Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Peripartum Pain Assessment and Management.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to determine if there were racial/ethnic disparities in pain assessment and management from labor throughout the postpartum period. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all births from January 2019 to December 2021 in a single urban, quaternary care hospital, excluding patients with hysterectomy, ICU stay, transfusion of more than 3 units of packed red blood cells, general anesthesia, or evidence of a substance abuse disorder. We characterized and compared patterns of antepartum and postpartum pain assessments, epidural use, pain scores, and postpartum pain management by racial/ethnic group with bivariable analyses. Multivariable regression was performed to test for an association between race/ethnicity and amount of opioid pain medication in milligram equivalent units, stratified by delivery mode. RESULTS: There were 18,085 births between 2019 and 2021 with available race/ethnicity data. Of these, 58.3% were white, 15.0% were Hispanic, 11.9% were Asian, 7.4% were Black, and the remaining 7.4% were classified as Other/Declined. There were no significant differences by race/ethnicity in the number of antepartum or postpartum pain assessments or the proportion of patients who received epidural analgesia. Black and Hispanic patients reported the highest maximum postpartum pain scores after vaginal and cesarean birth compared to white and Asian patients. However, Black and Hispanic patients received lower daily doses of opioid medications than white patients, regardless of delivery mode. After adjusting for patient factors and non-opioid medication dosages, all other racial/ethnic groups received less opioid medication than white patients. CONCLUSION: Inequities were found in postpartum pain treatment, including among patients reporting the highest pain levels.

Obstetric Care Consensus #9: Levels of Maternal Care: (Replaces Obstetric Care Consensus Number 2, February 2015).

Maternal mortality and severe maternal morbidity, particularly among women of color, have increased in the United States. The leading medical causes of maternal mortality include cardiovascular disease, infection, and common obstetric complications such as hemorrhage and vary by timing relative to the end of pregnancy. Although specific modifications in the clinical management of some of these conditions have been instituted, more can be done to improve the system of care for high-risk women at facility and population levels. The goal of levels of maternal care is to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality, including existing disparities, by encouraging the growth and maturation of systems for the provision of risk-appropriate care specific to maternal health needs. To standardize a complete and integrated system of perinatal regionalization and risk-appropriate maternal care, this classification system establishes levels of maternal care that pertain to basic care (level I), specialty care (level II), subspecialty care (level III), and regional perinatal health care centers (level IV). The determination of the appropriate level of care to be provided by a given facility should be guided by regional and state health care entities, national accreditation and professional organization guidelines, identified regional perinatal health care service needs, and regional resources. State and regional authorities should work together with the multiple institutions within a region, and with the input from their obstetric care providers, to determine the appropriate coordinated system of care and to implement policies that promote and support a regionalized system of care. These relationships enhance the ability of women to give birth safely in their communities while providing support for circumstances when higher level resources are needed. This document is a revision of the original 2015 Levels of Maternal Care Obstetric Care Consensus, which has been revised primarily to clarify terminology and to include more recent data based on published literature and feedback from levels of maternal care implementation.

Putting the "M" back in maternal-fetal medicine: A 5-year report card on a collaborative effort to address maternal morbidity and mortality in the United States.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have demonstrated continuous increased risk for maternal mortality and severe morbidity with racial disparities among non-Hispanic black women an important contributing factor. More than 50,000 women experienced severe maternal morbidity in 2014, with a mortality rate of 18.0 per 100,000, higher than in many other developed countries. In 2012, the first "Putting the 'M' back in Maternal-Fetal Medicine" session was held at the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine's (SMFM) Annual Meeting. With the realization that rising risk for severe maternal morbidity and mortality required action, the "M in MFM" meeting identified the following urgent needs: (i) to enhance education and training in maternal care for maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) fellows; (ii) to improve the medical care and management of pregnant women across the country; and (iii) to address critical research gaps in maternal medicine. Since that first meeting, a broad collaborative effort has made a number of major steps forward, including the proliferation of maternal mortality review committees, advances in research, increasing educational focus on maternal critical care, and development of comprehensive clinical strategies to reduce maternal risk. Five years later, the 2017 M in MFM meeting served as a "report card" looking back at progress made but also looking forward to what needs to be done over the next 5 years, given that too many mothers still experience preventable harm and adverse outcomes.

