Correlation between the ratio of physician consultation fees to hourly minimum wage and consultation length: a cross-sectional study of nine countries.

OBJECTIVES: Current healthcare reimbursement system is criticised for not adequately compensating physicians' cognitive services. This study was performed to examine primary care physicians' consultation fees in nine countries, relative to the national hourly minimum wage and to examine the correlations of the physician consultation fee with consultation length and other healthcare indices. DESIGN AND OUTCOME MEASURES: Nine reference countries for which healthcare statistics are publicly available and outpatient consultation is compensated by fee-for-service payment were selected. A representative consultation fee was chosen to calculate the ratio of the consultation fee to the hourly minimum wage. The primary outcome was the correlation between the consultation fee/hourly minimum wage ratio and consultation length. In addition, the consultation fees were compared with fees for haemoglobin A1c tests and brain imaging. Pearson's method was primarily used for correlation analysis. RESULTS: The mean representative consultation fee/hourly minimum wage ratio was 4.02 (median, 2.7; range, 0.80-10.36). The mean consultation length was 12.9 min (median, 14.7 min; range, 5-21.1 min). A significant correlation (r=0.79) was found between consultation length and the consultation fee/hourly minimum wage ratio. The ratio of consultation fee to hourly minimum wage was moderately negatively correlated with the annual number of physician visits, number of consultations per doctor and length of hospital stay. The brain CT fee/consultation fee ratio was moderately positively correlated with the number of CT units per 1 million population. In Japan and Korea, where the brain CT/consultation fee ratio was highest, the number of CT examinations per population was also highest. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship of consultation fees to each country's hourly minimum wage varied in nine reference countries; however, it was strongly correlated with consultation length. The imbalance in compensation for cognitive services might drive increased use of imaging tests in some countries.

Relationship between the appropriateness of antibiotic treatment and clinical outcomes/medical costs of patients with community-acquired acute pyelonephritis: a multicenter prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate use of antibiotics not only increases antibiotic resistance as collateral damage but also increases clinical failure rates and medical costs. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the appropriateness of antibiotic prescription and outcomes of community-acquired acute pyelonephritis (CA-APN). METHODS: A multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted at eight hospitals in Korea between September 2017 and August 2018. All hospitalized patients aged ≥ 19 years who were diagnosed with CA-APN on admission were recruited. The appropriateness of empirical and definitive antibiotics, as well as the appropriateness of antibiotic treatment duration and route of administration, was evaluated in accordance with the guideline and expert opinions. Clinical outcomes and medical costs were compared between patients who were administered antibiotics 'appropriately' and 'inappropriately.' RESULTS: A total of 397 and 318 patients were eligible for the analysis of the appropriateness of empirical and definitive antibiotics, respectively. Of them, 10 (2.5%) and 18 (5.7%) were administered 'inappropriately' empirical and definitive antibiotics, respectively. Of the 119 patients whose use of both empirical and definitive antibiotics was classified as 'optimal,' 57 (47.9%) received antibiotics over a longer duration than that recommended; 67 (56.3%) did not change to oral antibiotics on day 7 of hospitalization, even after stabilization of the clinical symptoms. Patients who were administered empirical antibiotics 'appropriately' had shorter hospitalization days (8 vs. 10 days, P = 0.001) and lower medical costs (2381.9 vs. 3235.9 USD, P = 0.002) than those who were administered them 'inappropriately.' Similar findings were observed for patients administered both empirical and definitive antibiotics 'appropriately' and those administered either empirical or definitive antibiotics 'inappropriately'. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate use of antibiotics leads to better outcomes, including reduced hospitalization duration and medical costs.

