Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Urinary Tract Injury: Experience in a Health Maintenance Organization.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence, detection, characteristics, and management of urinary tract injury in a cohort undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy, and to identify potential risk factors for urinary tract injury with laparoscopic hysterectomy. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Kaiser Permanente San Diego Medical Center, 2001 to 2012. PATIENTS: Women who underwent attempted laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications. INTERVENTIONS: Total laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Demographic and clinical characteristics, surgical techniques, and perioperative complications were abstracted from the medical record. Multivariable logistic regression analysis assessed independent risk factors for ureteral or bladder injury. RESULTS: A total of 3523 patients (mean age, 45.9 ± 8.0 years; median parity, 2; range, 0-10), with a median body mass index (BMI) of 29 kg/m(2) (range, 16-72 kg/m(2)), underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy; 20% had intraoperative cystoscopy. The incidence of urinary tract injury was 1.3% (46 of 3523); of the 46 patients with injuries, 19 (0.54%) had ureteral injuries, 25 (0.71%) had bladder injuries, and 2 (0.06%) had both types. Of the 21 ureteral injuries, 6 (29%) were diagnosed intraoperatively and 15 (71%) were diagnosed postoperatively, including 4 with normal intraoperative cystoscopy. Of the 27 bladder injuries, 23 (85%) were identified intraoperatively. In multivariable logistic analysis, a BMI of 26 to 30 kg/m(2) (compared with >30 kg/m(2)) was associated with an increased risk of ureteral injury, and a BMI ≤25 kg/m(2) (compared with >30 kg/m(2)) and the presence of endometriosis were associated with an increased risk of bladder injury. CONCLUSION: Urinary tract injury occurred in 1.3% of laparoscopic hysterectomies, with ureteral injuries almost as common as bladder injuries. Normal intraoperative cystoscopy findings did not exclude the presence of ureteral injury.

The rate, pattern, and cost of use of antiparkinsonian agents among patients treated for schizophrenia in a managed care setting.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the use and economic cost of antiparkinsonian agents during the medication management of patients diagnosed with schizophrenic disorders in a naturalistic healthcare setting. DESIGN: Cross-sectional retrospective analysis of 1-year (1999) administrative data from a large managed care organization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were 1938 adults who were treated for a schizophrenic disorder. Monthly per patient utilization rate and cost of antiparkinsonian agents, and the proportion of the total psychiatric medication costs attributed to the antiparkinsonian agents, were compared across antipsychotic medications (typical, atypical, olanzapine, risperidone), age, sex, and diagnostic subtype. RESULTS: About one third (39%) of the patients were treated with typical antipsychotics only, and half of them (51%) received antiparkinsonian agents. Those treated with atypical antipsychotics only (41%) were considerably less likely to receive antiparkinsonian agents (25%), and the rate of use differed by atypical type such that risperidone-treated patients were more likely to receive antiparkinsonian agents than those treated with olanzapine. Lower utilization rates of antiparkinsonian agents were also found among patients age 75 years or older, and among those diagnosed with a schizoaffective disorder. Average monthly per patient cost of antiparkinsonian agents was 3.0 dollars, constituting 2.6% of the monthly expenditure on all psychiatric medications. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive use of antiparkinsonian agents differs widely among patients who are treated with typical or atypical antipsychotic drugs, and differs between types of atypical antipsychotics. The choice of atypical antipsychotics that have a lower liability for extrapyramidal symptoms may assist in optimizing the long-term functional outcomes of schizophrenia patients.

Retrospective cohort study of diabetes mellitus and antipsychotic treatment in a geriatric population in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to investigate risk of diabetes among elderly patients during treatment with antipsychotic medications. DESIGN: We conducted a longitudinal, retrospective study assessing the incidence of new prescription claims for antihyperglycemic agents during antipsychotic therapy. SETTING: Prescription claims from the AdvancePCS claim database were followed for 6 to 9 months. PARTICIPANTS: Study participants consisted of patients in the United States aged 60+ and receiving antipsychotic monotherapy. The following cohorts were studied: an elderly reference population (no antipsychotics: n = 1,836,799), those receiving haloperidol (n = 6481) or thioridazine (n = 1658); all patients receiving any conventional antipsychotic monotherapy (n = 11,546), clozapine (n = 117), olanzapine (n = 5382), quetiapine (n = 1664), and risperidone (n = 12,244), and all patients receiving any atypical antipsychotic monotherapy (n = 19,407). MEASUREMENTS: We used Cox proportional hazards regression to determine the risk ratio of diabetes for antipsychotic cohorts relative to the reference population. Covariates included sex and exposure duration. RESULTS: New antihyperglycemic prescription rates were higher in each antipsychotic cohort than in the reference population. Overall rates were no different between atypical and conventional antipsychotic cohorts. Among individual antipsychotic cohorts, rates were highest among patients treated with thioridazine (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1- 5.7), lowest with quetiapine (95% CI, 1.3-2.9), and intermediate with haloperidol, olanzapine, and risperidone. Among atypical cohorts, only risperidone users had a significantly higher risk (95% CI, 1.05-1.60; P = 0.016) than for haloperidol. Conclusions about clozapine were hampered by the low number of patients. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that diabetes risk is elevated among elderly patients receiving antipsychotic treatment. However, causality remains to be demonstrated. As a group, the risk for atypical antipsychotic users was not significantly different than for users of conventional antipsychotics.