Dose Optimization of Perfusion-derived Response Assessment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Transarterial Chemoembolization: Comparison of Volume Perfusion CT and Iodine Concentration.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: We assessed the value of iodine concentration (IC) as a perfusion-derived response marker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in comparison with volume perfusion computed tomography (VPCT) parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one HCC lesions in 32 patients examined before and after TACE were analyzed retrospectively. VPCT-parameters were calculated and lesion iodine-maps were computed using subtraction of the baseline and the scan 7 seconds after aortic peak enhancement from the corresponding 80 kVp-VPCT data set. Modified RECIST was used as standard response criteria. Comparisons were performed using Student's t test for normal distributed data and Mann-Whitney U test for non-normal distributed data. Additionally, correlation analysis, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and interreader agreement were assessed. RESULTS: In responding lesions, mean pre-TACE IC and blood flow (BF) were 131.2 mg/100 mL and 96.7 mL/100 mL/min, decreasing to IC 25.6 mg/100 mL (P < 0.001) and BF 28.5 mL/100 mL/min (P < 0.001) post-TACE. In nonresponding lesions, the values remained almost unchanged: pre-TACE: mean BF 79.3 mL/100 mL/min and mean IC 90.4 mg/100 mL; post-TACE: mean BF 71.3 mL/100 mL/min (n.s.) and mean IC 105.4 mg/100 mL (n.s.). Differences in IC-values revealed a high sensitivity/specificity of 96.7%/81.8%. IC and VPCT-parameters showed strong, positive correlations. Mean volume CT dose index for VPCT was 63.4 mGy and 4.9 mGy for iodine maps. CONCLUSION: Thus, IC is a meaningful perfusion marker for local therapy response monitoring in HCC that can be acquired with low radiation dose. This information is important for further therapy response applications using dual and single energy CT.

C-arm computed tomography and volume perfusion computed tomography (VPCT)-based assessment of blood volume changes in hepatocellular carcinoma in prediction of midterm tumor response to transarterial chemoembolization: a single center retrospective trial.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate immediate changes in perfusion parameters in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in C-arm computed tomography (CT) and volume perfusion CT (VPCT) and prediction of midterm tumor response. METHODS: Twenty-five patients (median age 66, range 61 to 75 years) with 62 HCC lesions undergoing TACE received immediate pre- and post-interventional assessment by C-arm CT and VPCT. Cross-sectional imaging was analyzed at baseline and approximately 12 weeks after TACE according to modified RECIST criteria. Outcome was defined as objective response (OR, > 30 % reduction of viable tumor) or non-OR. Perfusion parameters were evaluated in C-arm CT [parenchymal blood volume (PBV)] and VPCT [blood volume (BV) and blood flow (BF)]. Ratios of perfusion parameters before and after TACE within the tumor and the non-affected liver parenchyma were calculated. RESULTS: Correlation between tumor PBV and BV revealed a moderate correlation (rho = 0.45, p = 0.005). In non-affected liver parenchyma, a significant decrease in PBV was seen, compared to a significant increase in BF and BV. Perfusion ratios in HCC lesions were significantly (p < 0.05) increased in OR group compared to non-OR patients in C-arm CT and VPCT: PBV ratio (0.95 (0.06) to 0.67 (0.38), BV ratio 0.63 (0.34) to 0.15 (0.6), and BF ratio 0.6 (0.32) to 0.22 (0.51). Logistic regression including PBV and BF allowed prediction of OR (sensitivity 88 %/specificity of 83 %). CONCLUSIONS: Perfusion parameters acquired by C-arm CT and VPCT cannot simply be substituted by each other, but show similar capability in prediction of midterm tumor response.

Estimation of radiation exposure of 128-slice 4D-perfusion CT for the assessment of tumor vascularity.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to estimate the effective dose of 4D-Perfusion-CT protocols of the lung, liver, and pelvis for the assessment of tumor vascularity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An Alderson-Rando phantom equipped with thermoluminescent dosimeters was used to determine the effective dose values of 4D-Perfusion-CT. Phantom measurements were performed on a 128-slice single-source scanner in adaptive 4D-spiral-mode with bidirectional table movement and a total scan range of 69 mm over a time period of nearly 120 seconds (26 scans). Perfusion measurements were simulated for the lung, liver, and pelvis under the following conditions: lung (80 kV, 60 mAs), liver (80 kV/80 mAs and 80 kV/120 mAs), pelvis (100 kV/80 mAs and 100 kV/120 mAs). RESULTS: Depending on gender, the evaluated body region and scan protocol, an effective whole-body dose between 2.9-12.2 mSv, was determined. The radiation exposure administered to gender-specific organs like the female breast tissue (lung perfusion) or to the ovaries (pelvic perfusion) led to an increase in the female specific dose by 86% and 100% in perfusion scans of the lung and the pelvis, respectively. CONCLUSION: Due to a significant radiation dose of 4D-perfusion-CT protocols, the responsible use of this new promising technique is mandatory. Gender- and organ-specific differences should be considered for indication and planning of tumor perfusion scans.

Semi-automatic assessment of global left ventricular function and left ventricular parameters with dual-source computed tomography: comparison with invasive angiography.

This study assesses the global left ventricular function and volumes using dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) with improved temporal resolution (83 ms) by use of a semi-automatic software tool in comparison to invasive angiography (IVA). One hundred patients scheduled for invasive coronary angiography because of suspected or known coronary artery disease (80 men; 20 women, mean age 62 +/- 10 years) were additionally examined by DSCT. Global left ventricular function (LVF), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), end-systolic volume (LVESV), and stroke volume (SV) were calculated by the use of semi-automatic post-processing software and results compared with those of IVA. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a good concordance between DSCT and IVA in terms of LVF: Pearson's r 0.78, confidence interval [CI] 0.68-0.86, P < 0.0001, bias 7.1% +/- 9.1%. The same was true for LVESV (Pearson's r 0.78, CI 0.67-0.85, P < 0.0001, bias 15.0 +/- 21.0 ml), whereas the agreement for LVEDV and SV was only moderate (LVEDV: Pearson's r 0.59, CI 0.43-0.72, P < 0.0001, bias 13.0 +/- 18.1 ml; SV: Pearson's r 0.47, CI 0.28-0.62, P < 0.0001, bias -1.4 +/- 28.4 ml). Semi-automatic evaluation of left ventricular parameters with DSCT revealed good correlation for LVF and LVESV, whereas LVEDV and SV showed only a moderate correlation. Moreover, LVF is systematically underestimated by DSCT.