Factors Associated With Performing IPAA After Total Colectomy for Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: IPAA is considered the procedure of choice for restorative surgery after total colectomy for ulcerative colitis. Previous studies have examined the rate of IPAA within individual states but not at the national level in the United States. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the rate of IPAA after total colectomy for ulcerative colitis in a national population and identify factors associated with IPAA. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: This study was performed in the United States. PATIENTS: Patients who were aged 18 years or older and who underwent total colectomy between 2009 and 2019 for a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis were identified within a commercial database. This database excluded patients with public insurance, including all patients older than 65 years with Medicare. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was IPAA. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between covariates and the likelihood of undergoing IPAA. RESULTS: In total, 2816 patients were included, of whom 1414 (50.2%) underwent IPAA, 928 (33.0%) underwent no further surgery, and 474 (16.8%) underwent proctectomy with end ileostomy. Younger age, lower comorbidities, elective case, and laparoscopic approach in the initial colectomy were significantly associated with IPAA but socioeconomic status was not. LIMITATIONS: This retrospective study included only patients with commercial insurance. CONCLUSIONS: A total of 50.2% of patients who had total colectomy for ulcerative colitis underwent IPAA, and younger age, lower comorbidities, and elective cases are associated with a higher rate of IPAA placement. This study emphasizes the importance of ensuring follow-up with colorectal surgeons to provide the option of restorative surgery, especially for patients undergoing urgent or emergent colectomies. See Video Abstract . FACTORES ASOCIADOS CON LA REALIZACIN DE ANASTOMOSIS ANALBOLSA ILEAL DESPUS DE UNA COLECTOMA TOTAL POR COLITIS ULCEROSA: ANTECEDENTES:La anastomosis ileo-anal se considera el procedimiento de elección para la cirugía reparadora tras la colectomía total por colitis ulcerosa. Estudios previos han examinado la tasa de anastomosis ileo-anal dentro de los estados individuales, pero no a nivel nacional en los Estados Unidos.OBJETIVO:Evaluar la tasa de anastomosis bolsa ileal-anal después de la colectomía total para la colitis ulcerosa en una población nacional e identificar los factores asociados con la anastomosis bolsa ileal-anal.DISEÑO:Se trata de un estudio de cohortes retrospectivo.LUGAR:Este estudio se realizó en los Estados Unidos.PACIENTES:Los pacientes que tenían ≥18 años de edad que se sometieron a colectomía total entre 2009 y 2019 para un diagnóstico de colitis ulcerosa fueron identificados dentro de una base de datos comercial. Esta base de datos excluyó a los pacientes con seguro público, incluidos todos los pacientes >65 años con Medicare.MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO PRINCIPALES:El resultado primario fue la anastomosis ileal bolsa-anal. Se utilizó una regresión logística multivariable para evaluar la asociación entre las covariables y la probabilidad de someterse a una anastomosis ileal.RESULTADOS:En total, se incluyeron 2.816 pacientes, de los cuales 1.414 (50,2%) se sometieron a anastomosis ileo-anal, 928 (33,0%) no se sometieron a ninguna otra intervención quirúrgica y 474 (16,8%) se sometieron a proctectomía con ileostomía terminal. La edad más joven, las comorbilidades más bajas, el caso electivo, y el abordaje laparoscópico en la colectomía inicial se asociaron significativamente con la anastomosis ileal bolsa-anal, pero no el estatus socioeconómico.LIMITACIONES:Este estudio retrospectivo incluyó sólo pacientes con seguro comercial.CONCLUSIONES:Un 50,2% de los pacientes se someten a anastomosis ileo-anal y la edad más joven, las comorbilidades más bajas y los casos electivos se asocian con una mayor tasa de colocación de anastomosis ileo-anal. Esto subraya la importancia de asegurar el seguimiento con cirujanos colorrectales para ofrecer la opción de cirugía reparadora, especialmente en pacientes sometidos a colectomías urgentes o emergentes. (Traducción-Dr. Yolanda Colorado ).

Financial Relationships in General Surgery Education: Recent Trends in Industry Payments to General Surgery Residency Leadership.

