Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Anal Bioanal Chem ; 416(13): 3127-3137, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38580890

RESUMO

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) represent the largest class of therapeutic protein drug products. mAb glycosylation produces a heterogeneous, analytically challenging distribution of glycoforms that typically should be adequately characterized because glycosylation-based product quality attributes (PQAs) can impact product quality, immunogenicity, and efficacy. In this study, two products were compared using a panel of analytical methods. Two high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) workflows were used to analyze N-glycans, while nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) was used to generate monosaccharide fingerprints. These state-of-the-art techniques were compared to conventional analysis using hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) coupled with fluorescence detection (FLD). The advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed along with a comparison of the identified glycan distributions. The results demonstrated agreement across all methods for major glycoforms, demonstrating how confidence in glycan characterization is increased by combining orthogonal analytical methodologies. The full panel of methods used represents a diverse toolbox that can be selected from based on the needs for a specific product or analysis.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais , Interações Hidrofóbicas e Hidrofílicas , Espectroscopia de Ressonância Magnética , Espectrometria de Massas , Polissacarídeos , Glicosilação , Anticorpos Monoclonais/química , Polissacarídeos/análise , Polissacarídeos/química , Espectrometria de Massas/métodos , Espectroscopia de Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Cromatografia Líquida/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA