Comparative Interrupted Time Series Analysis of Medical Expenses in Patients with Intertrochanteric Fracture Who Underwent Internal Fixation and Hemiarthroplasty.

Purpose: The objective of this study was to assess postoperative direct medical expenses and medical utilization of elderly patients who underwent either hemiarthroplasty (HA) or internal fixation (IF) for treatment of a femoral intertrochanteric fracture and to analyze differences according to surgical methods and age groups. Materials and Methods: Data from the 2011 to 2018 Korean National Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service database were used. Risk-set matching was performed for selection of controls representing patients with the same sex, age, and year of surgery. A comparative interrupted time series analysis was performed for evaluation of differences in medical expenses and utilization between the two groups. Results: A total of 10,405 patients who underwent IF surgery and 10,405 control patients who underwent HA surgery were included. Medical expenses were 18% lower in the IF group compared to the HA group during the first year after the fracture (difference-in-difference [DID] estimate ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-0.87, P<0.001), and 9% lower in the second year (DID estimate ratio 0.91, 95% CI 0.85-0.99, P=0.018). Length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the IF group compared to the HA group during the first two years after time zero in the age ≥80 group. Conclusion: A noticeable increase in medical expenses was observed for patients who underwent HA for treatment of intertrochanteric fractures compared to those who underwent IF over a two-year period after surgery. Therefore, consideration of such findings is critical when designing healthcare policy support for management of intertrochanteric fractures.

Comparative Interrupted Time Series Analysis of Direct Medical Expense and Length of Stay in Elderly Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures Who Underwent Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hemiarthroplasty: A Real World Nationwide Database Study.

Background: The objective of our study was to analyze the postoperative direct medical expenses and hospital lengths of stay (LOS) of elderly patients who had undergone either hemiarthroplasty (HA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) for femoral neck fractures and to determine the indication of THA by comparing those variables between the 2 groups by time. Methods: In this comparative large-sample cohort study, we analyzed data from the 2011 to 2018 Korean National Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. The included patients were defined as elderly individuals aged 60 years or older who underwent HA or THA for a femoral neck fracture. A 1:1 risk-set matching was performed on the propensity score, using a nearest-neighbor matching algorithm with a maximum caliper of 0.01 of the hazard components. In comparative interrupted time series analysis, time series were constructed using the time unit of one-quarter before and after 3 years from time zero. For the segmented regression analysis, we utilized a generalized linear model with a gamma distribution and logarithmic link function. Results: A total of 4,246 patients who received THA were matched and included with 4,246 control patients who underwent HA. Although there was no statistically significant difference in direct medical expense and hospital LOS for the first 6 months after surgery, direct medical expenses and hospital LOS in THA were relatively reduced compared to the HA up to 24 months after surgery (p < 0.05). In the subgroup analysis, the THA group's hospital LOS decreased significantly compared to that of the HA group during the 7 to 36 months postoperative period in the 65 ≤ age < 80 age group (p < 0.05). Direct medical expenses of the THA group significantly decreased compared to those of the HA group during the period from 7 to 24 months after surgery in the men group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: When performing THA in elderly patients with femoral neck fractures, the possibility of survival for at least 2 years should be considered from the perspective of medical expense and medical utilization. Additionally, in healthy and active male femoral neck fracture patients under the age of 80 years, THA may be more recommended than HA.

Long-term Effectiveness of the National Diabetes Quality Assessment Program in South Korea.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the long-term effectiveness of the national diabetes quality assessment program (NDQAP) in diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: From the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database, 399,984 individuals with diabetes who visited a primary care clinic from 1 July 2012 to 30 June 2013 were included and followed up until 31 May 2021. The NDQAP included five quality assessment indicators: regular outpatient visits, continuity of prescriptions, regular testing of glycated hemoglobin and lipids, and regular fundus examination. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for diabetes complications and all-cause mortality by the achievement of quality assessment indicators. RESULTS: During the mean follow-up duration of 7.6 ± 1.8 years, 20,054 cases (5.0%) of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), 6,281 end-stage kidney diseases (ESKD; 1.6%), 1,943 amputations (0.5%), 9,706 myocardial infarctions (MIs; 2.4%), 26,975 strokes (6.7%), and 35,799 all-cause mortality (8.9%) occurred. Each achievement of quality assessment indicator was associated with a decreased risk of diabetes complications and all-cause mortality. Individuals who were managed in high-quality institutions had a lower risk of PDR (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.80-0.85), ESKD (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.73-0.81), amputation (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.69-0.83), MI (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.82-0.89), stroke (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.84-0.88), and all-cause mortality (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.94-0.98) than those who were not managed in high-quality institutions. CONCLUSIONS: In Korea, the achievement of NDQAP indicators was associated with a decreased risk of diabetes complications and all-cause mortality.

