RESUMO
The present study was undertaken to determine the pharmacoeconomics of switching from sustained-release morphine tablet to matrix type (MT) of transdermal fontanel or sustained-release Oxycodone tablet. Cost-effective analysis was performed using a simulation model along with decision analysis. The analysis was done from the payer's perspective. The cost-effective ratio/patient of transdermal MT fontanel (22, 539 yen)was lower than that of sustained -release Oxycodone tablet (23, 630 yen), although a sensitivity analysis could not indicate that this result was reliable. These results suggest the possibility that transdermal MT fontanel was much less expensive than a sustained-release Oxycodone tablet.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos Opioides/economia , Fentanila/administração & dosagem , Fentanila/economia , Morfina/administração & dosagem , Morfina/economia , Oxicodona/administração & dosagem , Oxicodona/economia , Administração Cutânea , Análise Custo-Benefício , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Árvores de Decisões , Preparações de Ação Retardada , Humanos , Japão , ComprimidosRESUMO
The contents of pharmacist interventions, which were carried out by the ward pharmacists in their routine pharmacy service activities, were sorted and analyzed to evaluate the contributions of pharmacists. In the ward where pharmacists were stationed, there were a total of 196 cases of pharmacist intervention. The prescription was changed in 170 cases, giving a rate of prescription change of 86.7%. The breakdown of the pharmacist intervention was as follows: "efficacy/safety", 106 cases, followed by "dosage regimen" (48 cases) and "compliance" (10 cases). Cost savings achieved during the investigation period were calculated to be 440,639 yen, and cost avoidance was valued at 1,941,847-3,883,695 yen using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC). The results of the present investigation showed that pharmacists contribute to through not only their pharmacy services, but also through the promotion of proper drug use and risk management, thereby contributing to hospital management through cost savings and avoidance.
Assuntos
Sistemas de Medicação no Hospital , Farmacêuticos , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/economia , Papel Profissional , Redução de Custos , Prescrições de Medicamentos/economia , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Sistemas de Medicação no Hospital/economia , Sistemas de Medicação no Hospital/estatística & dados numéricos , Gestão de RiscosRESUMO
The present study investigated the clinical effects and therapeutic cost of cefazolin (CEZ) and ampicillin/sulbactam (SBT/ABPC) compared to analyze cost-effectiveness for surgical prophylaxis in gastric cancer patients. 157 inpatients who underwent surgery for gastric cancer were investigated. There was no difference between the two groups with regard to sex, age, incidence of complication, stage of cancer, operative time and blood loss, length of hospitalization, the appearance of systematic inflammatory responses syndrome and the prophylactic effect of infection. Meanwhile, decision analysis indicated that the anticipated therapeutic cost per patient in CEZ group was less than that of SBT/ABPC group (USD 142.72 and USD 187.17, respectively). In this case, CEZ use was more cost-effective, insofar as only drug cost was considered.
Assuntos
Ampicilina/economia , Antibioticoprofilaxia/economia , Cefazolina/economia , Gastrectomia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Sulbactam/economia , Ampicilina/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Cefazolina/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Árvores de Decisões , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Japão , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Sulbactam/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
The present study was designed to investigate the effects of prophylactic antibiotic therapy and the cost-effectiveness of Cefazolin (CEZ) and Sulbactam/Ampicillin (SBT/ABPC) in gastric cancer surgery employing clinical pathway. 157 patients (62 in the CEZ group and 95 in the SBT/ABPC group), who underwent surgery for gastric cancer at the First Department of Surgery of our hospital, were investigated. There was no significant difference between the groups with regard to sex, age, incidence of complication, stage of cancer, surgical method, operative time and blood loss, length of hospitalization, the appearance of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), changes body temperature, white blood cell count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), or clinical outcome of postoperative care by a nurse during post-operation for 7 days. The prophylactic effect of infection was also no different between the CEZ (69.4%) and SBT/ABPC (69.5%) groups. In contrast, decision analysis strongly indicated that the anticipate cost of antibiotics was higher in the latter group (yen 20402) than in the CEZ group (yen 15556), suggesting that the prophylactic effect of CEZ may be more cost-effective. Thus, evaluations of pharmacotherapy from the aspect of cost may be one of the important responsibility of hospital pharmacists in the future.
Assuntos
Ampicilina/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia/economia , Cefazolina/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Procedimentos Clínicos , Gastrectomia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Sulbactam/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Ampicilina/economia , Cefazolina/economia , Feminino , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/microbiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/microbiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sulbactam/economiaRESUMO
Recently, adverse reaction of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is the critical problem, although NSAIDs are one of the most commonly used classes of medications worldwide. Therefore, it is worthwhile to investigate the prescription frequency and the factors on adverse reactions of NSAIDs for post-operative pain in orthopedic patients of our hospital. In orthopedic field, loxoprofen was most prescribed in various kinds of NSAIDs. Logistic regression analysis strongly indicated that previous adverse reaction or allergy caused by drugs (not NSAIDs) or food is the important role in the adverse reaction of NSAIDs. In addition, significant correlation was observed between previous illness of gastrointestinal ulcer and gastrointestinal complication of NSAIDs. Moreover, the present study point out that pharmacist clinical intervention against the adverse reaction of NSAIDs may be saved on medical costs. Although further investigation may be needed, these present studies provide the good information for our medication management and instruction tasks (i.e. pharmaceutical care and counseling for inpatients) for post-operative pain of orthopedic patients.