Annual costs among patients with major depressive disorder and the impact of key clinical events.

BACKGROUND: The economic burden of major depressive disorder (MDD) is substantial and increasing; however, the impact of key clinical events (eg, hospitalization, suicide attempt/ideation, and treatment changes) on health care resource use and costs are less established. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the health care utilization and costs among patients with MDD, particularly for those with key clinical events. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, administrative health care claims from the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database were used to identify adults with a new diagnosis of MDD (January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2017). Patients with 12 months or more of continuous health care coverage before and after the initial medical claim with an MDD diagnosis (index date) and 1 or more pharmacy claims for an antidepressant within 60 days of any qualifying medical claim were included. The effect of post-index date key clinical events (eg, treatment changes, moderate to severe MDD, MDD-related emergency department [ED] visits, MDD-related hospitalizations, suicide attempt/ideation, severe mental health disorder, use of brain stimulation therapies) on all-cause total costs was assessed. Actual allcause costs were summarized descriptively and reported per patient per year (PPPY). Multivariable analyses compared differences in all-cause costs during follow-up, depending on whether patients experienced a key clinical event. RESULTS: A total of 455,082 patients met eligibility criteria. The average age was 41 years and 64% of patients were female. Mean (SD) all-cause PPPY costs during the follow-up period were $10,074 ($25,694). The most common key clinical events were treatment changes, moderate to severe MDD diagnosis, and MDD-related ED visits. The majority of patients (90.1%) experienced at least 1 treatment change, which was most commonly treatment discontinuation. Generally, mean costs for up to 90 days following an event were higher than those preceding the event. In multivariable analyses, patients with any key clinical events had 51% higher PPPY allcause health care costs compared with those who did not have any key clinical events. Compared with patients without key clinical events, follow-up costs were more than 2 times higher among patients with severe mental health disorder, MDD-related hospitalization, and suicide attempt/ideation. The most impactful key clinical event was treatment with electroconvulsive therapy, vagal nerve stimulation, or transcranial magnetic stimulation, in which patients incurred 4.3 times higher follow-up costs than those who did not receive one of these treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Key clinical events exacerbate health care resource use and costs among patients with MDD. Effective therapeutic regimens initiated optimally in the course of treatment may mitigate costly clinical events associated with MDD. DISCLOSURES: This study was sponsored by Allergan plc (prior to its acquisition by AbbVie). The sponsor was involved in the study design, data collection, data analysis, manuscript preparation, and publication decisions. All authors met the ICMJE authorship criteria. Neither honoraria nor payments were made for authorship. Dr Cutler is a consultant for AbbVie, Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Akili Interactive, Alfasigma, Alkermes, Allergan (now AbbVie), Avanir, BioXcel Therapeutics, BlackThorn Therapeutics, Intra-Cellular Therapies, Ironshore, Janssen, Karuna Therapeutics, Lundbeck, Neurocrine Biosciences, Noven, Otsuka, Sage Therapeutics, Sunovion, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, Teva and Tris Pharma; has received speaker/promotional honoraria from AbbVie, Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Alfasigma, Alkermes, Allergan, Avanir, Intra-Cellular Therapies, Ironshore, Janssen, Lundbeck, Neurocrine Biosciences, Noven, Otsuka, Sunovion, Takeda, Teva, and Tris Pharma; and has received research grants from Aevi Genomics, Akili Interactive, Alkermes, Allergan (now AbbVie), Arbor Pharmaceuticals, Biohaven, Ironshore, KemPharm, Lilly, Lundbeck, Neos Therapeutics, Novartis, Otsuka, Purdue Canada, Sunovion, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Takeda and Tris Pharma. Drs Keyloun and Gillard are AbbVie employees and may hold stock. Dr Higa was an employee of AbbVie at the time of the study and may hold stock. Ms Park is an employee of Merative, formerly IBM Watson Health, which received funding from Allergan (prior to its acquisition by AbbVie) to conduct this analysis. Dr Bonafede was an employee of IBM Watson Health, now Merative, which received funding from Allergan (prior to its acquisition by AbbVie) to conduct this analysis. Dr Jain has served as a consultant to Addrenex, Allergan (now AbbVie), Avanir, Janssen, Lilly, Lundbeck, Merck, Neos Therapeutics, Neurocrine Biosciences, Otsuka, Pamlab, Pfizer, Shionogi, Shire, Sunovion, Supernus, Takeda, and Teva; has been a paid speaker for Addrenex, Alkermes, Allergan (now AbbVie), Lilly, Lundbeck, Merck, Neos Therapeutics, Otsuka, Pamlab, Pfizer, Rhodes, Shionogi, Shire, Sunovion, Takeda, and Tris Pharmaceuticals; has received research support from Allergan (now AbbVie), AstraZeneca, Lilly, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Pfizer, Shire, and Takeda; and has served on the advisory boards for Addrenex, Alkermes, Avanir, Forum, Janssen, Lilly, Lundbeck, Merck, Neos Therapeutics, Neurocrine Biosciences, Otsuka, Pamlab, Pfizer, Shionogi, Shire, Sunovion, Supernus, Takeda, and Teva.

