Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy: Predictors of major adverse cardiac events and assessment of reversibility after liver transplant.

BACKGROUND: Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM), initially described in 2005 and revised in 2019, is a source of MACE in patients after OLT. We sought to identify CCM-related predictors of MACE at one-year follow-up after OLT and assess for reversibility of CCM post-OLT. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of adult patients who underwent OLT between 2009 and 2019. All patients had transthoracic echocardiography pre-and post-OLT. Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction <50 % pre-OLT were excluded. MACE was defined as death, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure hospitalization, or cardiac arrest. RESULTS: In total, 131 patients were included in this study, of whom 103 and 23 patients met the 2005 and 2019 criteria, respectively. During the follow-up period, 42 patients had MACE and these patients were more likely to have ascites (p = 0.003), hepatorenal syndrome (p = 0.019), and CCM per 2005 criteria (p = 0.023). There were no significant differences between pre-OLT CCM per 2019 criteria (19 % vs 17 %, p = 0.758) or MELD-Na score (21.24 vs 19.40, p = 0.166) for MACE post-OLT. Per the 2005 criteria, 35 of 103 patients recovered and these patients were less likely to have MACE post-OLT (p = 0.012). Per the 2019 criteria, 13 of 23 patients recovered post-OLT but this low number precluded further statistics. CONCLUSION: The 2005 Montreal criteria for CCM were an independent predictor of MACE at one-year follow-up post-OLT while the 2019 CCC criteria for CCM were not. In addition, the 2005 Montreal criteria were more prevalent when compared to 2019 CCC criteria. Finally, the 2005 Montreal criteria were reversible post-OLT 34 % of the time compared to the 2019 CCC criteria which were reversible 57 % of the time.

Dobutamine echocardiography for assessment of viability in the current era.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Studies from the 1990s and early 2000s documented the utility of dobutamine echocardiography for the prediction of functional recovery and prognosis with revascularization. The results of The Surgical Treatment of Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial called into question the value of viability assessment using dobutamine echocardiography. The purpose of this review is to re-examine the literature on dobutamine echocardiography, put into context the STICH results, and provide insight into the current role of dobutamine echocardiography viability testing. RECENT FINDINGS: In contrast to the results of previous nonrandomized trials, the STICH trial showed that patients with viability defined by nuclear perfusion imaging or dobutamine echocardiography did not have improved survival with CABG compared with optimal medical therapy. Viability by dobutamine echocardiography was defined as the presence of contractile reserve in at least five segments with baseline dysfunction. The results of dobutamine echocardiography studies published before and after initiation of the STICH trial suggest that the definition of viability utilized in that trial may be suboptimal for assessment of improvement in global function and prognosis in patients undergoing revascularization. Assessment of global contractile reserve using wall motion score (WMS) or ejection fraction may be superior to utilization of a binary definition of viability confined to assessment of contractile reserve in a fixed number of segments because these indices provide information on both the magnitude and extent of contractile reserve of the entire left ventricle (LV). SUMMARY: Assessment of WMS or ejection fraction with dobutamine echocardiography may be the optimal means of evaluating the impact of viability on prognosis.Video abstract http://links.lww.com/HCO/A56.