INTRODUCTION: Residency programs and their directors frequently receive funding from industry payers. Both general surgery residency program directors (PDs) and assistant program directors (APDs) receive industry funding for various reasons, including educational advancement. This study investigates recent trends in industry payments to both PDs and APDs to better understand the financial relationships among leaders in residency education. METHODS: We compared industry payments to general surgery residency PDs and APDs from 2019 to 2021 utilizing the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) open payments database. In addition, secondary analyses were performed among PDs to assess differences based on gender, practicing surgical specialty, and geographical region. RESULTS: During the study period (2019-2021), PDs received payments amounting to 2,882,821 USD. PDs were found to receive more funding than APDs, with each receiving average funding of 10,045 vs. 323 USD (p < 0.01), respectively, over the study period. There was a significant decrease in total payments from 2019 to 2020 (1,512,190 vs. 868,811 USD; p < 0.01). Total payments made in 2021 were similar compared to 2020 (905,836 vs. 868,811 USD; p = 0.1). We found that male PDs received significantly more in-industry payments when compared to female PDs (11,702 USD per PD vs. 3971 USD per PD, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: This study presents initial data that residency program leadership has robust biomedical industry relationships, and further research is warranted to investigate the impacts of these payments on program resources, educational opportunities for residents, and program outcomes. Male PDs received significantly more industry payments when compared to female PDs. Leaders in the surgical training community must cautiously ensure that these industry relationships are appropriately navigated.

Healthcare Disparity Education for Surgical Residents: Progress Made, More Needed.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare disparities are an important determinant of patient outcomes yet are not standardized within surgical resident education. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and design of current healthcare disparities curricula for surgical residents and included a resident-based needs assessment at a single institution. STUDY DESIGN: A national survey evaluating the presence and design of healthcare disparities curricula was distributed to general surgery program directors via the Association of Program Directors in Surgery Listserv. A related survey was administered to all general surgery residents at a single academic institution. RESULTS: One hundred forty-six program directors completed the survey, with 68 (47%) reporting an active curriculum. The most frequently taught topic is regarding patient race as a healthcare disparity, found in 63 (93%) of existing curricula. Fifty-two (76%) of the curricula were implemented within the last 3 years. Of the 78 (53%) programs without a curriculum, 8 (10%) program directors stated that their program would not benefit from one. Thirty-four (45%) of the programs without a curriculum cited institutional support and time as the most common barriers to implementation. Of the 23 residents who completed the survey, 100% desired learning practical knowledge regarding healthcare disparities relating to how race and socioeconomic status affect the clinical outcomes of surgical patients. CONCLUSIONS: Less than half of general surgery training programs have implemented healthcare disparities curricula. Resident preferences for the format and content of curricula may help inform program leaders and lead to comprehensive national standards.

Imposter Syndrome in Surgical Trainees: Clance Imposter Phenomenon Scale Assessment in General Surgery Residents.

BACKGROUND: Imposter syndrome occurs when high-achieving individuals have a pervasive sense of self-doubt combined with fear of being exposed as a fraud, despite objective measures of success. This threatens mental health and well-being. The prevalence and severity of imposter syndrome has not been studied among general surgery residents on a large scale. The primary outcomes of this study were the prevalence and severity of imposter syndrome. STUDY DESIGN: The Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale was administered to residents at 6 academic general surgery residency programs. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify significant differences among groups and predictive characteristics of imposter syndrome. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-four residents completed the assessment (response rate 46.6%; 47.2% were male). Only 22.9% had "none to mild" or "moderate" imposter syndrome. A majority (76%) had "significant" or "severe" imposter syndrome. There were no significant differences in mean scores among male and female residents (p = 0.69). White residents had a mean score of 71.3 and non-White residents had a mean score of 68.3 (p = 0.24). There was no significant difference between PGY1 to PGY5 or research residents (p = 0.72). There were no significant differences based on US Medical Licensing Examination or American Board of Surgery In-Service Training Examination scores (p = 0.18 and p = 0.37, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Imposter syndrome is prevalent among general surgery residents, with 76% of residents reporting either significant or severe imposter syndrome. There were no predictive characteristics based on demographics or academic achievement, suggesting that there is something either inherent to those choosing general surgery training or the general surgery training culture that leads to such substantive levels of imposter syndrome.