How Does Medical Policy on the Use of Prophylactic Antibiotics Affect Medical Costs, Length of Hospital Stay, and Antibiotic Use in Orthopedics?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare patients who had undergone spine surgery (SS) and hip arthroplasty surgery (HAS) and to analyze how medical policies drawn from "The Evaluation of the Appropriate Use of Prophylactic Antibiotics" have affected length of hospital stay (LOS), direct medical costs (DMC), and the duration of antibiotics use in Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective nationwide study identified subjects from the Korean National Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database from January, 2011 to December, 2018. Evaluation of HAS (control group) was implemented in 2007, and that for SS (case group) was conducted for the first time in 2014 (intervention time). In our comparative interrupted time series analysis, we compared DMC, LOS, and use of antibiotics between both groups. RESULTS: 177468 patients who underwent SS and 89372 patients who underwent HAS were included in the study. In 2016, DMC increased for HAS, compared to SS, by 1.03 times (p=0.041). However, cost changes during other observational periods for SS were not higher than those for HAS (p>0.05). SS incurred a reduced LOS of 3% in the first 2 years (p<0.05). Thereafter, LOS changes in SS were not smaller than those in HAS. A decrease in the usage of total antibiotics and broad spectrum antibiotics was observed for 5 years. CONCLUSION: This medical policy was effective in terms of reducing usage and duration of antibiotics use, especially in the first 2 years after the implementation of the policy.

Influence of government-driven quality assessment program on patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: The Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) has launched the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Quality Assessment Program (CQAP) since 2014. We aimed to reveal the influence of this national program on clinical outcomes and the burden of COPD in Korea. METHODS: The CQAP is conducted annually. We used healthcare claims data linked with the results of the program provided by HIRA between May 2014 and April 2017. Patients were considered to have COPD if they visited a hospital for COPD management during the assessment term. Those who visited a medical institution for COPD and were prescribed COPD medications at least twice were assessed by the CQAP (assessed subjects, AS; not-assessed subjects, NAS). CQAP evaluated the pulmonary function test conduction rate, regular visitation rate, and prescription rates of COPD medications. RESULTS: Among the 560,000 patients with COPD, about 140,000 were assessed by the CQAP annually. In both groups, the pulmonary function test conduction rate and inhaled bronchodilator prescription rate improved since 2014. Compared to the NAS group, the risk of admission and all-cause mortality rate in the AS group were significantly reduced by 21.2% and 40.7%, respectively. In patients who were assessed for 3 consecutive years, all of the above variables were high at baseline and were not improved much from implementation of CQAP. In matching analysis, we observed this improvement to be limited in the COPD quality assessment year. CONCLUSIONS: The CQAP by the health insurance bureau has improved the management protocol and prognosis of COPD.

The nationwide retrospective cohort study by Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service proves that asthma management decreases the exacerbation risk of asthma.

Medical costs have recently increased in South Korea due to the rising rate of asthma. Primary clinics serve an important role in asthma management, as they are the first stop for patients presenting with symptoms. The Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) in South Korea has assessed asthma-management quality since 2013, but studies are lacking on whether these assessments have been performed properly and contribute toward reducing asthma exacerbations. Therefore, we investigated whether the HIRA's quality assessments have decreased asthma exacerbations using national health insurance claims data from 2013 to 2017 of 83,375 primary-clinic and 15,931 tertiary-hospital patients with asthma. These patients were classified into four groups based on disease severity according to the monthly prescribed amount of asthma medication using K-means clustering. The associations between HIRA assessments and asthma exacerbation were analyzed using a generalized estimating equation. Our results showed that exacerbation odds gradually decreased as the HIRA assessments progressed, especially in the mild-severity group, and that exacerbation risk among patients with asthma decreased in the order of assessment grades: "Unsatisfactory," "Satisfactory," and "Tertiary." Therefore, we may conclude that asthma exacerbations may decrease with high quality asthma management; appropriate quality assessment could be helpful in reducing asthma exacerbations.