Clinical and economic burden of neovascular age-related macular degeneration by disease status: a US claims-based analysis.

BACKGROUND: New treatment alternatives have revolutionized the management of nAMD. However, there is limited evidence on the clinical and economic burden of nAMD in commercially insured US patients. OBJECTIVES: To examine the clinical and economic burden in patients with nAMD by disease status in the commercially insured US patient population and to identify drivers of nAMD-related costs. METHODS: Patients with at least 1 International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) diagnosis for nAMD were identified from the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus database between April 2016 and August 2017 (index period). Patients had continuous enrollment for at least 6 months before and at least 12 months after the index date. Eye-level disease status was reported, along with intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment patterns. Health care resource utilization (HRU) (all-cause and nAMD-related) and direct health care costs were estimated over the 12 month follow-up period. Outcomes associated with falls and fractures were also assessed. Multivariate analysis identified drivers of annual nAMD-related outpatient costs among patients with anti-VEGF therapy. Incident patients (defined as those without an nAMD diagnosis 6 months prior to the index date) with at least 18 months of continuous enrollment after the index date were identified for a subset analysis to evaluate documented changes in disease status. RESULTS: A total of 6,076 patients with nAMD were identified for the prevalent cohort; 60.1%, 17.2%, and 5.9% had active CNV, inactive CNV, and inactive scar disease stage at index, respectively. The nAMD-related outpatient visit costs were roughly 4 and roughly 7 times higher, respectively, for the active CNV group ($8,658 [SD = $11,612]) compared with the inactive CNV ($2,406 [SD = $5,510]) and inactive scar ($1,198 [SD = $3,035]) groups (P < 0.0001). About 10% of prevalent patients had a fall/fracture claim over 12 months of follow-up. A total of 3,623 prevalent patients (59.6%) were eligible for the anti-VEGF treatment patterns analysis (mean [SD] duration of therapy = 7.7 [4.5] months; mean [SD] number of injections = 6.0 [3.7]). Qualified incident cases comprised 17.8% (n = 1,081) of the prevalent cohort. Approximately 20% of incident eyes with active CNV at baseline transitioned to inactive CNV. A total of 427 incident patients (39.5%) qualified for anti-VEGF treatment patterns analysis (mean [SD] duration of therapy = 6.2 [4.7] months, mean [SD] number of injections = 5.2 [3.5]). Significant drivers of total nAMD-related costs were the initial anti-VEGF agent and anti-VEGF injection frequency (P < 0.0001) in both prevalent and incident cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical and economic burden of nAMD treatment is substantial to the US healthcare system, where economic burden is higher among those with active CNV. Appropriate treatment may increase the duration of inactive disease periods and preserve visual acuity while lowering costs. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Allergan, an AbbVie Company. Allergan employees were involved in the study design, interpretation of data, writing of the manuscript, and the decision to submit for publication. Keyloun and Campbell are employees of Allergan. Multani, McGuiness, and Chen are employees of IQVIA, which received funding from Allergan for conducting the analysis. Almony and Shah-Manek have nothing to disclose.

Modeling operational quality metrics and costs of long-acting antibiotics for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection treatment in the emergency department.

Aims: To model implementation of a new treatment pathway leveraging long-acting antibiotics (LAs) for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) in a hospital emergency department (ED) with an observation unit, and to quantify health resource utilization and economic outcomes versus standard care (intravenous vancomycin). Materials and methods: Discrete-event simulation was used to model implementation of the LA treatment pathway in the ED versus standard care from the US Medicare perspective. Model inputs were derived from published sources to simulate a real-world hospital ED with an observation unit. Outcomes included key ED metrics such as patient throughput rate and length of stay (LOS) and cost (estimated through reimbursed amounts in 2017 USD). Results: Implementation of an LA pathway in the ED improved ABSSSI patient throughput rate by 350% (+5.8 dispositions/ED and observation unit day) and reduced LOS by 68% (-7.2 h/patient). These improvements in patient outcomes are driven by the reduced infusion time required for LA antibiotics and are greater for dalbavancin than oritavancin owing to the shorter infusion duration (30 min vs. 3 h). Limitations: External validity of the model was not assessed. The model was limited to care received in EDs; therefore, certain clinical variables outside the ED were not captured for this analysis. Conclusions: LA pathway implementation for ABSSSI treatment in the ED supported improved efficiency, which may translate to economic value. As EDs continue to focus on improving key metrics such as throughput rate and LOS, LA pathway implementation should be considered as a potential approach for abbreviated ABSSSI treatment in the ED.