Maternal Mortality in the Twenty-First Century.

Maternal mortality plagues much of the world. There were 303,000 maternal deaths in 2015 representing an overall global maternal mortality ratio of 216 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births. In the United States, the maternal mortality ratio had been decreasing until 1987, remained stable until 1999, and then began to increase. Racial disparities exist in the rates of maternal mortality in the United States with maternal death affecting a higher proportion of black women compared with white women. To reduce maternal mortality, national organizations in the United States have called for standardized review of cases of maternal morbidity and mortality.

Next steps to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality in the USA.

Maternal mortality is rising in the USA. The pregnancy-related maternal mortality ratio increased from 10/100,000 to 17/100,000 live births from the 1990s to 2012. A large proportion of maternal deaths are preventable. This review highlights a national approach to reduce maternal death and morbidity and discusses multiple efforts to reduce maternal morbidity, death and improve obstetric safety. These efforts include communication and collaboration between all stake holders involved in perinatal health, creation of national bundles addressing key maternal care areas such as hemorrhage management, call for all obstetric hospitals to review and analyze all cases of severe maternal morbidity, and access to contraception. Implementation of interventions based on these efforts is a national imperative to improve obstetric safety.

Levels of maternal care.

In the 1970s, studies demonstrated that timely access to risk-appropriate neonatal and obstetric care could reduce perinatal mortality. Since the publication of the Toward Improving the Outcome of Pregnancy report, more than 3 decades ago, the conceptual framework of regionalization of care of the woman and the newborn has been gradually separated with recent focus almost entirely on the newborn. In this current document, maternal care refers to all aspects of antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum care of the pregnant woman. The proposed classification system for levels of maternal care pertains to birth centers, basic care (level I), specialty care (level II), subspecialty care (level III), and regional perinatal health care centers (level IV). The goal of regionalized maternal care is for pregnant women at high risk to receive care in facilities that are prepared to provide the required level of specialized care, thereby reducing maternal morbidity and mortality in the United States.

Standardized severe maternal morbidity review: rationale and process.

Severe maternal morbidity and mortality have been rising in the United States. To begin a national effort to reduce morbidity, a specific call to identify all pregnant and postpartum women experiencing admission to an intensive care unit or receipt of 4 or more units of blood for routine review has been made. While advocating for review of these cases, no specific guidance for the review process was provided. Therefore, the aim of this expert opinion is to present guidelines for a standardized severe maternal morbidity interdisciplinary review process to identify systems, professional, and facility factors that can be ameliorated, with the overall goal of improving institutional obstetric safety and reducing severe morbidity and mortality among pregnant and recently pregnant women. This opinion was developed by a multidisciplinary working group that included general obstetrician-gynecologists, maternal-fetal medicine subspecialists, certified nurse-midwives, and registered nurses all with experience in maternal mortality reviews. A process for standardized review of severe maternal morbidity addressing committee organization, review process, medical record abstraction and assessment, review culture, data management, review timing, and review confidentiality is presented. Reference is made to a sample severe maternal morbidity abstraction and assessment form.

Standardized severe maternal morbidity review: rationale and process.

Severe maternal morbidity and mortality have been rising in the United States. To begin a national effort to reduce morbidity, a specific call to identify all pregnant and postpartum women experiencing admission to an intensive care unit or receipt of four or more units of blood for routine review has been made. While advocating for review of these cases, no specific guidance for the review process was provided. Therefore, the aim of this expert opinion is to present guidelines for a standardized severe maternal morbidity interdisciplinary review process to identify systems, professional, and facility factors that can be ameliorated, with the overall goal of improving institutional obstetric safety and reducing severe morbidity and mortality among pregnant and recently pregnant women. This opinion was developed by a multidisciplinary working group that included general obstetrician­gynecologists, maternal­fetal medicine subspecialists, certified nurse­midwives, and registered nurses all with experience in maternal mortality reviews. A process for standardized review of severe maternal morbidity addressing committee organization, review process, medical record abstraction and assessment, review culture, data management, review timing, and review confidentiality is presented. Reference is made to a sample severe maternal morbidity abstraction and assessment form.

