Patients with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer: A Markov decision analysis of esophagectomy versus active surveillance.

OBJECTIVE: Chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy is a standard treatment option for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC). Esophagectomy is a high-risk procedure, and recent evidence suggests select patients may benefit from omitting or delaying surgery. This study aims to compare surgery versus active surveillance for LAEC patients with complete clinical response (cCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). METHODS: Decision analysis with Markov modeling was used. The base case was a 60-year-old man with T3N0M0 esophageal cancer with cCR after nCRT. The decision was modeled for a 5-year time horizon. Primary outcomes were life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). Probabilities and utilities were derived through the literature. Deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed using ranges from the literature with consideration for clinical plausibility. RESULTS: Surgery was favored for survival with an expected life-years of 2.89 versus 2.64. After incorporating quality of life, active surveillance was favored, with an expected QALY of 1.70 versus 1.56. The model was sensitive to probability of recurrence on active surveillance (threshold value 0.598), probability of recurrence being resectable (0.318), and disutility of previous esophagectomy (-0.091). The model was not sensitive to perioperative morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Our study finds that surgery increases life expectancy but decreases QALY. Although the incremental change in QALY for either modality is insufficient to make broad clinical recommendations, our study demonstrates that either approach is acceptable. As probabilities of key factors are further defined in the literature, treatment decisions for patients with LAEC and a cCR after nCRT should consider histology, patient values, and quality of life.

Risk assessment for postoperative venous thromboembolism using the modified Caprini risk assessment model in lung cancer.

Background: Postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-documented cause of morbidity and mortality in lung cancer patients. However, risk identification remains limited. In this study, we sought to analyze the risk factors for VTE and verify the predictive value of the modified Caprini risk assessment model (RAM). Methods: This prospective single-center study included patients with resectable lung cancer who underwent resection between October 2019 and March 2021. The incidence of VTE was estimated. Logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors for VTE. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to test the ability of the modified Caprini RAM to predict VTE. Results: The VTE incidence was 10.5%. Several variables, including age, D-dimer, hemoglobin (Hb), bleeding, and patient confinement to bed were significantly associated with VTE after surgery. The difference between the VTE and non-VTE groups in the high-risk levels was statistically significant (P<0.001), while the low and moderate risk levels showed no significant difference. The combined use of the modified Caprini score and the Hb and D-dimer levels showed an area under the curve (AUC) was 0.822 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.760-0.855. P<0.001]. Conclusions: The risk-stratification approach of the modified Caprini RAM is not particularly valid after lung resection in our population. The use of the modified Caprini RAM combined with Hb and D-dimer levels shows a good diagnostic performance for VTE prediction in patients with lung cancer undergoing resection.

Symptom Assessment Following Surgery for Lung Cancer: A Canadian Population-based Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a population-level analysis of temporal trends and risk factors for high symptom burden in patients receiving surgery for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). BACKGROUND: A population-level overview of symptoms after curative intent surgery is necessary to inform decision making and supportive care for patients with lung cancer. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients receiving surgery for stages I to III NSCLC between January 2007 and September 2018. Prospectively collection Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) scores, linked to provincial administrative data, were used to describe the prevalence, trajectory, and predictors of moderate-to-severe symptoms in the year following surgery. RESULTS: A total of 5350 patients, with 28,490 unique ESAS assessments, were included in the analysis. Moderate-to-severe tiredness (68%), poor wellbeing (63%), and shortness of breath (60%) were the most common symptoms reported. The rise and fall in the proportion of patients experiencing moderate-to-severe symptoms after surgery coincided with the median time to first (58 days, interquartile range: 47-72) and last cycle of chemotherapy (140 days, interquartile range: 118-168), respectively. There was eventual stabilization, albeit above the preoperative baseline, within 6 to 7 months after surgery. Female sex (relative risk [RR] 1.09- 1.26), lower income (RR 1.08-1.23), stage III disease (RR 1.15-1.43), adjuvant therapy (RR 1.09-1.42), chemotherapy within 2 weeks of an ESAS assessment (RR 1.14-1.73), and pneumonectomy (RR 1.05-1.15) were associated with moderate-to-severe symptoms following surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of population-level prevalence, trajectory, and predictors of moderate-to-severe symptoms after surgery for NSCLC can be used to facilitate shared decision making and improve symptom management throughout the course of illness.

