Treatment Facility Case Volume and Disparities in Outcomes of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Cases.

INTRODUCTION: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a life-threatening, prenatally diagnosed congenital anomaly. We aim to characterize care and outcomes of infants with CDH in Texas and the impact of treating facilities volume of care. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using a state-wide Hospital Inpatient Discharge Public Use Data File was conducted (2013-2021). Neonates and infants <1 year of age were included using CDH ICD-9/ICD-10 codes. Neonates transferred to an outside hospital were excluded to avoid double-counting. Descriptive statistics, chi-square and logistic regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: Of 1314 CDH patient encounters identified, 728 (55%) occurred at 5 higher volume centers (HVC, >75 cases), 326 (25%) at 9 mid-volume centers (MVC, 20-75 cases) and 268 (20%) at 79 low volume centers (LVC, <20 cases). HVC had lower mortality rates (18%, MVC 22% vs LVC 27%; p = 0.011) despite treating sicker patients (extreme illness severity: HVC 71%, MVC 62% vs LVC 50%; p < 0.001) with longer length-of-stay (p < 0.001). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was used in 136 (10%) and provided primarily at HVC. LVC treated proportionately more non-white Hispanic patients (p < 0.001) and patients from counties along the Mexican border (p < 0.001). The predicted probability of mortality in CDH patients decreases with higher treatment facility CDH case volume, with a 0.5% decrease in the odds of mortality for every additional CDH case treated (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated in HVC have significantly lower mortality despite increased severity. Our data suggest minority populations may be disproportionately treated at LVC associated with worse outcomes. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective Prognosis Study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Ancillary documents for NIH grant applications: The pages beyond the science.

Preparing a grant proposal is no small feat, especially for research (R-series) grants from the National Institutes of Health. The National Institutes of Health is the largest public funder of biomedical research in the world, and as such, procuring a research grant from the National Institutes of Health is one of the ultimate benchmarks of success for a surgeon-scientist. Most investigators are familiar with the page limits for most R-series grants (12 pages for an R01 and 6 pages for an R21), with the addition of a single page allotted for the specific aims. Interestingly, despite the usual focus on the aforementioned research section, the rest of the application can routinely consist of an additional 100 to 150 pages, which means that pages allotted for the specific aims and research strategy represent only 10% of the complete application package. For busy surgeons, it is this abundance of ancillary documentation that can make preparing a research grant particularly onerous. Fortunately, for some, support exists within the department to help prepare much of this documentation by drawing from previous sources, templates, and boilerplate language that has been developed. Although these resources can significantly reduce the burden on individual investigators, there is a danger of leaning on generalized templates that can dilute the message of the overall grant proposal and introduce extraneous or incorrect information that can ultimately impact the cohesiveness and ultimately the competitiveness of the grant. The focus of this article is to educate surgeon-scientists regarding the purpose and importance of the ancillary information required for National Institutes of Health research grants and how to make the most of institutional resources while tailoring these materials to create a cohesive, competitive grant application.

Writing an effective National Institutes of Health (NIH) budget: How to get the money for your science.

In the scheme of developing an application for funding from any federal or foundation source, it is reasonable to place significant attention on the science. However, it is also imperative to remember that your budget is what will provide the resources to make sure you can complete your proposed investigations and, as such, deserves appropriate consideration. In the competitive arena of extramural funding, funding agencies are incentivized to ensure that the funds committed to research will yield maximum impact. A well-thought-out budget demonstrates to the funding agency 2 key factors: (1) that you understand the needs of the project and (2) you have a realistic expectation of the project costs. When these 2 things are communicated to the funding agency, in addition to the significance of your science, it is more likely that you will receive the budget you request. Herein, we put forth the fundamentals for preparing your budget and the nuances that may help you not only be in compliance but also improve your chances of success. This article will discuss issues to consider when designing a budget for large research grants, using the NIH R&R Budget as a prototype.