Impact of the Asthma Quality Assessment Program on Burden of Asthma.

BACKGROUND: In 2013, the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service launched the Asthma Quality Assessment Program (AQAP) to assess whether patients with asthma were well managed. OBJECTIVE: To show the impact of the AQAP on the medical utilization behavior for asthma. METHODS: We used claims data linked with the results of the AQAP performed between July 2013 and June 2017. Asthma was determined when subjects visited hospital for asthma. Subjects who used asthma medications on at least 2 different occasions were assessed by the AQAP (assessed subjects [Ass]; not-assessed subjects [NASs]). The AQAP evaluated conduction rate of the pulmonary function test, routine visit rate, and prescription rate of asthma medications. Primary clinics were classified as "good" and "not-good" clinics according to the results of the AQAP. RESULTS: Of the 4.3 million subjects with asthma screened, about 0.8 million were assessed by the AQAP annually. Both the conduction rate of pulmonary function test and the prescription rate of inhaled corticosteroids in the ASs and NASs were improved. In addition, the risk of admission and yearly all-cause mortality were significantly reduced (risk reduction rate, 17.1 and 24.4%, respectively, both P < .001) in the AS group compared with the NAS group. However, effects of the AQAP varied according to the subgroup, and they were restricted to the assessment term. In addition, the admission rate and all-cause mortality were decreased by 94.7% and 45.3%, respectively, in "good" clinics as opposed to the "not-good" clinics. CONCLUSIONS: Performing the AQAP improved both the management protocol and prognosis of asthma in Korea.

Relationship Between Changes in Inhalation Treatment Level and Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Nationwide the Health Insurance and Assessment Service Database.

Background and Objective: Maintaining adequacy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) care is essential to sustain an adequate level of care. We aimed to assess the current status of COPD quality control and the influence of inhaler changes on disease-related health care utilization. Methods: The Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) nationwide database for reimbursed insurance claims from all medical institutions in South Korea from May 2014 to April 2017 was investigated. COPD care quality was assessed by the performance rate of spirometry, the percentage of persistent visit patients and patients prescribed a bronchodilator. The number of severe exacerbations was evaluated. Results: A total of 68,942 COPD patients were included for 3 years of longitudinal analyses. The overall spirometry enforcement rate was just over 50%, the percentage of regular follow-up patients was over 85%, and bronchodilators were prescribed to over 80% of the patients. COPD-related hospitalization or ER visit rates were 16.6%, 15.3%, and 17.8% for three consequent assessments, respectively. Inhaler changes were analyzed between the first and second assessments: 57.1% were maintained, 0.4% were changed to another class, 9% were escalated, and 5.2% were de-escalated. Only in the escalated group, especially those who changed from the mono to dual inhaler and dual to triple inhaler, had fewer hospitalizations or ER visits. Conclusion: Adequacy of COPD care status was not that high considering the low-enforcement rate of spirometry, but most patients were prescribed a bronchodilator and regularly followed up. Those who escalated inhaler treatment experienced less health care utilization.

Nationwide quality assessment of treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requires careful ambulatory care. If treatment is effective, exacerbation and hospitalization can be preventable. Appropriate management is important; the disease prevalence is high, as is the demand on healthcare resources. Here, we have reported the results of nationwide quality assessment performed with the aims of improving patient management, reducing progression to severe status, and minimizing medical care expenses. METHODS: The Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) engaged in quality assessment three times from May 2014 to April 2017. Medical care institutions were evaluated in terms of the pulmonary function test (PFT), patient revisit, and inhaled bronchodilator prescription rates. RESULTS: The numbers of patients assessed were 141,782, 142,790, and 143,339 in years 1, 2, and 3, respectively; the numbers of medical care institutions assessed were 6,691, 6,722, and 6,470, respectively. The PFT implementation rates were 58.7%, 62.5%, and 67.9% for years 1, 2, and 3, respectively; these rates were highest for tertiary hospitals, followed by general and local hospitals, as well as primary healthcare clinics. The repeat visit rates were 85.5%, 92.1%, and 85.0% for years 1, 2, and 3, respectively; these rates were highest for general hospitals, followed by local and tertiary hospitals, and primary healthcare clinics. The inhaled bronchodilator prescription rates were 67.9%, 71.2%, and 76.9% for years 1, 2, and 3, respectively; these rates increased with increasing hospital grade. CONCLUSIONS: The PFT and inhaled bronchodilator prescription rates improved over the 3-year nationwide quality assessment period.