Impact of cost-awareness education and surgeon-led positive deviance on intraoperative costs of thoracoscopic lobectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Disposable instrument use during video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy is a significant driver of cost. The purpose of the study was to measure the effect of increasing surgeon cost awareness via successive "value improvement initiatives" on instrument costs. METHODS: We prospectively collected disposable instrument use data for all video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomies performed by 5 Board-certified thoracic surgeons over 4 successive time periods: Period 1: control group of consecutive video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomies before interventions; Period 2: video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomies after displaying disposables price list in operating room; Period 3: video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomies after educational presentation outlining disposable instrument price differences; Period 4: video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomies after surgeon self-assessment with peer comparison of cost data from Period 3 and positive deviance seminar identifying the lowest-cost surgeon to lead discussion of optimal cost-reduction strategies. Instrument use and costs were compared among the 4 groups using the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: A total of 373 lobectomy cases were analyzed. Compared with Period 1, median stapler-related and total disposable costs for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy cases decreased after successive value improvement initiatives, with lowest costs in Period 4 (P < .0001). Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated per lobectomy disposables cost reduction of $397.53 in Period 4, after controlling for surgeon and lobe (P < .0001). Operating room time was reduced after successive value improvement initiatives (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Cost awareness and surgeon engagement activities were associated with sustained cost reduction for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomies. Surgeon self-assessment, peer comparison, and positive deviance seminar were associated with the largest cost reduction. Significant hospital cost-savings may be realized with surgeon-led value improvement initiatives.

A simple "passive awareness" intervention to decrease the cost of thoracoscopic lobectomy.

In thoracic surgery, disposable instruments are significant drivers of cost. There is variation in disposable instrument use among surgeons. It was hypothesized that a "passive awareness" intervention (displaying a pricing list of disposable instruments in the operating theater) would decrease operative costs. A current price list of disposable instruments used in thoracoscopic lobectomy was displayed in the thoracic surgery operating theater. Consecutive patients who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy 6 months prior to price list display (Period 1) and 6 months following price list display (Period 2) were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used to describe case distribution and lobectomy costs. T test and linear regression were used to examine the impact of surgeon, lobe removed, and time period. Over the study period, 71 patients underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy (Period 1: n = 36, Period 2: n = 35). Median per-lobectomy disposables cost decreased from $2063.22 (Interquartile range [IQR] $788.49) in Period 1 to $1885.92 (IQR $552.26) in Period 2; p = 0.03. There was a significant reduction in the median number of "high cost disposables" between Periods 1 and 2 (5.5-5.0, respectively; p = 0.04). In multiple linear regression, there was a decrease in total per-lobectomy cost of $286.21 (p = 0.03) and a decrease in stapler cartridge cost of $266.89 (p = 0.03) when controlling for surgeon and lobe. There was a significant reduction in disposable instrument expenditure per thoracoscopic lobectomy following posting of instrument costs in the operating theater. These findings suggest that a simple passive awareness intervention is effective in influencing surgeon behavior to reduce disposable instrument costs.

COVID-19 guidance for triage of operations for thoracic malignancies: A consensus statement from Thoracic Surgery Outcomes Research Network.

The extraordinary demands of managing the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the world's ability to care for patients with thoracic malignancies. As a hospital's COVID-19 population increases and hospital resources are depleted, the ability to provide surgical care is progressively restricted, forcing surgeons to prioritize among their cancer populations. Representatives from multiple cancer, surgical, and research organizations have come together to provide a guide for triaging patients with thoracic malignancies as the impact of COVID-19 evolves as each hospital.

