Thin Ideal Internalization Assessment (THIINA): Development and Psychometric Validation of a New Measure of Female Body Image.

Thin ideal internalization is widely implicated in women's body image and eating disturbances. A recently proposed multidimensional operationalization of internalization suggests the brevity and construct validity of existing questionnaires may limit the assessment of thin ideal internalization. Therefore, this research aimed to develop a new questionnaire (i.e., Thin Ideal Internalization Assessment; THIINA) to comprehensively assess thin ideal internalization. In Study 1, 301 female participants were administered the THIINA. Exploratory factor analyses revealed the 17-item THIINA had a stable 3-factor structure reflecting thin idealization, thin overvaluation, and thin behavioral drive. In Study 2, 337 female participants were administered the THIINA and validation measures. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed stability of the 3-factor structure and findings supported convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity of the THIINA. Support for temporal stability was found within a sub-sample of participants (n = 132). The THIINA demonstrated strong psychometric properties, a stable three-factor structure representing theoretically-driven domains, and support for the creation of a composite score representing overall thin ideal internalization. These findings suggest the multidimensional operationalization and measurement of thin ideal internalization could improve theoretical and clinical understanding of the impact of thin ideal internalization on women's body image and eating.

Improving assessment and progress monitoring in alcohol use disorder: An implementation evaluation of the instant assessment and personalised feedback system (iAx).

BACKGROUND: When treating patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD), best practice guidelines recommend the use of standardised assessment instruments to obtain reliable information about psychological symptoms and functioning to inform treatment. Due to time constraints and administrative burden, many mental health practitioners do not routinely use standardised assessments. To overcome these barriers, an instant assessment and feedback system (iAx) was developed that electronically administers standardised instruments. Responses are instantly scored and benchmarked against clinical norms for immediate interpretation. This allows for timely assessment and feedback. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of the iAx system at a specialist alcohol and drug outpatient unit in a public hospital. METHODS: Baseline (pre-iAx implementation; paper-and-pencil assessments) and follow-up (post-iAx implementation) clinical audits collated records from 313 patients with AUD across 2,616 treatment sessions. Multilevel modelling was used to determine if use of standardised instruments increased post-iAx implementation. RESULTS: Post-iAx implementation, there was a significant increase in the probability of using standardised assessments during the initial assessment and throughout treatment (ps < 0.001). Specifically, the use of standardised assessments to inform initial assessment of patients increased from 51% to 89%, and progress monitoring of symptoms increased from 28% to 84%. A significant increase in treatment completion rates was also observed post-iAx implementation (from 15.6% to 32.4%). Psychologists and patients also provided feedback on iAx acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility. CONCLUSIONS: This study found support for the successful implementation of an electronic, theory-driven iAx system to improve assessment practices with patients with AUD in routine clinical settings.

Drug and alcohol practitioners' attitudes toward the use of standardized assessment.

Despite their importance to evidence-based assessment, standardized assessments remain underutilized by mental health practitioners in practice. The underutilization has been attributed to a lack of appreciation of the importance of standardized assessments, lack of knowledge of standardized assessments, and practical barriers to implementation. This study sought to gather the first descriptive data on alcohol and other drug (AOD) practitioners' attitudes toward, and knowledge and self-reported use of, standardized assessments. Practical barriers to implementation in initial assessment and progress monitoring were also assessed. Ninety-nine Australian AOD practitioners recruited via newsletters of national representative bodies and practitioner networks completed an online survey. While practitioners' attitudes towards using standardized assessments for initial assessment and progress monitoring were generally positive and consistent with other populations of health practitioners, assessments remained underutilized in practice. Most AOD practitioners did not consider standardized assessments to be feasible to implement. The current findings highlight the importance of practical barriers, particularly organization-level barriers, in the underutilization of standardized assessments in AOD practice. Findings support an extension of dialogue surrounding evidence-based practice beyond treatment selection to include assessment practices at a more general level. The present study offers a starting point from which efforts to improve practitioner compliance with evidence-based best practices can be conceived, designed, and implemented.