Neighborhood characteristics and arterial stiffness among Black adults - Results from the Jackson Heart Study and Morehouse-Emory Cardiovascular Center for Health Equity.

INTRODUCTION: Poor quality neighborhood environments are independent risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) but are understudied in Black adults, who face large CVD health disparities. Arterial stiffness, a marker of early vascular aging, precedes development of hypertension and adverse CVD events but the effect of neighborhood on arterial stiffness among Black adults remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: We compared the association between neighborhood environment and arterial stiffness among Black adults in Jackson, MS and Atlanta, GA. METHODS: We studied 1582 Black adults (mean age 53 ± 10, 35% male) living in Jackson, MS from the Jackson Heart Study (JHS) and 451 Black adults (mean age 53 ± 10, 39% male) living in Atlanta, GA from the Morehouse-Emory Cardiovascular Center for Health Equity (MECA) study, without known CVD. Neighborhood problems (includes measures of aesthetic quality, walking environment, food access), social cohesion (includes activity with neighbors), and violence/safety were assessed using validated questionnaires. Arterial stiffness was measured as pulse wave velocity (PWV) using magnetic resonance imaging in JHS and as PWV and augmentation index (AIx) using applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor, Inc.) in MECA. Multivariable linear regression models were used to examine the association between neighborhood characteristics and arterial stiffness, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Improved social characteristics, measured as social cohesion in JHS (ß = -0.32 [-0.63, -0.02], p = 0.04) and activity with neighbors (ß = -0.23 [-0.40, -0.05], p = 0.01) in MECA, were associated with lower PWV in both cohorts and lower AIx (ß = -1.74 [-2.92, - 0.56], p = 0.004) in MECA, after adjustment for CVD risk factors and income. Additionally, in MECA, better food access (ß = -1.18 [-2.35, - 0.01], p = 0.05) was associated with lower AIx and, in JHS, lower neighborhood problems (ß = -0.33 [-0.64, - 0.02], p = 0.04) and lower violence (ß = -0.30 [-0.61, 0.002], p = 0.05) were associated with lower PWV. CONCLUSION: Neighborhood social characteristics show an independent association with the vascular health of Black adults, findings that were reproducible in two distinct American cities.

Neighborhood characteristics and ideal cardiovascular health among Black adults: results from the Morehouse-Emory Cardiovascular (MECA) Center for Health Equity.

PURPOSE: Neighborhood environment is increasingly recognized as an important determinant of cardiovascular health (CVH) among Black adults. Most research to date has focused on negative aspects of the neighborhood environment, with little attention being paid to the specific positive features, in particular the social environment, that promote cardiovascular resilience among Black adults.We examined whether better neighborhood physical and social characteristics are associated with ideal CVH among Black adults, as measured by Life's Simple 7 (LS7) scores. METHODS: We recruited 392 Black adults (age 53 ± 10 years, 39% men) without known CV disease living in Atlanta, GA. Seven neighborhood domains were assessed via questionnaire: asthetic quality, walking environment, safety, food access, social cohesion, activity with neighbors, and violence. CVH was determined by LS7 scores calculated from measured blood pressure; glucose; cholesterol; body mass index (BMI); and self-reported exercise, diet, and smoking, and categorized into poor (0-8), intermediate (9-10), and ideal (11-14). Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine the association between neighborhood characteristics and the odds of intermediate/ideal CVH categories compared with poor CVH after adjustment for age, gender, household income, education, marital status, and employment status. RESULTS: Better scores in the neighborhood domains of social cohesion and activity with neighbors were significantly associated with higher adjusted odds of ideal LS7 scores (OR 2.02, 95% CI [1.36-3.01] and 1.71 [1.20-2.45] per 1 standard deviation [SD] increase in respective scores). These associations were stronger for both social cohesion (OR 2.61, 95% CI [1.48-4.61] vs. 1.40 [0.82-2.40]) and activity with neighbors (OR 1.82, 95% CI [1.15-2.86] vs. 1.53 [0.84-2.78]) in Black women than men. Specifically, better scores in social cohesion were associated with higher odds of ideal CVH in exercise (OR 1.73 [1.16-2.59]), diet (OR 1.90 [1.11-3.26]), and BMI (OR 1.52 [1.09-2.09]); better scores in activity with neighbors were also similarly associated with higher odds of ideal CVH in exercise (OR 1.48 [1.00-2.19]), diet (OR 2.15 [1.23-3.77]), and BMI (OR 1.45 [1.07-1.98]; per 1 SD in respective scores). CONCLUSIONS: More desirable neighborhood characteristics, particularly social cohesion and activity with neighbors, were associated with better CVH among Black adults.