Top ten strategies to enhance grant-writing success.

Mastering the art of grant writing is one of the most essential skills to obtaining research funding. Given the importance of pursuing high-quality surgical research and supporting the academic goals of surgeon-scientists, ensuring that surgeons have the necessary skills to write effective and successful grants is of paramount importance. In this article, we present 10 strategies for composing a strong research grant application. These strategies apply to federal or nongovernmental funding agencies and are broadly relevant to basic, translational, and clinical investigators. We believe these recommendations can help surgeon-scientists be effective grant writers and compete successfully for research funding.

Computational Assessment of Valvular Dysfunction in Discrete Subaortic Stenosis: A Parametric Study.

PURPOSE: Discrete subaortic stenosis (DSS) is a left-ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction caused by a membranous lesion. DSS is associated with steep aortoseptal angles (AoSAs) and is a risk factor for aortic regurgitation (AR). However, the etiology of AR secondary to DSS remains unknown. This study aimed at quantifying computationally the impact of AoSA steepening and DSS on aortic valve (AV) hemodynamics and AR. METHODS: An LV geometry reconstructed from cine-MRI data was connected to an AV geometry to generate a unified 2D LV-AV model. Six geometrical variants were considered: unobstructed (CTRL) and DSS-obstructed LVOT (DSS), each reflecting three AoSA variations (110°, 120°, 130°). Fluid-structure interaction simulations were run to compute LVOT flow, AV leaflet dynamics, and regurgitant fraction (RF). RESULTS: AoSA steepening and DSS generated vortex dynamics alterations and stenotic flow conditions. While the CTRL-110° model generated the highest degree of leaflet opening asymmetry, DSS preferentially altered superior leaflet kinematics, and caused leaflet-dependent alterations in systolic fluttering. LVOT steepening and DSS subjected the leaflets to increasing WSS overloads (up to 94% increase in temporal shear magnitude), while DSS also increased WSS bidirectionality on the inferior leaflet belly (+ 0.30-point in oscillatory shear index). Although AoSA steepening and DSS increased diastolic transvalvular backflow, regurgitant fractions (RF < 7%) remained below the threshold defining clinical mild AR. CONCLUSIONS: The mechanical interactions between AV leaflets and LVOT steepening/DSS hemodynamic derangements do not cause AR. However, the leaflet WSS abnormalities predicted in those anatomies provide new support to a mechanobiological etiology of AR secondary to DSS.

An algorithmic approach to an impactful specific aims page.

The most vital part of a grant is the specific-aims section. As the leading section of the proposal, the specific-aims section serves as a 1-page synopsis that needs to gain the attention and interest of the reviewers. It must present a compelling case for the importance of the proposed work and provide a convincing rationale and evidence that you and your team are the best people to carry out the project. Developing the specific-aims page is usually the first stage of the grant writing process, as it provides an overview of the proposal and research directions. Furthermore, it can be instrumental in getting external feedback from program officers, collaborators, and others as the grant develops. The process of writing the Specific Aims page requires that one touch on each of the elements that comprise the scoring criteria of the proposal (eg, significance, innovation, investigator(s), approach, and environment) and succinctly introduce all the main topics that will be addressed in the application, but focus especially on the knowledge gap and the importance of filling it, the central hypothesis and the aims that will address it, and the overall impact of the work. This page sets a clear framework for writing the rest of the grant. In this article, we present a set of recommendations and guidelines on how to utilize an algorithmic approach to develop the specific-aims page, what elements to include, and how to maximize its value to create a competitive grant.

Impact of Aortoseptal Angle Abnormalities and Discrete Subaortic Stenosis on Left-Ventricular Outflow Tract Hemodynamics: Preliminary Computational Assessment.

