Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Lancet ; 378(9790): 526-35, 2011 Aug 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21664679

RESUMO

Vaccines--often lauded as one of the greatest public health interventions--are losing public confidence. Some vaccine experts have referred to this decline in confidence as a crisis. We discuss some of the characteristics of the changing global environment that are contributing to increased public questioning of vaccines, and outline some of the specific determinants of public trust. Public decision making related to vaccine acceptance is neither driven by scientific nor economic evidence alone, but is also driven by a mix of psychological, sociocultural, and political factors, all of which need to be understood and taken into account by policy and other decision makers. Public trust in vaccines is highly variable and building trust depends on understanding perceptions of vaccines and vaccine risks, historical experiences, religious or political affiliations, and socioeconomic status. Although provision of accurate, scientifically based evidence on the risk-benefit ratios of vaccines is crucial, it is not enough to redress the gap between current levels of public confidence in vaccines and levels of trust needed to ensure adequate and sustained vaccine coverage. We call for more research not just on individual determinants of public trust, but on what mix of factors are most likely to sustain public trust. The vaccine community demands rigorous evidence on vaccine efficacy and safety and technical and operational feasibility when introducing a new vaccine, but has been negligent in demanding equally rigorous research to understand the psychological, social, and political factors that affect public trust in vaccines.


Assuntos
Saúde Global , Saúde Pública , Opinião Pública , Confiança , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Vacinas/efeitos adversos , Transtorno Autístico/induzido quimicamente , Características Culturais , Surtos de Doenças , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Haemophilus influenzae tipo b , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Índia , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Internacionalidade , Internet , Meios de Comunicação de Massa , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Poliovirus/efeitos adversos , Política , Conservantes Farmacêuticos/efeitos adversos , Saúde Pública/tendências , Risco , Segurança , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Esterilização Reprodutiva , Toxoide Tetânico/efeitos adversos , Timerosal/efeitos adversos , Vacinas/administração & dosagem
3.
Vaccine ; 27(51): 7141-8, 2009 Nov 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19925944

RESUMO

After exposure, human rabies is preventable by prompt application of post-exposure prophylaxis. Historically, the total number of rabies vaccine doses administered during human prophylaxis has decreased, as modern biologics have improved and scientific knowledge has grown. A review of the literature on rabies virus pathogenesis, experimental animal studies, clinical trials, epidemiological surveillance, and economic analyses was conducted to determine the potential utility of reducing the current 5-dose intramuscular series of human rabies vaccine administered in the United States. Based upon the available evidence, a reduced schedule of cell-culture rabies vaccine, administered on days 0, 3, 7, and 14, given in conjunction with rabies immune globulin, was supported and recommended by the United States Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.


Assuntos
Esquemas de Imunização , Profilaxia Pós-Exposição/métodos , Vacina Antirrábica/administração & dosagem , Raiva/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapêutico , Profilaxia Pós-Exposição/economia , Vacina Antirrábica/economia , Estados Unidos
6.
São Paulo; Atheneu; 1979. 540 p. Livroilus.
Monografia em Português | MS | ID: mis-17694
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA