Influence of the introduction of caseload requirements on indication for visceral cancer surgery in Switzerland.

BACKGROUND: In 2013 Swiss health authorities implemented annual hospital caseload requirements (CR) for five areas of visceral surgery. We assess the impact of the implementation of CR on indication for surgery in esophageal, pancreatic and rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of national registry data of all inpatient admissions between January 1st, 2005 and December 31st, 2015. Primary end-point was the age-adjusted resection rate for esophageal, pancreatic and rectal cancer among patients with at least one cancer-specific hospitalization per year. We calculated age-adjusted rate ratios for period effects before and after implementation of CR and odds ratios (OR) based on a generalized estimation equation. A relative increase of 5% in age-adjusted relative risk was set a priori as relevant from a health policy perspective. RESULTS: Age-adjusted resection rates before and after the implementation of CR were 0.12 and 0.13 (Relative Risk [RR] 1.08; 95%-Confidence Interval [CI] 0.85-1.36) in esophageal cancer, 0.22 and 0.26 (RR 1.17; 95%-CI 0.85-1.58) in pancreatic cancer and 0.38 and 0.43 (RR 1.14; 95%-CI 0.99-1.30) in rectal cancer. In adjusted models OR for resection after the implementation of CR were 1.40 (95%-CI 1.24-1.58) in esophageal cancer, 1.05 (95%-CI 0.96-1.15) in pancreatic cancer and 0.92 (95%-CI 0.87-0.97) in rectal cancer. CONCLUSION: Implementation of CR was associated with an increase of resection rates above the a priori set margins in all resections groups. In adjusted models, odds for resection were significantly higher for esophageal cancer, while they remained unchanged for pancreatic and decreased for rectal cancer.

Costs versus earnings in colon surgery and coronary artery bypass grafting under a prospective payment system: Sufficient financial incentives to reduce surgical site infections?

Based on a surgical site infection (SSI) cohort at an academic center, we showed a median potentially preventable loss per non-SSI case of $17,916 in colon surgery and of $34,741 in coronary artery bypass grafting.

High-resolution standardization reduces delay due to workflow disruptions in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Optimal resource utilization in high-cost environments like operating theatres is fundamental in today's cost constrained health care systems. Interruptions of the surgical workflow, i.e. microcomplications (MC), lead to prolonged procedure times and higher costs and can be indicative of surgical mistakes. Reducing MC can improve operating room efficiency and prevent intraoperative complications. We, therefore, aimed to evaluate the impact of a high-resolution standardized laparoscopic cholecystectomy protocol (HRSL) on operative time and intraoperative interruptions in a teaching hospital. METHODS: HRSL consisted of a detailed stepwise protocol for the procedure, supported by a teaching video, both to be reviewed as mandatory preparation by each team member before surgery. Audio-video records of laparoscopic cholecystectomies were reviewed regarding type, frequency and duration of MC before and after implementation of HRSL. RESULTS: Thirty-nine (20 control and 19 HRSL) audio-video records of laparoscopic cholecystectomies with a total duration of 51.36 h (28.92 pre 22.44 post) were reviewed. The majority of operations (86%) were performed by teams who had completed less than 10 procedures together previously. Communication-related interruptions and instrument changes accounted for the majority of MC. Median frequency and duration of MC were 95 events/h and 15.6 min/h, respectively, of surgery pre-intervention. With HRSL this was reduced to 76 events/h and 10.6 min/h of operating. In multivariable analysis, HRSL was an independent predictor for shorter delay and lower frequency of MC [percentage decrease 27% (95% CI 18-35%), resp. 30% (95% CI 19-40%)]. Procedure-related risk factors for the longer delay due to MC in multivariable analysis were less experience of the surgeon and intraoperative adhesiolysis. CONCLUSIONS: HRSL is effective in reducing delays due to MC in a teaching institution with limited team experience. These findings should be tested in larger potentially cluster-randomized controlled trials. The trial has been registered with clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03329859.

Assessment of intraoperative liver deformation during hepatic resection: prospective clinical study.

BACKGROUND: The implementation of intraoperative navigation in liver surgery is handicapped by intraoperative organ shift, tissue deformation, the absence of external landmarks, and anatomical differences in the vascular tree. To investigate the impact of surgical manipulation on the liver surface and intrahepatic structures, we conducted a prospective clinical trial. METHODS: Eleven consecutive patients [4 female and 7 male, median age = 67 years (range = 54-80)] with malignant liver disease [colorectal metastasis (n = 9) and hepatocellular cancer (n = 2)] underwent hepatic resection. Pre- and intraoperatively, all patients were studied by CT-based 3D imaging and assessed for the potential value of computer-assisted planning. The degree of liver deformation was demonstrated by comparing pre- and intraoperative imaging. RESULTS: Intraoperative CT imaging was successful in all patients. We found significant deformation of the liver. The deformation of the segmental structures is reflected by the observed variation of the displacements. There is no rigid alignment of the pre- and intraoperative organ positions due to overall deflection of the liver. Locally, a rigid alignment of the anatomical structure can be achieved with less than 0.5 cm discrepancy relative to a segmental unit of the liver. Changes in total liver volume range from -13 to +24%, with an average absolute difference of 7%. CONCLUSIONS: These findings are fundamental for further development and optimization of intraoperative navigation in liver surgery. In particular, these data will play an important role in developing automation of intraoperative continuous registration. This automation compensates for liver shift during surgery and permits real-time 3D visualization of navigation imaging.