Minimizing Bias in Alopecia Diagnosis in Skin of Color Patients.

Alopecia is one of the most common dermatologic conditions affecting black patients, with a significantly negative impact on quality of life.1,2 Timely and accurate diagnosis is therefore critical in order to reverse or halt progression of disease.3 Unfortunately, lack of representation of skin of color (SOC) patients in the current literature may contribute to misdiagnosis as providers may be unfamiliar with the clinical spectrum of alopecia presenting in darker scalps.4 Some scarring alopecia subtypes such as Central Centrifugal Cicatricial Alopecia (CCCA) are more prevalent in certain racial groups. However, focusing solely on patient demographics and gross clinical findings may obscure accurate diagnoses. To distinguish alopecia findings in Black patients, a dedicated approach using a combination of clinical exam findings and patient history, along with trichoscopy and biopsy, is essential to prevent misdiagnosis and improve clinical and diagnostic outcomes. We present three cases of alopecia in patients of color which the initial suspected clinical diagnosis did not correspond with trichoscopic and biopsy results. We challenge clinicians to reexamine their biases and fully evaluate patients of color with alopecia. An examination should include a thorough history, clinical examination, trichoscopy, and potentially a biopsy, particularly when findings do not correlate. Our cases highlight the challenges and disparities that exist in diagnosis of alopecia in Black patients. We emphasize the need for continued research regarding alopecia in skin of color and the importance of a complete workup for alopecia to improve diagnostic outcomes.Balazic E, Axler E, Nwankwo C, et al. Minimizing bias in alopecia diagnosis in skin of color patients. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(7):703-705. doi:10.36849/JDD.7117.  .

Psychiatric disorders and suicidal behavior in patients with acne prescribed oral antibiotics versus isotretinoin: Analysis of a large commercial insurance claims database.

BACKGROUND: The association between isotretinoin and psychiatric disturbance, including depression and suicidal behavior, is controversial. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether acne patients prescribed isotretinoin or antibiotics were more likely to have psychiatric disorders and/or engage in suicidal behavior. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using the IBM MarketScan Research Databases, which contain commercial insurance claims in the United States, to identify acne patients who were prescribed isotretinoin or oral antibiotics between 2011 and 2017 and who were diagnosed with psychiatric disorders or suicidal behavior. RESULTS: A total of 72,555 patients were included in the study. Patients in the general population were 1.47 times more likely to be diagnosed with suicidal ideation or attempt compared to acne patients prescribed isotretinoin (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.47; confidence interval [95% CI], 1.27, 1.70; P < .0001). The general population (adjusted OR 0.87; 95% CI, 0.84, 0.89; P < .0001) and acne patients prescribed antibiotics (adjusted OR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.85, 0.91; P < .0001) were less likely to have a psychiatric diagnosis compared to acne patients prescribed isotretinoin. The prevalence of suicidal behavior during isotretinoin treatment was lower (0.10%; P = .082) than in the year prior to isotretinoin treatment (0.22%) and in the year following treatment (0.34%; P = .004). LIMITATIONS: The study excluded individuals with public insurance and those who were uninsured, and the data in the study relied on the accuracy of the medical coding. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the general population, acne patients prescribed isotretinoin were less likely to engage in suicidal behavior. Further exploration into the slight increase in suicidal behavior seen in isotretinoin patients 1 year after therapy is warranted.