Predictors of False-Negative Focused Assessment With Sonography for Trauma Examination in Pediatric Blunt Abdominal Trauma.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated associations between patient and injury characteristics and false-negative (FN) focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) in pediatric blunt abdominal trauma (BAT). We also evaluated the effects of FN FAST on in-hospital mortality and length of stay (LOS) variables. METHODS: This retrospective cohort studied children younger than 18 years between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2013, with BAT, documented FAST, and pathologic fluid on computed tomography, surgery, or autopsy. Multivariable and bivariate analyses were used to assess associations between FN FAST and patient injury characteristics, mortality, and hospital LOS. RESULTS: A total of 141 pediatric BAT patients with pathologic free fluid were included. There were no patient or injury characteristics, which conferred increased odds of an FN FAST. Splenic and bladder injury were negatively associated with FN FAST odds ratio of 0.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2-0.8) and 0.1 (95% CI, 0-0.8). Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 4 or greater to the abdomen and extremity was negatively associated with FN FAST odds ratio of 0.1 (95% CI, 0-0.3) and 0.3 (95% CI, 0.1-0.9). There was no association between FN FAST and mortality. Patients with an FN FAST had increased hospital LOS after controlling for sex, age, and Injury Severity Score. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians need to be cautious applying a single initial FAST to patients with minor abdominal trauma or with suspected injuries to organs other than the spleen or bladder. Formalized studies to develop risk stratification tools could allow clinicians to integrate FAST into the pediatric patient population in the safest manner possible.

Hand motion analysis for assessment of nursing competence in ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter placement.

INTRODUCTION: Objective measures such as hand motion analysis are needed to assess competency in technical skills, including ultrasound-guided procedures. Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter placement has many potential benefits and is a viable skill for nurses to learn. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility and validity of hand motion analysis for assessment of nursing competence in ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous placement. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study at a tertiary children's hospital. Participants included a convenience sample of nurses with no ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous experience and experts in ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous placement. Nurses completed hand motion analysis before and after participating in a simulation-based ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous placement training program. Experts also completed hand motion analysis to provide benchmark measurements. After training, nurses performed ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous placement in clinical practice and self-reported details of attempts. RESULTS: A total of 21 nurses and 6 experts participated. Prior to the hands-on training session, experts performed significantly better in all hand motion analysis metrics and procedure time. After completion of the hands-on training session, the nurses showed significant improvement in all hand motion analysis metrics and procedure time. Few nurses achieved hand motion analysis metrics within the expert benchmark after completing the hands-on training session with the exception of angiocatheter motion smoothness. In total, 12 nurses self-reported 38 ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous placement attempts in clinical practice with a success rate of 60.5%. DISCUSSION: We demonstrated the feasibility and construct validity of hand motion analysis as an objective assessment of nurse competence in ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous placement. Nurses demonstrated rapid skill acquisition but did not achieve expert-level proficiency.

E-point septal separation: a bedside tool for emergency physician assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction.

OBJECTIVES: Rapid assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) may be critical among emergency department (ED) patients. This study examined the predictive relationship between ED physician performed bedside mitral-valve E-point septal separation (EPSS) measurements to the quantitative, calculated LVEF. We further evaluated the relationship between ED physician visual estimates of global cardiac function (GCF) and calculated LVEF values. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted on a sequential convenience sample of patients receiving comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Three ED ultrasound fellows performed bedside ultrasound examinations to obtain both EPSS measurements and subjective visual GCF estimates. A linear regression analysis was conducted to examine the relation of EPSS to the calculated LVEF from the comprehensive TTE. Agreement (modified Cohen κ) between ED ultrasound fellow GCF estimates and the calculated LVEF was also assessed. RESULTS: Linear regression analyses revealed a significant correlation (r=0.73, P<.001) between bedside EPSS and the calculated LVEF. The sensitivity and specificity of an EPSS measurement of greater than 7 mm for severe systolic dysfunction (LVEF≤30%) were 100.0% (95% confidence interval, 62.9-100.0) and 51.6% (95% confidence interval, 38.6-64.5), respectively. Subjective estimates of GCF were moderately correlated with calculated LVEF (Cohen κ=0.58). CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of EPSS by ED physicians were significantly associated with the calculated measurements of LVEF from comprehensive TTE. Subjective visual estimates of GCF, however, demonstrated only moderate agreement with the calculated LVEF. An EPSS measurement greater than 7 mm was uniformly sensitive at identifying patients with severely reduced LVEF.