Patient-Reported Symptoms for Esophageal Cancer Patients Undergoing Curative Intent Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer (EC) patients experience considerable symptom burden from treatment. This study utilized population-level patient-reported Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) scores collected as part of standard clinical care to describe symptom trajectories and characteristics associated with severe symptoms for patients undergoing curative intent EC treatment. METHODS: EC patients treated with curative intent at regional cancer centers and affiliates between 2009 and 2016 and assessed for symptoms in the 12 months after diagnosis were included. The ESAS measures 9 common patient-reported cancer symptoms. The outcome was report of a severe symptom score (score ≥7 our of 10). Multivariable analyses were used to identify characteristics associated with severe symptom scores. RESULTS: A total of 1751 patients reported a median of 7 (interquartile range, 4-12) ESAS assessments in the year after diagnosis, for a total of 14,953 unique ESAS assessments included in the analysis. The most frequently reported severe symptoms were lack of appetite (n = 918, 52%), tiredness (n = 787, 45%), and poor well-being (n = 713, 41%). The highest symptom burden was within the first 5 months after diagnosis, with moderate improvement in symptom burden in the second half of the first year. Characteristics associated with severe scores for all symptoms included female sex, high comorbidity, lower socioeconomic status, urban residence, and symptom assessment temporally close to diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a high symptom burden for EC patients undergoing curative intent therapy. Targeted treatment of common severe symptoms and increased support for patients at risk for severe symptoms may enhance patient quality of life.

Frailty assessment prior to thoracic surgery for lung or esophageal cancer: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Frailty assessment has not been thoroughly assessed in thoracic surgery. Our primary objective was to assess the feasibility of comprehensive frailty testing prior to lung and esophageal surgery for cancer. The secondary objective was to assess the utility of frailty indices in risk assessment prior to thoracic surgery. METHODS: Prospectively recruited patients completed multiple physiotherapy tests (6-min walk, gait speed, hand-grip strength), risk stratification (Charlson Comorbidity Index, Revised Cardiac Risk Index, Modified Frailty Index), and quality of life questionnaires. Lean psoas area was also assessed by a radiologist using positron emission tomography/computed tomography scans. Data was analyzed using Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney U and independent t tests. RESULTS: The feasibility of comprehensive frailty assessment was assessed over a 4-month period among 40 patients (esophagus n = 20; lung n = 20). Risk stratification questionnaires administered in clinic had 100% completion rates. Physiotherapy testing required a trained physiotherapist and an additional visit to the pre-admission clinic; these tests proved difficult to coordinate and had lower completion rates (63-75%). Although most measures were not significantly associated with occurrence of complications, the Modified Frailty Index approached statistical significance (p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty assessment is feasible in the pre-operative outpatient setting and had a high degree of acceptance among surgeons and patients. Of the risk stratification questionnaires, the Modified Frailty Index may be useful in predicting outcomes as per this feasibility study. Pre-operative frailty assessment can identify vulnerable oncology patients to aid in treatment planning with the goal of optimizing clinical outcomes and resource allocation.

Quality of life assessment in esophagectomy patients.

Esophagectomy is the mainstay of curative therapy for esophageal cancer; however, it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, with subsequent major impact on quality of life. This paper reviews the evaluation of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in esophageal cancer patients undergoing curative intent therapy, the relationship between postoperative HRQOL and survival as well the potential utility of pre-treatment HRQOL as a prognostic tool. HRQOL assessment is valuable in helping clinicians understand the impact on patients of esophageal cancer and the various treatments thereof. HRQOL is also valuable as an end-point in studies of esophageal cancer and esophageal cancer treatment. Given the morbidity and mortality associated with the various treatments for esophageal cancer, it could be argued that HRQOL is as important an endpoint as survival, if not more so. Patient-reported pre-treatment HRQOL assessment appears to predict survival better than clinician-derived performance status assessment period. HRQOL assessment also appears to be responsive to surgical and non-surgical therapy and thus could potentially be used in trials and in practice to serve that function. Thus, HRQOL assessment could be a potentially important adjunct in shared decision-making and guiding treatment planning as well as monitoring the progress of treatment.

Is tissue still the issue? Lobectomy for suspicious lung nodules without confirmation of malignancy.