Discrete subaortic stenosis (DSS) is an obstruction of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) due to the formation of a fibromuscular membrane upstream of the aortic valve. DSS is a major risk factor for aortic regurgitation (AR), which often persists after surgical resection of the membrane. While the etiology of DSS and secondary AR is largely unknown, the frequent association between DSS and aortoseptal angle (AoSA) abnormalities has supported the emergence of a mechanobiological pathway by which hemodynamic stress alterations on the septal wall could trigger a biological cascade leading to fibrosis and membrane formation. The resulting LVOT flow disturbances could activate the valve endothelium and contribute to AR. In an effort to assess this hypothetical mechano-etiology, this study aimed at isolating computationally the effects of AoSA abnormalities on septal wall shear stress (WSS), and the impact of DSS on LVOT hemodynamics. Two-dimensional computational fluid dynamics models featuring a normal AoSA (N-LV), a steep AoSA (S-LV), and a steep AoSA with a DSS lesion (DSS-LV) were designed to compute the flow in patient-specific left ventricles (LVs). Boundary conditions consisted of transient velocity profiles at the mitral inlet and LVOT outlet, and patient-specific LV wall motion. The deformation of the DSS lesion was computed using a two-way fluid-structure interaction modeling strategy. Turbulence was accounted for via implementation of the k-ω turbulence model. While the N-LV and S-LV models generated similar LVOT flow characteristics, the DSS-LV model resulted in an asymmetric LVOT jet-like structure, subaortic stenotic conditions (up to 2.4-fold increase in peak velocity, 45% reduction in effective jet diameter vs. N-LV/S-LV), increased vorticity (2.8-fold increase) and turbulence (5- and 3-order-of-magnitude increase in turbulent kinetic energy and Reynolds shear stress, respectively). The steep AoSA subjected the septal wall to a 23% and 69% overload in temporal shear magnitude and gradient, respectively, without any substantial change in oscillatory shear index. This study reveals the existence of WSS overloads on septal wall regions prone to DSS lesion formation in steep LVOTs, and the development of highly turbulent, stenotic and asymmetric flow in DSS LVOTs, which support a possible mechano etiology for DSS and secondary AR.

Timing of Prenatal Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Assessment of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.

INTRODUCTION: Fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been used to stratify severity of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) after ultrasound diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to determine if timing of MRI influenced prediction of severity of outcome in CDH. METHODS: A single institution retrospective review of all CDH referred to our institution from February 2004 to May 2017 was performed. Patients were included if they underwent at least 2 fetal MRIs prior to delivery. Prenatal MRI indices including observed-to-expected total fetal lung volume (o/e TFLV) were evaluated. Indices were categorized by trimester, either 2nd (20-27 weeks gestation) or 3rd trimester (>28 weeks gestation) and further analyzed for outcome predictability. Primary outcomes were survival, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and pulmonary hypertension (PAH). Student t test and logistic and linear regression were used for data analyses. RESULTS: Of 256 fetuses evaluated for CDH, 197 were further characterized by MRI with 57 having both an MRI in the 2nd and 3rd trimesters. There was an average of 9.95 weeks (±4.3) between the 1st and 2nd MRI. Second trimester o/e TFLV was the only independent predictor of survival by logistic regression (OR 0.890, p < 0.01). Third trimester MRI derived lung volumes were associated with, and independent predictors of, severity of PAH and need for ECMO. Interval TFLV growth was a strong predictor of PAH postnatally (OR 0.361, p < 0.01). Overall cohort survival was 79%. CONCLUSION: Accuracy of MRI lung volumes to predict outcomes is dependent on the -gestational age at the time of exam. While MRI lung volumes at either the 2nd or 3rd trimester are predictive of morbidity, 2nd trimester lung volumes strongly correlated with mortality.