Economic burden of hospital admissions for patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections in the United States.

Objectives: We estimated the total US hospital costs associated with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) admissions as well as the admissions that may have been potential candidates for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). Methods: We assessed inpatient admissions for ABSSSI from the Premier database (2011-2014), focusing on all admissions of adults with length of stay (LOS) ≥ 1 days and a primary diagnosis of erysipelas, cellulitis/abscess, or wound infection. We performed a detailed analysis of 2014 admissions for patient, treatment, hospital, and economic characteristic variables. Using published selection criteria, we identified a subset of patients admitted in 2014 who may have been potential candidates for OPAT. Results: We analyzed 277,971 admissions. In 2014, most admissions were for cellulitis without major complications or comorbidities; mean ± SD LOS was 4.0 ± 3.0 days, and total hospital cost per admission was $6400 ± $6874, 54% of which was attributable to room costs. Among 2014 admissions, 14% involved patients with clinical characteristics suggesting that they were consistent with guideline recommendations for exclusive treatment with OPAT. Compared with all admissions in the year, these admissions were of younger patients (aged 50 vs. 55 years), admitted more frequently for cellulitis (90% vs. 70%), with shorter LOS (2.8 ± 1.8 days), and lower mean total hospital cost per admission ($4080 ± $3066). Conclusions: Admissions for ABSSSI impose a substantial cost to US hospitals, with half of costs attributable to room costs. When extrapolated to all US patients admitted to the hospital for ABSSSI during 2014, had OPAT guidelines been universally followed, admissions may have been reduced by 14%, thereby saving US hospitals $161 million.

Adherence and Persistence Across Antidepressant Therapeutic Classes: A Retrospective Claims Analysis Among Insured US Patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD).

BACKGROUND: Adherence and persistence to therapy, or how well a patient follows provider directions on frequency and time to discontinuation of prescribed medications, is associated with positive health outcomes, including decreased healthcare costs and patient mortality. A clear literature gap exists assessing adherence and persistence to antidepressants (ADs) in the major depressive disorder (MDD) population at clinically relevant time points and at the therapeutic class level. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed adherence and persistence to specific ADs, therapeutic classes, and AD therapy overall at multiple time points among US individuals from commercial, Medicare supplemental, and Medicaid insurance plans. METHODS: Patients with MDD without AD or MDD claims in the prior 6 months who initiated therapy in 2003-2014 with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), tricyclic AD (TCA), monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI), or other AD were identified using MarketScan® databases. These databases contain information on diagnoses, billing codes, and dates of service. Adherence (proportion of days covered) and persistence (days until a 30-day gap in therapy) were calculated to AD medication, AD therapeutic class, and AD therapy overall over the first 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from the index prescription date. Multivariable logistic regression estimated the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of adherence to initial AD medication comparing AD therapeutic classes. RESULTS: For 527,907 patients, adherence to initial AD medication decreased over 3, 6, 9, and 12 months (41, 31, 24, and 21%, respectively). Similar patterns were observed for adherence to initial AD therapeutic class, AD therapy overall, and all three persistence calculations. The odds of adherence to SNRIs versus SSRIs were 20-27% greater at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months (ORs 1.20, 1.23, 1.25, 1.27, respectively; p-values all <0.0001). Similar or significantly lower odds of adherence were demonstrated for other classes versus SSRIs at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months [ORs for other ADs 0.80, 0.77, 0.74, 0.72, respectively (p-values all <0.0001); ORs for TCAs 0.46, 0.45, 0.47, 0.49, respectively (p-values all <0.0001); ORs for MAOIs 1.13, 1.0, 0.77, 0.69, respectively (p-values all >0.05)]. CONCLUSION: We found low adherence and persistence to ADs in the MDD population. Within the limitations of the insurance claims data we analysed, our results suggest that adherence may differ based on therapeutic class, as patients initiating SNRI therapy appeared to have a higher likelihood of adherence versus SSRIs over the year assessed, while the odds of adherence appeared similar or lower for other classes versus SSRIs. Further prospective research is needed to confirm these findings and determine additional drivers of these apparent differences by AD therapeutic class.