Individual Psychosocial Resilience, Neighborhood Context, and Cardiovascular Health in Black Adults: A Multilevel Investigation From the Morehouse-Emory Cardiovascular Center for Health Equity Study.

BACKGROUND: Despite well-documented cardiovascular disparities between racial groups, within-race determinants of cardiovascular health among Black adults remain understudied. Factors promoting cardiovascular resilience among Black adults in particular warrant further investigation. Our objective was to examine whether individual psychosocial resilience and neighborhood-level cardiovascular resilience were associated with better cardiovascular health in Black adults, measured utilizing Life's Simple 7 (LS7) scores. METHODS: We assessed LS7 scores in 389 Black adults (mean age, 53±10 years; 39% men) living in Atlanta, Georgia. A composite score of individual psychosocial resilience was created by assessing environmental mastery, purpose in life, optimism, resilient coping, and depressive symptoms. Neighborhood-level cardiovascular resilience was separately determined by the census tract-level rates of cardiovascular mortality/morbidity events. Generalized linear mixed regression models were used to examine the association between individual psychosocial resilience, neighborhood cardiovascular resilience, and LS7 scores. RESULTS: Higher individual psychosocial resilience was significantly associated with higher LS7 (ß=0.38 [0.16-0.59] per 1 SD) after adjustment for sociodemographic factors. Similarly, higher neighborhood-level cardiovascular resilience was significantly associated with higher LS7 (ß=0.23 [0.02-0.45] per 1 SD). When jointly examined, high individual psychosocial resilience (>median) was independently associated with higher LS7 (ß=0.73 [0.31-1.17]), whereas living in high-resilience neighborhoods (>median) was not. The largest difference in LS7 score was between those with high and low psychosocial resilience living in low-resilience neighborhoods (8.38 [7.90-8.86] versus 7.42 [7.04-7.79]). CONCLUSIONS: Individual psychosocial resilience in Black adults is associated with better cardiovascular health.

Racial disparities in sleep disturbances among patients with and without coronary artery disease: The role of clinical and socioeconomic factors.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate differences in sleep quality by race in participants with and without a prior myocardial infarction (MI). DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Emory-affiliated hospitals in Atlanta, Georgia. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred seventy-three individuals (190 Black) ≤60 years of age with a verified MI in the previous 8 months, and 100 community controls (44 Black) without a history of MI. MEASUREMENTS: Sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Psychological factors were assessed using standardized questionnaires and clinical risk factors through medical history and chart review. RESULTS: A significant interaction existed between race and MI status on sleep quality (P= .01), such that Black individuals with a history of MI, but not controls, reported worse sleep quality than their non-Black counterparts. Among MI cases, being Black was independently associated with higher PSQI scores after adjusting for baseline demographics (B = 2.17, 95% confidence interval 1.17, 3.17, P = .006). Clinical risk factors, psychological factors and socioeconomic status (household income and years of education) all contributed equally to explain race-related disparities in sleep among MI cases. After further adjustment for these factors, the association was attenuated and no longer significant (B = 0.70, 95% confidence interval = -0.10, 1.21, P = .26). CONCLUSION: Black post-MI patients, but not healthy controls, have significantly poorer sleep quality than non-Blacks. This difference is driven by a combination of factors, including clinical risk factors, psychological factors as well as adverse socioeconomic conditions among Black individuals with MI.

Cardiovascular Risk and Resilience Among Black Adults: Rationale and Design of the MECA Study.