Medical Student Selection.

Medical school admissions committees are tasked with fulfilling the values of their institutions through careful recruitment. Making accurate predictions regarding the enrollment behavior of admitted students is critical to intentionally formulating class composition and impacts long-term physician representation.

Choosing surgery as a career: Early results of a longitudinal study of medical students.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have explored the factors associated with the preference of medical students to pursue a specific specialty, and even fewer have observed how these preferences and factors change over time. METHODS: A longitudinal survey of medical students was administered at the beginning of first year, second year, and clerkships from 2013-2016. Surveys included demographics and factors associated with their choice of specialty. RESULTS: Response rates were 78-94%. Students with mentors and research experience in any specialty were 3.4 times (P < .001) more likely to choose surgery by their third year of medical school. Surgical research experience on the first- and second-year surveys was associated with 39 (P < .001) and 10 times (P < .001) greater odds of preferring surgical specialties on their third-year survey. Medical students who had a surgery mentor during the first and second years were associated with 4 (P = .024) and 13 times (P < .001) greater odds of preferring surgical specialties on their third-year survey. CONCLUSION: Students who begin surgical research during their first year and develop relationships with surgeon mentors during their second year are significantly more likely to maintain an interest in surgical specialties.

Educating the surgeon-scientist: A qualitative study evaluating challenges and barriers toward becoming an academically successful surgeon.

BACKGROUND: The advancement of surgical science relies on educating new generations of surgeon-scientists. Career development awards (K Awards) from the National Institutes of Health, often considered a marker of early academic success, are one way physician-scientists may foster skills through a mentored research experience. This study aimed to develop a conceptual framework to understand institutional support and other factors leading to a K Award. METHODS: A national, qualitative study was conducted with academic surgeons. Participants included 15 K Awardees and 12 surgery department Chairs. Purposive sampling ensured a diverse range of experiences. Semistructured, in-depth telephone interviews were conducted. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim, and 2 reviewers analyzed the transcripts using Grounded Theory methodology. RESULTS: Participants described individual and institutional factors contributing to success. K Awardees cited personal factors such as perseverance and team leadership skills. Chairs described the K Awardee as an institutional "investment" requiring protected time for research, financial support, and mentorship. Both K Awardees and Chairs identified a number of challenges unique to the surgeon-scientist, including financial strains and competing clinical demands. CONCLUSION: Institutional support for surgeons pursuing K Awards is a complex investment with significant initial costs to the department. Chairs act as stewards of institutional resources and support those surgeon-scientists most likely to be successful. Although the K Award pathway is one way to develop surgeon-scientists, financial burdens and challenges may limit its usefulness. These findings, however, may better prepare young surgeons to develop career plans and identify new mechanisms for academic productivity.

Current assessment and future directions of surgical skills laboratories.

BACKGROUND: Educational, medicolegal, and financial constraints have pushed surgical residency programs to find alternative methods to operating room teaching for surgical skills training. Several studies have demonstrated that the use of skills laboratories is effective and enhances performance; however, little is known about the facilities available to residents. STUDY DESIGN: A survey was distributed to 40 general surgery program directors who, in an earlier questionnaire, indicated that they had skills laboratory facilities at their institutions. The survey included the following sections: demographics, facilities, administrative infrastructure, curriculum, learners, and opinions/thoughts of program directors. RESULTS: Of the 34 program directors that completed the survey, 76% are from a university program. The average facility is 1400 square feet, and most skills laboratories are located in the hospital. Nearly all skills facilities have dry laboratories (90%), and the most common equipment is box trainers (90%). Average start-up costs were $450,000. Sixty-two percent of programs have a skills curriculum for residents. Responders agreed that skills laboratories have a high value and should be part of residency curricula. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey provide a preliminary view of skills laboratories. There is variation in the size, location, and availability of simulators in skills laboratory facilities. Variations also exist in types of curricula formats, subspecialties who make use of the laboratory, and some administrative approaches. There is strong agreement among respondents that skills laboratories are a necessary and valuable component of residency education. Results also indicated concerns for recruiting faculty to teach in the skills laboratory, securing ongoing funding, and implementing a skills laboratory curriculum.