Trends in hospital visits and healthcare costs of gout and seropositive rheumatoid arthritis in Korea from 2010 to 2017 using National Healthcare Claims.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We examined temporal trends in the rate of gout and seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) hospital visits and healthcare costs in Korea. METHODS: We conducted a serial cross-sectional analysis of Korean national healthcare claims. We calculated the annual increase in hospital visits (emergency department [ED] visits, outpatient visits, and hospitalizations) and total healthcare costs per visit. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2017, the annual rates of ED visits, outpatient visits, and hospitalizations for gout increased from 6.28 to 21, from 638.38 to 1059.55, and from 12.37 to 15.6 per 100,000 persons, respectively. Before 2013, ED visits for gout were most common in patients over 70 years old, but they were most common in those aged between 30 and 49 years after 2013. The number of patients with ED visits, outpatient visits, and hospitalizations for RA from 2010 to 2017 increased from 1.25 to 1.87, from 219.04 to 307.49 and from 8.44 to 12.32 per 100,000 persons, respectively. However, there was no increase in the prevalence of ED visits for RA in any age group except for those older than 70 years. The cost per ED visit for gout significantly decreased from 496.3 to 273.6 US dollar during the study period. There was no significant change in the cost per ED visit for RA between 2010 and 2017. CONCLUSION: There was a large increase in ED visits for gout during the study period. Further studies are needed to analyze the reason behind increased ED visits for gout and suggest ways on how to improve gout care.

Hourly wages of physicians within medical fees based on the Korean relative value unit system.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: It is difficult to reach a social agreement on the appropriate level of compensation for professionals. This study was performed to examine the physician fee embedded in the relative value unit (RVU) system in comparison with the Korean hourly minimum wage. METHODS: The Health Insurance Service Price and the Korean Classification of Procedural Terminology were used to obtain the hourly wages of physicians for designated health care services. In addition, the physician fee schedule at the United States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) report on minimal wage were used. Health care service fees were selected based on laboratory, pathology, imaging, and procedure codes as well as examination fees. For calculation of physician labor costs per hour, physician workload × conversion factor was divided by the time involved. To calculate the proportion of physician labor fee in the total fee, the physician workload RVU for each service fee was divided by the total RVU. RESULTS: A total of 27 physician fee codes were selected. Compared to the Korean hourly minimum wage in 2015, the average physician wages were greater by 2.80- fold for primary care and by 3.05-fold for tertiary care. The mean proportion of physician labor cost in the total cost was 0.19, which was significantly lower than that of corresponding procedures in the United States RVU (mean, 0.48). CONCLUSION: The average Korean physician wages compared to the hourly minimum wage were disproportionately low compared to the USA and other reference OECD countries.

Survival rates following medical intensive care unit admission from 2003 to 2013: An observational study based on a representative population-based sample cohort of Korean patients.

The decision as to whether patients should be admitted to a medical intensive care unit (ICU), in the absence of information concerning survival rates or prognostic factors in survival, is often challenging. We analyzed survival trends in relation to hospital discharge and examined patient and hospital characteristics associated with survival following ICU care, using a sample of nationwide claims data in Korea from 2002 through 2013. The Korean government implements a compulsory social insurance program that covers the country's entire population, and the Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC) data from 2002 based on this program were used for this study. The NHIS-NSC is a stratified random sample of 1,025,340 subjects selected from around 46 million Koreans. We evaluated annual survival trends using the Kaplan-Meier test. Analyses of the relationship between survival and patient and hospital characteristics were performed using Cox regression analyses. Employing a multivariate model, variables were selected using the forward selection method to consider the multicollinearity of variables. A total of 32,553 patients admitted to an ICU between 2002 and 2013 were identified among the eligible beneficiaries. The number of patients who had histories of ICU admission steadily increased throughout the study period, and patients older than 80 years constituted a progressively increasing proportion of ICU admissions, from 7.3% in 2002 to 16.9% in 2007 to 23.1% in 2013. The mean number of mechanical equipment items applied consistently increased, while no difference was observed in the trend for overall 1-year survival in patients following ICU treatment across the study period: the 1-year survival rate ranged from 66.7% (year 2003) to 64.2% (year 2010). Advanced age, cancer, renal failure, pneumonia, and influenza were all associated with heightened risk of mortality within 1 year. Our results should prove useful to older patients and their clinicians in their decisions regarding whether to seek ICU care, with the goals of improving the end-of life care and optimizing resource utilization.