Background Cardiovascular disease incidence, prevalence, morbidity, and mortality have declined in the past several decades; however, disparities persist among subsets of the population. Notably, blacks have not experienced the same improvements on the whole as whites. Furthermore, frequent reports of relatively poorer health statistics among the black population have led to a broad assumption that black race reliably predicts relatively poorer health outcomes. However, substantial intraethnic and intraracial heterogeneity exists; moreover, individuals with similar risk factors and environmental exposures are often known to experience vastly different cardiovascular health outcomes. Thus, some individuals have good outcomes even in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors, a concept known as resilience. Methods and Results The MECA (Morehouse-Emory Center for Health Equity) Study was designed to investigate the multilevel exposures that contribute to "resilience" in the face of risk for poor cardiovascular health among blacks in the greater Atlanta, GA, metropolitan area. We used census tract data to determine "at-risk" and "resilient" neighborhoods with high or low prevalence of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, based on cardiovascular death, hospitalization, and emergency department visits for blacks. More than 1400 individuals from these census tracts assented to demographic, health, and psychosocial questionnaires administered through telephone surveys. Afterwards, ≈500 individuals were recruited to enroll in a clinical study, where risk biomarkers, such as oxidative stress, and inflammatory markers, endothelial progenitor cells, metabolomic and microRNA profiles, and subclinical vascular dysfunction were measured. In addition, comprehensive behavioral questionnaires were collected and ideal cardiovascular health metrics were assessed using the American Heart Association's Life Simple 7 measure. Last, 150 individuals with low Life Simple 7 were recruited and randomized to a behavioral mobile health (eHealth) plus health coach or eHealth only intervention and followed up for improvement. Conclusions The MECA Study is investigating socioenvironmental and individual behavioral measures that promote resilience to cardiovascular disease in blacks by assessing biological, functional, and molecular mechanisms. REGISTRATION URL: https://www.clini​caltr​ials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03308812.

Assessment of Electrocardiogram Rhythms by GoogLeNet Deep Neural Network Architecture.

The aim of this study is to design GoogLeNet deep neural network architecture by expanding the kernel size of the inception layer and combining the convolution layers to classify the electrocardiogram (ECG) beats into a normal sinus rhythm, premature ventricular contraction, atrial premature contraction, and right/left bundle branch block arrhythmia. Based on testing MIT-BIH arrhythmia benchmark databases, the scope of training/test ECG data was configured by covering at least three and seven R-peak features, and the proposed extended-GoogLeNet architecture can classify five distinct heartbeats; normal sinus rhythm (NSR), premature ventricular contraction (PVC), atrial premature contraction (APC), right bundle branch block (RBBB), and left bundle brunch block(LBBB), with an accuracy of 95.94%, an error rate of 4.06%, a maximum sensitivity of 96.9%, and a maximum positive predictive value of 95.7% for judging a normal or an abnormal beat with considering three ECG segments; an accuracy of 98.31%, a sensitivity of 88.75%, a specificity of 99.4%, and a positive predictive value of 94.4% for classifying APC from NSR, PVC, APC beats, whereas the error rate for misclassifying APC beat was relative low at 6.32%, compared with previous research efforts.

Individual Characteristics of Resilience are Associated With Lower-Than-Expected Neighborhood Rates of Cardiovascular Disease in Blacks: Results From the Morehouse-Emory Cardiovascular (MECA) Center for Health Equity Study.

Background Factors promoting cardiovascular health in the face of high risk, ie, resilience, are unknown and may identify novel areas of intervention for reducing racial health disparities. We examined neighborhood perceptions and psychological attributes of blacks living in high and low cardiovascular-risk neighborhoods, as potential characteristics of resilience promoting cardiovascular health. Methods and Results We identified 1433 blacks residing in census tracts of Atlanta, GA , with higher-than-expected ("high" risk) or lower-than-expected ("low" risk) rates of cardiovascular mortality, hospitalizations, and emergency department visits during 2010-2014. Domains of psychosocial well-being and neighborhood quality were assessed via telephone survey between August 2016 and October 2016. Using multilevel logistic regression, odds of reporting better resilient characteristics were compared between individuals living in low- versus high-risk neighborhoods. Those from low-risk (versus high-risk) neighborhoods reported better neighborhood aesthetic quality (odds ratio [ OR ], 1.84), healthy food access ( OR , 1.69), and absence of violence ( OR , 0.67). Individuals from low-risk neighborhoods reported greater optimism ( OR , 1.38), purpose in life ( OR , 1.42), and fewer depressive symptoms ( OR , 0.69). After full adjustment, these associations remained significant for neighborhood factors (aesthetic quality, healthy food access, violence) and psychosocial well-being (purpose in life). We found no evidence of differences in self-reported cardiovascular risk factors or disease history between low- versus high-risk neighborhoods. Conclusions Positive neighborhood environments and psychological characteristics are associated with low cardiovascular-risk neighborhoods, despite similar prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, in the census tracts studied. These factors may confer cardiovascular resilience among blacks.