Divergent views of hope influencing communications between parents and hospital providers.

This study evaluated parents' and health care providers' (HCPs) descriptions of hope following counseling of parents at risk of delivering an extremely premature infant. Data came from a longitudinal multiple case study investigation that examined the decision making and support needs of 40 families and their providers. Semistructured interviews were conducted before and after delivery. Divergent viewpoints of hope were found between parents and many HCPs and were subsequently coded using content analysis. Parents relied on hope as an emotional motivator, whereas most HCPs described parents' notions of hope as out of touch with reality. Parents perceived that such divergent beliefs about the role of hope negatively shaped communicative interactions and reduced trust with some of their providers. A deeper understanding of how varying views of hope might shape communications will uncover future research questions and lead to theory-based interventions aimed at improving the process of discussing difficult news with parents.

Life support decisions for extremely premature infants: report of a pilot study.

The purpose of this pilot study was to describe decision making and the decision support needs of parents, physicians, and nurses regarding life support decisions made over time prenatally and postnatally for extremely premature infants. Using the collective case study method, one prenatal, one postnatal, and one postdeath, if the infant had died, tape-recorded interviews were conducted with each parent. With parents' permission, prenatal interviews were done with the physicians and nurses who talked to them about life support decisions for their infants. Twenty-five tape-recorded interviews were conducted with six cases (six mothers, two fathers, six physicians, and two nurses). Hospital records were reviewed for documentation of life support decisions. Results of this pilot study demonstrated that most parents wanted a model of shared decision making and perceived that they were informed and involved in making decisions. Parents felt that to be involved in decision making they needed information and recommendations from physicians. Parents also stressed the importance of encouragement and hope. In contrast, physicians informed parents but most physicians felt that parents were the decision makers. Physicians used parameters to offer options or involve parents in decisions and became very directive at certain gestational ages. Nurses reported that they believed that parents needed information from the physician first, then they would reinforce information. The results of this study offer an initial understanding of the decision support needs of parents.

The continuum of maternal morbidity and mortality: factors associated with severity.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to examine whether sociodemographic, clinical, and other service-related factors, as well as preventability issues affect a woman's progression along the continuum of morbidity and mortality. STUDY DESIGN: This was a case-control study of pregnancy-related deaths, women with near-miss morbidity, and those with other severe, but not life threatening, morbidity. Factors associated with maternal outcome were examined. RESULTS: Provider factors (related to preventability) and clinical diagnosis were significantly associated with progression along the continuum after controlling for sociodemographic characteristics (P < .01 for both associations). CONCLUSION: In order to improve mortality rates, we must understand maternal morbidity and how it may lead to death. This study shows that important initiatives include addressing preventability, in particular, provider factors, which may play a role in moving women along the continuum of morbidity and mortality.

A scoring system identified near-miss maternal morbidity during pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop a scoring system for identifying women with near-miss maternal morbidity, and differentiating these women from those with severe but not life-threatening conditions. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The study was conducted at the University of Illinois Medical Center at Chicago (UIMC), which is a tertiary care hospital with approximately 2,220 births per year. UIMC is in a major urban area serving a predominantly African-American and Latina population. This article focuses on five clinical factors: organ failure (>/=1 system), extended intubation (>12 hr), ICU admission, surgical intervention, and transfusion (>3 units), grouped into several scoring system alternatives. The total score on each scoring system was calculated as the weighted sum of the clinical factors present for each woman. RESULTS: The five-factor scoring system had the highest specificity (93.9%), but the four-factor scoring system, which eliminated organ system failure for simplification of data collection, still had a specificity of 78.1%. CONCLUSION: Near-miss morbidities identified using the scoring systems presented can be incorporated into clinical case review and epidemiologic studies to enhance the monitoring of obstetric care and to improve estimates of the incidence of life-threatening complications in pregnancy.