Ambulatory oxygen therapy with documented self-monitoring of oxygen use improves health status among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Background: Home oxygen therapy is well known to improve survival among patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In Korea, home oxygen therapy has been reimbursed by national health care insurance since 2006. However, an adequate management strategy for home oxygen therapy is not yet established in Korea. This pilot study aimed to develop a new management strategy for home oxygen therapy. Methods: We developed a new home oxygen service strategy for COPD patients. The new strategy consists of patient education materials, "oxygen notes" for oxygen use self-monitoring, and provision of ambulatory oxygen. Using a structured questionnaire, we explored the usefulness of the new strategy and health status changes among patients before and after the study period. Results: Among 29 participants, the mean age was 69.6 years, and 62.1% were male. At the end of the study, the proportion of patients with severe dyspnea [modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) grade 4] decreased from 62.1% to 41.4%. The mean COPD assessment test score improved from 30.3 to 24.7, and 68.9% of patients scored above the minimum clinically important difference. The mean time and amount of ambulatory oxygen administration changed significantly by the end of the study. More than three-quarters of patients were satisfied with the educational material and oxygen note. Conclusions: We showed that the new home oxygen service strategy improved the health status of COPD patients. Larger-scale and longer-term research to validate these results is warranted.

Development and validation of the COugh Assessment Test (COAT).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: A cough-specific quality-of-life questionnaire is recommended to assess the impact of cough; however, a simple instrument to quantify cough is required for everyday clinical practice. This study was aimed to develop a short patient-completed questionnaire (COugh Assessment Test, COAT). METHODS: The COAT was developed and validated by comparison with the Korean version of Leicester Cough Questionnaire (K-LCQ) and cough numeric rating scale (NRS, 0-10, 11-point scale) for chronic cough patients. RESULTS: Item selection identified five items regarding cough frequency, daily activity, sleep disturbance, fatigue and cough hypersensitivity (0-4 scaling of items, 0-20 score range) through reliability test cohort (n = 78). Test-retest reliability was strong (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.88). The final COAT was compared with K-LCQ and cough NRS in a validation cohort (n = 323). In Rasch analysis, COAT fitted well to a unidimensional model. Pearson correlations of COAT versus K-LCQ (i) before treatment, (ii) after treatment; COAT versus cough NRS (iii) before treatment, (iv) after treatment; (v) delta-COAT versus delta-cough NRS, (vi) delta-COAT versus delta-K-LCQ were (i) -0.71, (ii) -0.81, (iii) 0.69, (iv) 0.82, (v) -0.66 and (vi) 0.72, respectively. CONCLUSION: The COAT is a useful, simple questionnaire for assessing and monitoring cough.

Impact of BMI on exacerbation and medical care expenses in subjects with mild to moderate airflow obstruction.

Background and objective: The rate of obesity is increasing in Asia, but the clinical impact of body mass index (BMI) on the outcome of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains unknown. We aimed to assess this impact while focusing on the risk of exacerbation, health-care utilization, and medical costs. Methods: We examined 43,864 subjects registered in the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) database from 2007 to 2012, and linked the data of COPD patients who had mild to moderate airflow obstruction (n = 1,320) to National Health Insurance (NHI) data. COPD was confirmed by spirometry. BMI was used to stratify patients into four categories: underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m2), normal range (18.5-22.9 kg/m2), overweight (23-24.9 kg/m2), and obese (≥25 kg/m2). Results: Of the 1,320 patients with COPD with mild to moderate airflow obstruction, 27.8% had a BMI ≥25 kg/m2. Compared with normal-weight patients, obese patients tended to experience fewer exacerbations (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.88; 95% CI 0.77-0.99; P = 0.04), although this association was not significant in a multivariable analysis. COPD-related health-care utilization and medical expenses were higher among underweight patients than the other groups. After adjustment, the risk of COPD-related hospitalization was highest among underweight and higher among overweight patients vs normal-weight patients (adjusted IRRs: 7.12, 1.00, 1.26, and 1.02 for underweight, normal, overweight, and obese groups, respectively; P = 0.01). Conclusion: Decreased weight tends to negatively influence prognosis of COPD with mild to moderate airflow obstruction, whereas higher BMI was not significantly related to worse outcomes.

Heterogeneity of asthma and COPD overlap.

BACKGROUND: Asthma and COPD are heterogeneous diseases. Patients with both disease features (asthma-COPD overlap [ACO]) are common. However, clinical characteristics and socio-economic burden of ACO are still controversial. The aim of this study was to identify the heterogeneity of ACO and to find out the subtypes with clinical impact among ACO subtypes. METHODS: In the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) conducted between 2007 and 2012, subjects who were ≥40 years and had prebronchodilator FEV1/FVC <0.7 and FEV1 ≥50% predicted were included. The presence or absence of self-reported wheezing was indicated by W+ or W- and used as an index of airway hyper-responsiveness. S+/S- was defined as subjects who were smokers/never smokers. The subjects were divided into the following four groups: W-S-, W-S+, W+S-, and W+S+. W+S- and W+S+ were asthma-predominant ACO and COPD-predominant ACO, respectively. KNHANES and linked National Health Insurance data were analyzed. RESULTS: The asthma-predominant ACO group showed the lowest socioeconomic status, FEV1, FVC% predicted, and quality of life (QoL) levels. The COPD-predominant ACO group showed the highest hospitalization rate, outpatient medical cost, and total and outpatient health care utilization. COPD-predominant ACO was associated with exacerbations compared to the W-S- group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-2.85; P=0.015) and W-S+ group (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.43-3.10; P<0.001). COPD-predominant ACO was associated with increased medical cost. CONCLUSION: Asthma-predominant ACO individuals displayed poorer socioeconomic status and QoL compared to the COPD-predominant ACO group. The COPD-predominant ACO group displayed more frequent exacerbations and greater medical costs. Considering the heterogeneity of ACO, it is desirable to identify subtypes of ACO patients and appropriately allocate limited medical resources.