BACKGROUND: Histologic confirmation of malignancy has been indicated for a suspicious lung nodule prior to resection. The purpose of this study was to determine whether or not foregoing routine tissue biopsy increased the incidence of lobectomy for benign lesions. METHODS: Retrospective cohort of 256 patients who underwent thoracoscopic or open lobectomy for a confirmed or suspected pulmonary malignancy, with or without tissue diagnosis. Clinical, radiographic, and pathologic data were compared. RESULTS: Among 256 patients, 127 had attempted biopsy (group A) and 129 had no biopsy procedure (group B). There was no significant difference in the incidence of benign resections between the groups (Group A = 4 (3.2%) benign pathology vs group B = 9 (7.0%; P = 0.16). Group B had significantly lower operative time (127.1 vs 112.3 minutes; P = 0.004) and intraoperative complications (23 vs 37 patients; P = 0.03). There was a trend toward longer hospital stay and surgical waiting time in group A (6.6 vs 5.2 days, P = 0.24; 92.4 vs 66.2 days; P = 0.14, respectively). CONCLUSION: Foregoing biopsies and proceeding to lobectomy in selected patients with suspicious lung nodules is safe, did not increase the incidence of resected benign pathology, and may decrease surgical wait time. Patients should be carefully evaluated and counseled.

Baseline measure of health-related quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Esophagus) is associated with overall survival in patients with esophageal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Esophagus is a health-related quality of life instrument validated in patients with esophageal cancer. It is composed of a general component and an esophageal cancer subscale. Our objective was to determine whether the baseline Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Esophagus and esophageal cancer subscale scores are associated with survival in patients with stage II and III cancer of the gastroesophageal junction or thoracic esophagus. METHODS: Data from 4 prospective studies in Canadian academic hospitals were combined. These included consecutive patients with stage II and III esophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery or chemoradiation/radiation alone. All patients completed baseline Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Esophagus. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Esophagus and esophageal cancer subscale scores were dichotomized on the basis of median scores. Cox regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: There were 207 patients treated between 1996 and 2014. Mean age was 61 ± 10.6 years. Approximately 69.6% of patients (n = 144) had adenocarcinoma. All patients had more than 9 months of follow-up. In patients with stage II and III, 93 deaths were observed. When treated as continuous variables, baseline Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Esophagus and esophageal cancer subscale were associated with survival with hazard ratios of 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-0.96; P = .005) and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.56-0.82; P < .001), respectively. When dichotomized, they were also associated with survival with a hazard ratio of 0.58 (95% CI, 0.38-0.89; P = .01) and 0.43 (95% CI, 0.28-0.67; P < .001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stage II and III esophageal cancer being considered for therapy, higher baseline Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Esophagus and esophageal cancer subscale were independently associated with longer survival, even after adjusting for age, stage, histology, and therapy received. Further study is needed, but Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Esophagus may be useful as a prognostic tool to inform patient decision-making and patient selection criteria for studies.

The effect of loss to follow-up on treatment of blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury.

OBJECTIVE: Loss to follow-up (LTFU) can be a major difficulty for any clinical research study. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the extent of LTFU and its potential effect in studies of adult trauma patients with blunt thoracic aortic injuries (BTAIs). METHODS: Studies comparing management of BTAIs were systematically reviewed. Duplicate independent review was used for study selection, data abstraction, and critical appraisals. RESULTS: Thirty-six studies were included for synthesis, of which 94.1% applied a retrospective cohort design to prospective institutional databases. The mean LTFU at 1 year was 26.5% ± 31.6% for endovascular repair and 20.6% ± 34.2% for open repair groups. Not having a surgical/interventional specialist as a first or senior author was associated with a 39.7% higher LTFU at 1 year (P = .002). Studies with a higher risk of bias, later publication year, or North American origin were associated with a significantly higher risk for LTFU at 1 year (P ≤ .001). Nearly half of included studies assessed in-hospital outcomes exclusively. Only 38.2% explicitly reported LTFU data. Eight studies explicitly described the method of dealing with LTFU: eight used survival analysis and one used a national Social Security Death Index. Sensitivity analyses using plausible worst-case LTFU scenarios resulted in 14% to 17% of studies changing direction of effect. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant LTFU in trauma studies comparing operative methods for BTAIs. LTFU is generally handled and reported suboptimally, and sensitivity analyses suggest that study results are sensitive to differential LTFU. This has implications for the evidence-based choice of the operative method. Some protective factors that may aid in reducing LTFU were identified, one of which was involvement of a surgical or interventional specialist as a key author.