Rheumatoid arthritis patients fulfilling Korean National Health Insurance reimbursement guidelines for anti-tumor necrosis factor-α treatment and comparison to other guidelines.

The aim of this study was to compare anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) treatment status in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with the Korean National Health Insurance (KNHI) reimbursement eligibility criteria and with American College of Rheumatology (ACR) recommendations, Japan College of Rheumatology (JCR) guidelines and British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) guidelines. Between December 2011 and August 2012, outpatients from 17 South Korean general hospitals diagnosed with RA according to the 1987 ACR criteria were enrolled into a noninterventional, cross-sectional, observational study. Of 1700 patients (1414 female (83.2 %), mean age of 56.6 ± 12.0, mean disease duration 97.9 ± 91.8 months), 306 (18.0 %) had used anti-TNFα agents, and 224 (13.2 %) were currently using an anti-TNFα agent. Of 1394 anti-TNFα-naive patients, 32 (2.3 %) met KNHI reimbursement guidelines, 148 (10.6 %) met ACR recommendations, and 127 (9.1 %) and 126 (9.0 %) were considered eligible for anti-TNFα agents according to JCR and BSR guidelines, respectively. The main discrepancy was the higher active joint count required by the KNHI eligibility criteria. In the opinion of treating rheumatologists, the KNHI reimbursement criteria ineligibility accounted for 15.3 % (n = 213) of the reasons for not initiating anti-TNFα agents in anti-TNFα-naive group. The anti-TNFα user group showed significantly higher disease activity than the anti-TNFα-naive group based on DAS28 score. In comparison with the ACR recommendations and JCR and BSR guidelines, fewer patients met KNHI reimbursement eligibility criteria for anti-TNFα agents. The current amendment of the KNHI criteria based on DAS28 score will improve an access to biologic agents including anti-TNFα treatment for South Korean patients with active RA.

[Availability of fine needle aspirates for the assessment of HER2 gene amplification in invasive breast cancer patients].

BACKGROUND: FISH and immunohistochemistry (IHC) on formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue are currently used in the clinical laboratory to determine HER2 status in invasive breast cancer patients. Since tissue-based methods are relatively time-consuming and have a limitation for standardization of procedure, we evaluated the availability of fine needle aspirates (FNA) for the assessment of HER2 status in invasive breast cancer patients. METHODS: FNA were obtained from 51 invasive breast cancer patients and were submitted for the evaluation of HER2 status. After invasive breast cancer components were ascertained by morphological evaluation, HER2 gene amplification was evaluated by FISH. The results of HER2 FISH on FNA cells were compared with those of both FISH and IHC on corresponding FFPE tissues. FISH results were interpreted by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines issued in 2007. RESULTS: Of 51 FNA specimens, one was excluded due to an insufficient number of cancer cells for tests. Excluding the cases that showed 'equivocal' results, 47 (98%) out of 48 cases were concordant between the results of FISH on FNA and FISH on corresponding FFPE tissue (kappa, 0.969), and 43 (93%) out of 46 cases were concordant between the results of FISH on FNA and IHC on corresponding FFPE tissue (kappa, 0.912). CONCLUSIONS: An excellent correlation was found between FISH on FNA cells and corresponding FFPE sections. We recommend FNA specimens for more rapid determination of HER2 status by FISH, which will be helpful for patient selection for individualized therapy.