Identification of Resilient and At-Risk Neighborhoods for Cardiovascular Disease Among Black Residents: the Morehouse-Emory Cardiovascular (MECA) Center for Health Equity Study.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the growing interest in place as a determinant of health, areas that promote rather than reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) in blacks are understudied. We performed an ecologic analysis to identify areas with high levels of CVD resilience and risk among blacks from a large southern, US metropolitan area. METHODS: We obtained census tract-level rates of cardiovascular deaths, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalizations for black adults aged 35 to 64 from 2010 through 2014 for the Atlanta, Georgia, metropolitan area. Census tracts with substantially lower rates of cardiovascular events on the basis of neighborhood socioeconomic status were identified as resilient and those with higher rates were identified as at risk. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of being classified as an at-risk versus resilient tract for differences in census-derived measures. RESULTS: We identified 106 resilient and 121 at-risk census tracts, which differed in the rates per 5,000 person years of cardiovascular outcomes (mortality, 8.13 vs 13.81; ED visits, 32.25 vs 146.3; hospitalizations, 26.69 vs 130.0), despite similarities in their median black income ($46,123 vs $45,306). Tracts with a higher percentage of residents aged 65 or older (odds ratio [OR], 2.29; 95% CI, 1.41-3.85 per 5% increment) and those with incomes less than 200% of the federal poverty level (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.02-1.39 per 5% increment) and greater Gini index (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.19- 2.07 per 0.05 increment) were more likely to be classified as at risk than resilient neighborhoods. DISCUSSION: Despite matching on median income level, at-risk neighborhoods for CVD among black populations were associated with a higher prevalence of socioeconomic indicators of inequality than resilient neighborhoods.

Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status and Adverse Outcomes in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease.

Neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) is associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the general population; however, its effect on high-risk patients with prevalent coronary artery disease (CAD) is unclear. We hypothesized "double jeopardy," whereby the association between nSES and adverse outcomes would be greater in high-risk patients with heart failure (HF) and/or previous myocardial infarction (MI) compared with those without. We followed 3,635 patients (mean age 63.2 years, 42% with HF, 25% with previous MI) with known or suspected CAD over a median of 3.3 years for all-cause death and cardiovascular death or nonfatal MI. Patients were categorized by a composite nSES score, and proportional hazards models were used to determine the association between nSES and outcomes. Cross-product interaction terms for previous MI × nSES and HF × nSES were analyzed. Compared with high nSES patients, low nSES patients had increased risk of all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.20, 2.15) and cardiovascular death or MI (subdistribution HR [sHR] = 1.82; 95% CI = 1.30, 2.54). Associations were more pronounced among patients without HF or previous MI. Low nSES patients without HF had a higher risk of all-cause death (HR = 2.27; 95% CI = 1.41, 3.65) compared with those with HF (HR = 1.21; 95% CI = 0.82, 1.77, P interaction = 0.04). Similarly, low nSES patients without previous MI had a higher risk of cardiovascular death or MI (sHR = 2.72; 95% CI = 1.73, 4.28) compared with those with previous MI (sHR = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.58, 1.81, P interaction = 0.02). In conclusion, low nSES was independently associated with all-cause death and cardiovascular death or MI in patients with CAD; however, associations were greater in patients without HF or previous MI compared with those with HF or MI.

Link between a preference for women colonoscopists and social status in Korean women.

BACKGROUND: Although the sex preference in women patients for their colonoscopist has been reported, the characteristics of these women have not been evaluated yet. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics of women who have a specific preference for a man or a woman colonoscopist. DESIGN: Single-center prospective study. SETTING: Academic medical center, from October to November 2005. SUBJECTS: A total of 465 women who visited the Digestive Disease Center. METHODS: Subjects were asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire on the sex preference of the colonoscopist, employment status, and clinical symptoms. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Factors related with sex preference for the colonoscopist. RESULTS: Only 358 subjects (77.0%) completed the questionnaire. Of these, 195 women (54.5%) had no preference, whereas 115 women (32.1%) preferred a woman colonoscopist and 48 women (13.4%) preferred a man colonoscopist. Subjects who preferred women colonoscopists were generally younger (P< .0001), more educated (P< .0001), single (P< .0001), and employed (P< .0001) than the other population. Neither the symptoms of functional dyspepsia nor irritable bowel syndrome were related with the sex preference of the colonoscopist. LIMITATIONS: A self-administered questionnaire study did not investigate specific physician interpersonal or communication styles. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of the women had no sex preference for their colonoscopist, and the sex preference for a specific sex was related to employment status, education level, age, and marital status. Such a sex-based preference in employed, highly educated young women predicts an increasing demand for women colonoscopists in the near future, particularly given the increasing social participation of women in these times of rapid industrialization.