Quantitative Assessment of Surgical Ergonomics in Otolaryngology.

OBJECTIVES: Objective evaluation of the ergonomic risk of common otolaryngology procedures and assessment of work-related musculoskeletal pain and injury. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional intraoperative assessment and survey. SETTING: Department of Otolaryngology at a tertiary children's hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Sixteen otolaryngology attendings, fellows, and residents participated in a blinded study. Intraoperative ergonomics was assessed for tonsillectomies, adenoidectomies, and tympanostomy tube insertions using the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA). Follow-up surveys were sent to all participating surgeons to determine the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain and formal ergonomic training. RESULTS: Zero percent (N = 0/275) of intraoperative observations were found to have a negligible level of ergonomic risk, with 47% low risk, 37% high risk, and 16% very high risk. Tympanostomy tube insertions conferred less risk than tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy, while the use of headlamp or loupes conferred increased risk. Eighty percent of respondents reported having musculoskeletal pain and 40% reported experiencing pain while operating within the past year. The most common area of pain was the cervical spine. No surgeons reported formal ergonomic training. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates an unacceptable level of ergonomic risk for common procedures in otolaryngology. Furthermore, most participants reported experiencing musculoskeletal pain despite the duration of examined procedures being relatively short. The high prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal pain and the lack of ergonomic training in our cohort highlight the need for increased awareness of ergonomics as well as the development of formal ergonomic curricula.

Improving the echocardiographic assessment of pulmonary pressure using the tricuspid regurgitant signal-The "chin" vs the "beard".

AIM: Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is a fundamental investigation for the noninvasive assessment of pulmonary hemodynamics and right heart function. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation and agreement of Doppler calculation of right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) using "chin" and "beard" measurements of tricuspid regurgitant velocity (TRVmax ), with invasive pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) and PVR. METHODS: One hundred patients undergoing right heart catheterisation (RHC) and near simultaneous transthoracic echocardiography were studied. TRVmax was recorded for "chin" measurement (distinct peak TRVmax signal) and where available (63 patients), "beard" measurement (higher indistinct peak TRVmax signal). RESULTS: Measurable TRV signal was obtained in 96 patients. Mean RVSPchin 54.7 ± 22.7 mm Hg and RVSPbeard 68.6 = 23 ± 26.3 mm Hg (P < .001). There was strong correlation between both RVSPchin and RVSPbeard with invasive PASP (Pearson's r = .9, R2  = 0.82, P < .001 - r = .88, R = .78, P < .001, respectively.). Bland-Altman analysis for RVSPchin and RVSPbeard showed a mean bias of -0.5 mm Hg (95% limits of agreement -21.4 to 20.5 mm Hg) and -10.7 (95% LOA -35.5 to 14.2 mm Hg), respectively. Receiver operator characteristics of TRVmax "chin" and "beard" for diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension was assessed with optimal cut-offs being 2.8 m/s (sensitivity 93%, specificity 87%) and 3.2 m/s (sensitivity 91%, specificity 82%), respectively. There was similar correlation between PVRchin and PVRbeard (r = .87, R2  = 0.75, P < .001 and r = .86, R2  = 0.74, P < .001, respectively). At higher PVR, there was overestimation of calculated PVR using PVRbeard . CONCLUSION: The accuracy of noninvasive measurement of right heart pressures is increased using the "chin" in estimation of both RVSP and PVR.