Assessment of comparative pain relief and tolerability of SKI306X compared with celecoxib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 6-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase III, noninferiority clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: SKI306X, which consists of biologically active ingredients from Clematis mandsburica, Tricbosantbes kirilowii, and Prunella vulgaris, was developed and tested in preclinical trials in Korea. Those studies found that SKI306X was associated with an anti-inflammatory and analgesic effect, and that it can delay the destruction of cartilage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the pain relief and tolerability of SKI306X and celecoxib in patients with RA. METHODS: This study was a 6-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, Phase III, noninferiority clinical trial. Eligible patients were aged 18 to 80 years, had a history of RA with a disease duration of > or =3 months, and were functional American College of Rheumatology (ACR) class I, II, or III before entry. After a washout period of 2 weeks, patients were randomized to SKI306X 200 mg TID or celecoxib 200 mg BID for 6 weeks. The primary end point was a change in patient assessment of pain intensity using a visual analog scale (VAS). The secondary end points were a 20% improvement in response rate as defined by the ACR (ACR20) and the frequency of rescue medication use. Results after 3 and 6 weeks of treatment were compared with baseline and between treatment groups, and all patients were assessed for adverse events (AEs), clinical laboratory data, and vital signs. AEs were identified based on spontaneous reports by patients during interviews conducted by the investigators and the study coordinator. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-two Korean patients from 7 medical centers were assessed and 183 were enrolled and randomized to 1 of 2 treatment groups. Ninety-one patients (10 male, 81 female; mean [SD] age, 52.13 [12.64] years; mean [SD] duration of RA, 9.08 [10.23] years; no. [%] of ACR class I, II, and III, 13 [14.29], 44 [48.35] and 34 [37.36] patients, respectively) received SKI306X 200 mg TID and 92 patients (10 male, 82 female; mean [SD] age, 51.78 [10.94] years; mean [SD] duration of RA, 8.78 [7.78] years; no. [%] of ACR class I, II, and III, 14 [15.22], 44 [47.83], and 34 [36.96] patients, respectively) received celecoxib 200 mg BID. An analysis of the change in reported pain intensity as determined by VAS (mm) score between baseline and week 3 (mean [SD], 13.64 [16.62] vs 14.45 [15.89]), and between baseline and week 6 (18.4 [20.8] vs 17.9 [19.1], respectively) suggested that SKI306X was not inferior to celecoxib. The number of patients who achieved ACR20 response rate was not significantly different between the SKI306X group and the celecoxib group at week 3 (16/87 [18.4%] vs 24/87 [27.6%], respectively) and at week 6 (29/87 [33.3%] vs 29/87 [33.3%]). The frequency of rescue medication use was not significantly different between the SKI306X group and celecoxib group at week 3 (54/87 [62.1%] vs 47/87 [54.0%], respectively) or week 6 (57/87 [65.5%] vs 49/87 [56.3%]). Drug-related AEs were reported by 27 (29.7%) patients in the SKI306X group and 22 (23.9%) patients in the celecoxib group. The most frequent drug-related AEs were epigastric pain (9/91 [9.9%]) in the SKI306X group and glutamyltranferase elevation (4/92 [4.3%]) in the celecoxib group. No significant between-group differences were observed in the prevalence of drug-related clinical- or laboratory-determined AEs. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that SKI306X was generally well tolerated and not inferior to celecoxib in regard to pain relief in these Korean patients with RA.

Use of complementary and alternative medicine by arthritis patients in a university hospital clinic serving rheumatology patients in Korea.

There is a paucity of data regarding the use of and attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among arthritis patients in Asia. This study was performed to assess the use of CAM, related demographic and clinical factors, and attitudes among Korean arthritis patients. We conducted a survey of patients in rheumatology clinics affiliated with a university hospital. One hundred fifty patients (68.5%) reported using at least one form of CAM during the previous 12 months. Herbal remedies and acupuncture were the most frequently used categories of CAM. Among the parameters analyzed, income level was significantly and negatively associated with frequent or regular use of CAM. Dialogue about CAM use with Korean patients does not seem to have been initiated yet, as the main reason given for not discussing CAM use with physicians was "not being asked."