Fetal echocardiography (ECHO) in assessment of structural heart defects in congenital diaphragmatic hernia patients: Is early postnatal ECHO necessary for ECMO candidacy?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of fetal echocardiogram (ECHO) for detecting cardiac structural anomalies that may impact Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) candidacy in infants with Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia (CDH). METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on fetuses with CDH (January 2007-June 2017). Inclusion criteria were inborn and at least one prenatal and postnatal ECHO. ECHOs were evaluated for structural heart defects. Primary outcomes were accuracy of prenatal fetal ECHO and identify differences between prenatal and postnatal ECHO. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square analysis were performed. RESULTS: 131 inborn patients were identified. Mean gestational age of fetal ECHO was 26.6 ±â€¯5.5 weeks. The median time to postnatal ECHO was DOL 1 [0-30]. Fetal ECHO had 92% accuracy, 83% sensitivity, 93% specificity, PPV of 95%, NPV of 92%, and a 90% accuracy for visualization of at least one pulmonary vein into the left atrium on the contralateral (non-CDH) side. Thirty-five percent of patients received ECMO, and 26% had an associated cardiac anomaly. All ECMO patients had an accurate structural fetal ECHO. CONCLUSION: Fetal ECHO is sufficient for identifying major structural heart defects at large volume centers with trained pediatric cardiologists and may be used to guide clinical management, particularly in regards to ECMO candidacy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The Future of Basic Science in Academic Surgery: Identifying Barriers to Success for Surgeon-scientists.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the challenges confronting surgeons performing basic science research in today's academic surgery environment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Multiple studies have identified challenges confronting surgeon-scientists and impacting their ability to be successful. Although these threats have been known for decades, the downward trend in the number of successful surgeon-scientists continues. Clinical demands, funding challenges, and other factors play important roles, but a rigorous analysis of academic surgeons and their experiences regarding these issues has not previously been performed. METHODS: An online survey was distributed to 2504 members of the Association for Academic Surgery and Society of University Surgeons to determine factors impacting success. Survey results were subjected to statistical analyses. We also reviewed publicly available data regarding funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). RESULTS: NIH data revealed a 27% decline in the proportion of NIH funding to surgical departments relative to total NIH funding from 2007 to 2014. A total of 1033 (41%) members responded to our survey, making this the largest survey of academic surgeons to date. Surgeons most often cited the following factors as major impediments to pursuing basic investigation: pressure to be clinically productive, excessive administrative responsibilities, difficulty obtaining extramural funding, and desire for work-life balance. Surprisingly, a majority (68%) did not believe surgeons can be successful basic scientists in today's environment, including departmental leadership. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified important barriers that confront academic surgeons pursuing basic research and a perception that success in basic science may no longer be achievable. These barriers need to be addressed to ensure the continued development of future surgeon-scientists.

The pediatric surgeon's road to research independence: utility of mentor-based National Institutes of Health grants.

BACKGROUND: The current research environment for academic surgeons demands that extramural funding be obtained. Financial support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is historically the gold standard for funding in the biomedical research community, with the R01 funding mechanism viewed as indicator of research independence. The NIH also supports a mentor-based career development mechanism (K-series awards) in order to support early-stage investigators. The goal of this study was to investigate the grants successfully awarded to pediatric surgeon-scientists and then determine the success of the K-series award recipients at achieving research independence. METHODS: In July 2012, all current members of the American Pediatric Surgery Association (APSA) were queried in the NIH database from 1988-2012 through the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools. The following factors were analyzed: type of grant, institution, amount of funding, and funding institute or center. RESULTS: Among current APSA members, there have been 83 independent investigators receiving grants, representing 13% of the current APSA membership, with 171 independent grants funded through various mechanisms. Six percent currently have active NIH funding, with $7.2 million distributed in 2012. There have been 28 K-series grants awarded. Of the recipients of expired K08 awards, 39% recipients were subsequently awarded an R01 grant. A total of 63% of these K-awarded investigators transitioned to an independent NIH award mechanism. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric surgeon-scientists successfully compete for NIH funding. Our data suggest that although the K-series funding mechanism is not the only path to research independence, over half of the pediatric surgeons who receive a K-award are successful in the transition to independent investigator.