Low-dose nivolumab can be effective in non-small cell lung cancer: alternative option for financial toxicity.

OBJECTIVES: Nivolumab is used at 3 mg/kg or fixed doses of 240 mg every 2 weeks. There was no dose-response/toxicity relationship of nivolumab. This study evaluated the efficacy of low-dose nivolumab as an alternative to the financial toxicity of standard-dose nivolumab in treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Outcomes of patients with NSCLC treated with nivolumab as a routine practice at two tertiary hospitals in Korea were retrospectively analysed. Patients who could not afford standard nivolumab treatment received low-dose nivolumab (20 or 100 mg fixed dose every 3 weeks). Others received standard dose of 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were measured and compared between low-dose and standard-dose groups in overall and stratified analyses according to programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status. RESULTS: Among the 47 patients with NSCLC, 18 received low-dose nivolumab. PD-L1 positivity was observed in 13 (27.7%) patients and did not differ between the groups. During 5.2 months of follow-up, the objective response rate was 13.8% in the standard-dose group and 16.7% in the low-dose group (p=0.788). Dosing of nivolumab or PD-L1 expression did not significantly affect PFS or OS. CONCLUSION: Low-dose nivolumab can be effective in NSCLC and is worth considering as an alternative option to reducing financial toxicity. The efficacy of low-dose nivolumab requires study.

The Impact of Molecularly Targeted Treatment on Direct Medical Costs in Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of targeted treatment on direct medical costs of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of 108 stage IIIB/IV NSCLC patients treated in Seoul National University Hospital between 2003 and 2009, were reviewed to collect medical resources utilization data from the diagnosis of stage IIIB/IV NSCLC to the end of active anti-cancer treatment. The direct medical costs were calculated by multiplying the number of medical resources used by the unit price. All costs were expressed in US dollars for each patient. RESULTS: The mean total direct medical costs were $34,732 (standard deviation, 21,168) in the study cohort. The mean total direct medical costs were higher in epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR ) mutation (EGFR MT)-positive patients than EGFR wild-type (EGFR WT) patients ($41,403 vs. $30,146, p=0.005). However, the mean monthly direct medical costs did not differ significantly between EGFR MT-positive patients and EGFR WT patients ($2,120 vs. $2,702, p=0.119) because of the longer duration of active anti-cancer treatment in EGFR MT-positive patients. This discrepancy was mainly attributable to EGFR MT-positive patients' lower non-chemotherapy costs ($948 vs. $1,522, p=0.007). The total and monthly direct medical costs of ALK fusion-positive patients who did not receive ALK inhibitors did not differ from WT/WT patients. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the availability of targeted agents for EGFR MT-positive patients lowers the mean monthly medical costs by prolonging survival and diminishing the use of other medical resources, despite the considerable drug costs.