Assessment of Long-term Changes in Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Patients With Prostate Cancer Who Underwent Low-dose-rate Prostate Brachytherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate long-term changes in lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy with iodine-125 (LDR-BT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 313 patients with localized PCa underwent LDR-BT at Gifu University hospital between August 2004 and December 2013. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS), and quality of life due to urinary symptoms (IPSS-QOL) were measured before LDR-BT; at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months after LDR-BT; and annually thereafter. Study endpoints were chronological changes in IPSS, OABSS, and IPSS-QOL compared to pretreatment values. A multivariable nonlinear regression model with robust sandwich estimator evaluated association between outcomes and time with adjustment for covariates. RESULTS: All scores worsened immediately after LDR-BT compared to preoperative scores. However, symptoms improved with time and returned to baseline in 18-36 months. After a 5-year follow-up after LDR-BT, OABSS significantly worsened in almost all patients compared to baseline although there were gradual improvements in less than 5 years after LDR-BT. CONCLUSIONS: Our results may be of clinical importance in selecting treatment modalities for patients with localized PCa and long-term survival after definitive therapy.

Safety and efficacy of intracoronary nicorandil as hyperaemic agent for invasive physiological assessment: a patient-level pooled analysis.

AIMS: Our aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intracoronary (IC) nicorandil as an alternative choice of hyperaemic agent for invasive physiologic studies. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 480 intermediate coronary lesions from 429 patients enrolled from six Japanese and Korean centres were analysed. IC nicorandil showed earlier achievement of hyperaemia (time to the lowest FFR: 18.0 s [1st and 3rd quartile value 15.6-21.5] vs. 44.0 s [36.0-60.0], p<0.001) with similar hyperaemic efficacy, compared with intravenous (IV) adenosine/ATP (FFR 0.82 [0.75-0.87] vs. 0.82 [0.74-0.88], p=0.207). FFR measurements with both agents showed excellent correlation and classification agreement (CA) for FFR ≤0.80 (r=0.941, ICC 0.980, CA 90.8%, kappa=0.814, AUC of nicorandil 0.980, all p<0.001). Only three patients (0.7%) showed changes in classification across the grey zone (0.75-0.80). IC nicorandil produced fewer changes in blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) and showed less chest pain than IV adenosine/ATP (all p<0.001). When comparing ΔFFR according to ΔBP or ΔHR between IV adenosine/ATP and IC nicorandil, there were no correlations, either between ΔFFR and ΔBP (r=-0.114, p=0.091), or between ΔFFR and ΔHR (r=1.000, p=0.151). CONCLUSIONS: Nicorandil IC bolus injection is a simple, safe and effective hyperaemic method for FFR measurement and can be used as a substitute for adenosine.