed content analysis. Recruitment was completed in 28 weeks, with 82% retention at end-of-intervention. Mobile Application Rating Scale scores and interview data indicated high satisfaction. From baseline to mid-intervention, 94% of dyads used the application (75% of total use); 45% used the application from mid-intervention to the end-of-intervention. Dyads made 2,384 actions in the application; the most commonly used features were recording health history and recording and tracking symptoms. Few reported issues with the application; most issues occurred early in the study and were corrected. After the intervention period was completed, 37% continued to use the application. Feasibility was confirmed by meeting recruitment and retention goals, high adoption of the application, and high reported satisfaction with the application. Challenges with sustained use were encountered, and areas for improvement were identified.

A Survey-Based Needs Assessment of Barriers to Optimal Sickle Cell Disease Care in the Emergency Department.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Guided by an implementation science framework, this needs assessment identifies institutional-, provider-, and patient-level barriers to care of sickle cell disease (SCD) in the emergency department (ED) to inform future interventions conducted by the multicenter Sickle Cell Disease Implementation Consortium. METHODS: The consortium developed and implemented a validated needs assessment survey administered to a cross-sectional convenience sample of patients with SCD and ED providers caring for them. In total, 516 adolescents and adults with SCD and 243 ED providers from 7 and 5 regions of the United States, respectively, responded to the ED care delivery for SCD survey. RESULTS: Survey results demonstrated that 84.5% of respondents with SCD have an outpatient provider who treats many patients with SCD. In the ED, 54.3% reported not receiving care fast enough and 46.0% believed physicians did not care about them and believed similarly of nurses (34.9%). Consequently, 48.6% of respondents were "never" or "sometimes" satisfied with their ED care. Of surveyed ED providers, 75.1% were unaware of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute recommendations for vaso-occlusive crises, yet 98.1% were confident in their knowledge about caring for patients with SCD. ED providers identified the following factors as barriers to care administration: opioid epidemic (62.1%), patient behavior (60.9%), crowding (58.0%), concern about addiction (47.3%), and implicit bias (37.0%). CONCLUSION: The results underscore that many patients with SCD are dissatisfied with their ED care and highlight challenges to optimal care on the practice, provider, and patient levels. Exploring these differences may facilitate improvements in ED care.

Building access to care in adult sickle cell disease: defining models of care, essential components, and economic aspects.

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most common inherited blood disorder in the United States. It is a medically and socially complex, multisystem illness that affects individuals throughout the lifespan. Given improvements in care, most children with SCD survive into adulthood. However, access to adult sickle cell care is poor in many parts of the United States, resulting in increased acute care utilization, disjointed care delivery, and early mortality for patients. A dearth of nonmalignant hematology providers, the lack of a national SCD registry, and the absence of a centralized infrastructure to facilitate comparative quality assessment compounds these issues. As part of a workshop designed to train health care professionals in the skills necessary to establish clinical centers focused on the management of adults living with SCD, we defined an SCD center, elucidated required elements of a comprehensive adult SCD center, and discussed different models of care. There are also important economic impacts of these centers at an institutional and health system level. As more clinicians are trained in providing adult-focused SCD care, center designation will enhance the ability to undertake quality improvement and compare outcomes between SCD centers. Activities will include an assessment of the clinical effectiveness of expanded access to care, the implementation of SCD guidelines, and the efficacy of newly approved targeted medications. Details of this effort are provided.

Needs Assessment for Patients with Sickle Cell Disease in South Carolina, 2012.

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a needs assessment for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) in South Carolina using statewide administrative data to examine acute care utilization during a defined 12-month period. The data were collected to provide information for state and regional service providers, managed care companies, and policy makers to identify demographic gaps in care and inform policy and educational efforts to improve care. METHODS: We obtained records on emergency department visits and hospitalizations through patient-based uniform billing data. We stratified analyses of acute care utilization and 30-day readmission rates by patient age, region, and expected payer. RESULTS: Young adults, those with public insurance, and those who resided in a region with the largest number of patients had the highest rates of acute care utilization and 30-day readmissions. Patients who resided in a largely rural area without access to comprehensive care also had high rates of acute care utilization and readmissions. The pattern of readmissions data suggested that data on 7- or 14-day readmission rates, in addition to data on 30-day readmission rates, could be used as benchmarks of quality of care for adult patients with SCD. CONCLUSION: Administrative datasets can provide important information on demographic gaps in care for patients with SCD. The results highlight both national and regional issues in the provision of health-care services for patients with SCD.

Validation of a Low-Cost Paper-Based Screening Test for Sickle Cell Anemia.

BACKGROUND: The high childhood mortality and life-long complications associated with sickle cell anemia (SCA) in developing countries could be significantly reduced with effective prophylaxis and education if SCA is diagnosed early in life. However, conventional laboratory methods used for diagnosing SCA remain prohibitively expensive and impractical in this setting. This study describes the clinical validation of a low-cost paper-based test for SCA that can accurately identify sickle trait carriers (HbAS) and individuals with SCA (HbSS) among adults and children over 1 year of age. METHODS AND FINDINGS: In a population of healthy volunteers and SCA patients in the United States (n = 55) the test identified individuals whose blood contained any HbS (HbAS and HbSS) with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity for both visual evaluation and automated analysis, and detected SCA (HbSS) with 93% sensitivity and 94% specificity for visual evaluation and 100% sensitivity and 97% specificity for automated analysis. In a population of post-partum women (with a previously unknown SCA status) at a primary obstetric hospital in Cabinda, Angola (n = 226) the test identified sickle cell trait carriers with 94% sensitivity and 97% specificity using visual evaluation (none of the women had SCA). Notably, our test permits instrument- and electricity-free visual diagnostics, requires minimal training to be performed, can be completed within 30 minutes, and costs about $0.07 in test-specific consumable materials. CONCLUSIONS: Our results validate the paper-based SCA test as a useful low-cost tool for screening adults and children for sickle trait and disease and demonstrate its practicality in resource-limited clinical settings.

Density-based separation in multiphase systems provides a simple method to identify sickle cell disease.

Although effective low-cost interventions exist, child mortality attributable to sickle cell disease (SCD) remains high in low-resource areas due, in large part, to the lack of accessible diagnostic methods. The presence of dense (ρ > 1.120 g/cm(3)) cells is characteristic of SCD. The fluid, self-assembling step-gradients in density created by aqueous multiphase systems (AMPSs) identifies SCD by detecting dense cells. AMPSs separate different forms of red blood cells by density in a microhematocrit centrifuge and provide a visual means to distinguish individuals with SCD from those with normal hemoglobin or with nondisease, sickle-cell trait in under 12 min. Visual evaluation of a simple two-phase system identified the two main subclasses of SCD [homozygous (Hb SS) and heterozygous (Hb SC)] with a sensitivity of 90% (73-98%) and a specificity of 97% (86-100%). A three-phase system identified these two types of SCD with a sensitivity of 91% (78-98%) and a specificity of 88% (74-98%). This system could also distinguish between Hb SS and Hb SC. To the authors' knowledge, this test demonstrates the first separation of cells by density with AMPSs, and the usefulness of AMPSs in point-of-care diagnostic hematology.

A simple, rapid, low-cost diagnostic test for sickle cell disease.

This communication describes a very simple, rapid and inexpensive point-of-care diagnostic test for sickle cell disease (SCD) that can conclusively differentiate between blood samples from normal healthy individuals, sickle cell trait carriers and SCD patients using the characteristic blood stain patterns produced by each sample on paper.