Current status of asthma care in South Korea: nationwide the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database.

BACKGROUND: Quality control is important for patients with asthma because of its prevalence and because the social burden is substantial. This study analyzed the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) database to assess asthma quality control in South Korea. METHODS: We investigated the HIRA nationwide database for reimbursed insurance claims from all medical institutions in South Korea from July 2013 to June 2014. The number of patients with asthma were evaluated and the medical institutions were categorized by type of medical institution. Asthma care quality was assessed by measuring the performance rate on pulmonary function test (PFT) and investigating prescriptions for asthma medications. RESULTS: A total of 16,804 medical institutions and 831,613 patients were included in this study. Among them, primary health clinics accounted for 87.75% of all medical institutions and 82.50% of patients were treated in a primary health clinic. The overall PFT performance rate was 23.47%, which was highest in tertiary hospitals (80.59%) and relatively lower in primary health clinics (17.06%). Oral agents were prescribed to 93.96% of patients, whereas inhaled agents were prescribed to only 30.34%. Oral corticosteroids were prescribed to 40.61% of patients, leukotriene antagonists to 48.78%, and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) to 25.37% of patients by drug category. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with asthma were treated in primary health clinics rather than higher class medical institutions. Asthma quality control was poor regarding usage of diagnostic measures and prescribed medications.

Different policy outcomes of the new drugs and currently listed drugs under the positive list system in South Korea.

Four years have passed since the positive list system was implemented in South Korea. The system was received well because it has fulfilled its intended objective of enhancing the cost-effectiveness of new drugs. With regard to currently listed drugs, however, debate has lingered since the reevaluation of the cost-effectiveness by therapeutic group. This study intended to review the lessons learned and compromises reached in implementing an evidence-based national formulary. Currently listed drugs are very different from new drugs. In terms of effectiveness, the level of existing evidence tends to be lower for currently listed drugs. Also, the evaluation plan was quite delayed because of the vast amount of literature. In the political decision-making process, a coalition was formed by the pharmaceutical companies with physicians, and the government had difficulty responding because of the strong resistance against the reevaluation of currently listed drugs. Although idealistic, it was an attempt to apply the same standard of cost-effectiveness for currently listed drugs as that for new drugs. To successfully implement the system, however, some factors that need to be considered were limitation of available evidence on currently listed drugs and specific strategies employed against political resistance.

Drug reimbursement decision-making in Thailand, China, and South Korea.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a comparison of national drug reimbursement decision-making, including an update of economic evaluation roles and barriers, in Thailand, China, and South Korea. METHODS: Documentary reviews supplemented by experiences of policymakers. RESULTS: National health insurance policy in all the three countries has been developed toward coverage for all. It leads to higher health-care expenditures and requires a good reimbursement system for health-care services, including drugs. Drug reimbursement decision-making in these countries is to develop a reimbursement list with the help of various committees having different roles. Primarily, they assess the clinical and safety evidence. Economic evidence, including budget impact and pharmacoeconomic evaluation, has also been very important for their reimbursement decision-making. This evidence is sometimes used in negotiation mechanism, which allows pharmaceutical companies to lower their drug prices and leads to lower overall drug expenditures. Several common barriers, for example, human capacity and data availability, for obtaining economic evidence in all the three countries, however, still exist. CONCLUSIONS: Drug reimbursement decision-making in Thailand, China, and South Korea is in its transition period. It seems to run in the same direction, for example, guideline development and pharmacoeconomic evaluation agency establishment. Pharmacoeconomic evaluation plays important roles in the efficiency of drug reimbursement decision-making, even though there are several barriers to be overcome.