Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
BJU Int ; 118(2): 327-34, 2016 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26917016

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To conduct an audit of patients presenting with long-term urinary catheter (LTC)-associated problems to our Emergency Department (ED) and to assess the availability of community nursing support for their LTC. We also estimated the cost implication to the health service and the potential solutions to this issue, as although catheter care is provided by community nurses, LTC problems are common presentations to the ED and are often significant burdens to the services. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A study was carried out of all patients presenting to the ED with a urinary catheter problem, specifically studying LTCs and the reason for presentation, district nurses' involvement, and the intervention received. RESULTS: In all, 78 patients with a urinary catheter problem presented to the ED over a 69-day period, of whom 59 (68%) had a LTC. In all, 33 patients (42%) attended during normal working hours between 0900 and 1700 h. The mean (range) age was 74 (42-93) years and the duration the LTC had been in situ was 11 (1-120) months. The most common reasons for attendance were blocked catheter (37 patients, 47%) and catheter-bypass (18, 23%). Only 28 patients (36%) were known to district nursing services, and 14% were referred by a district nurse. Most of the remaining patients self-referred to the ED. No patient had any documented contact with their general practitioner. In addition, 64 patients (82%) had their catheter issues addressed adequately by ED nurses or doctors, without any urology involvement. CONCLUSIONS: The high morbidity of LTCs causes a considerable demand on ED services, and has heavy cost implications to the health system. Most patients had minimal community nurse support, and their catheter problems were easily dealt with by ED nurses and doctors.


Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/provisão & distribuição , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Cateterismo Urinário/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos
2.
BJU Int ; 100(6): 1298-301, 2007 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17979927

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the idea of managing patients having problems with long-term catheterization (LTC, normally used when all other methods of bladder management have failed or are unsuitable) in a dedicated clinic, to present a prospective analysis of consecutive new patients attending between February 2002 and October 2006, and to establish the incidence of bladder stones in patients who have recurrent catheter encrustation and blockage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients treated with LTC are a large heterogeneous group, mainly consisting of elderly people who have chronic disabilities, and catheter-associated complications occur in > 70% of them. In all, 260 consecutive new patients having problems with LTC were assessed; the evaluation consisted of basic demographics, a detailed history, clinical examination, urine analysis and flexible cystoscopy (FC) via the catheterization route. Patients with bladder stones were screened with FC for recurrence of stones at 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment. RESULTS: In all, 117 men and 143 women (mean age 67.7 years, range 23-97) were assessed; 147 (55.5%) had catheter encrustation. FC showed that 66 of the 147 patients (45%) had bladder stones. Forty-eight patients (73%) were successfully treated at the same clinic appointment and their stones were removed with the help of a tip-less stone basket. Eighteen patients (27%) were referred for inpatient treatment of bladder stones under general anaesthesia. Twenty of 66 patients with bladder stones (30%) formed recurrent bladder stones at a mean (range) follow-up of 8.1 (3-18 months). In addition, 36 patients had successful insertion of suprapubic catheter (SPC) under local anaesthetic in the clinic, and 11 were referred for SPC insertion under general anaesthesia. Two patients were diagnosed with bladder transitional cell carcinoma. CONCLUSION: The introduction of a dedicated catheter clinic, equipped with facilities such as FC and a hoist, enables patients to be treated in an environment that meets their needs and potentially reduces the risk of more complex stone removal and catheter problems at a later date. It can also act as a potential source of data for use in research and development. A significant proportion (45%) of patients with catheter encrustation and blockage had formed bladder stones. Our study provides a rationale for FC of all such patients to detect and remove stones.


Assuntos
Cateteres de Demora/efeitos adversos , Contaminação de Equipamentos/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Proteus/prevenção & controle , Cálculos da Bexiga Urinária/prevenção & controle , Cateterismo Urinário/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cateteres de Demora/microbiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Proteus mirabilis , Recidiva , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA