Magnetic resonance elastography as a preoperative assessment for predicting intrahepatic recurrence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is a noninvasive tool for diagnosing hepatic fibrosis with high accuracy. We investigated the preoperative clinical and imaging predictors of intrahepatic recurrence after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and evaluated MRE as a predictor of intrahepatic recurrence. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 80 patients who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with two-dimensional MRE and curative resection for treatment-naïve HCC between May 2019 and December 2021. Liver stiffness (LS) was measured on the elastograms, and the optimal cutoff of LS for predicting intrahepatic recurrence was obtained using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. An LS above this cutoff was defined as MRE-recurrence. Preoperative imaging features of the tumor were assessed on MRI, including features in the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System and microvascular invasion (MVI). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences were compared using the log-rank test. Using a Cox proportional hazards model, we conducted a multivariable analysis to investigate the factors affecting recurrence-free survival. RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 32 months (range, 4-52 months), thirteen patients (16.3%) developed intrahepatic recurrence. ROC analysis determined an LS cutoff of ≥4.35 kPa to define MRE-recurrence. The 4-year RFS rate was significantly higher in patients without MRE-recurrence than in those with MRE-recurrence (93.4% vs. 48.9%; p = 0.001). In multivariable analysis, MRE-recurrence (Hazard ratio [HR], 5.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-23.1) and MVI (HR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.0-11.3) were independent predictors of intrahepatic recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Patients without MRE-recurrence had significantly higher RFS rates than those with MRE-recurrence. MRE-recurrence and MVI were independent predictors of intrahepatic recurrence in patients after curative resection for HCC.

Assessment of factors affecting washout appearance of hepatocellular carcinoma on CT.

OBJECTIVES: To identify independent imaging and histopathologic factors that affect washout appearance of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in CT images. METHODS: This retrospective study included 264 patients who had undergone surgical resection for treatment-naïve single HCC between January 2014 and December 2015 and had available preoperative multiphasic CT images. Two reviewers evaluated the CT imaging features of HCC using LI-RADS v2018. The "washout" was visually assessed in portal venous or equilibrium phases. Depending on the presence of washout appearance of HCC, all patients were divided into "washout" (n = 228) and "no washout" (n = 36) groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with the absence of washout appearance of HCC. RESULTS: A total of 264 HCCs (median size, 2.6 cm) were analyzed. Histologically proven hepatic steatosis (macrovesicular steatosis ≥ 5%) (odds ratio [OR], 2.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-6.74; p = 0.040), tumor capsule on histopathology (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.06-0.50; p = 0.001), and mosaic appearance on CT image (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.14-0.85; p = 0.021) were independent factors associated with the absence of washout appearance of HCC. In 189 patients with available unenhanced CT images, CT-diagnosed hepatic steatosis was also an independent factor for the absence of washout appearance of HCC (OR, 9.26; 95% CI, 3.06-28.02; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Washout appearance of HCC in CT images could be obscured in both histologically proven hepatic steatosis and CT-diagnosed hepatic steatosis, and could be enhanced with tumor capsule on histopathology and mosaic appearance on CT image. KEY POINTS: • Hepatic steatosis is an independent factor related to the absence of washout appearance of hepatocellular carcinoma in CT images, in both histologically proven hepatic steatosis and CT-diagnosed hepatic steatosis. • Both histologically proven hepatic steatosis and CT-diagnosed hepatic steatosis have higher odds of absence of washout appearance of hepatocellular carcinoma compared to non-steatotic liver. • Tumor capsule on histopathology and mosaic appearance on CT image are independent factors that enhance the probability that washout appearance of hepatocellular carcinoma is visible.

Preoperative Prediction for Early Recurrence Can Be as Accurate as Postoperative Assessment in Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of predicting early recurrence using preoperative factors only in comparison with using both pre-/postoperative factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 549 patients who had undergone curative resection for single hepatcellular carcinoma (HCC) within Milan criteria. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify pre-/postoperative high-risk factors of early recurrence after hepatic resection for HCC. Two prediction models for early HCC recurrence determined by stepwise variable selection methods based on Akaike information criterion were built, either based on preoperative factors alone or both pre-/postoperative factors. Area under the curve (AUC) for each receiver operating characteristic curve of the two models was calculated, and the two curves were compared for non-inferiority testing. The predictive models of early HCC recurrence were internally validated by bootstrap resampling method. RESULTS: Multivariable analysis on preoperative factors alone identified aspartate aminotransferase/platelet ratio index (OR, 1.632; 95% CI, 1.056-2.522; p = 0.027), tumor size (OR, 1.025; 95% CI, 0.002-1.049; p = 0.031), arterial rim enhancement of the tumor (OR, 2.350; 95% CI, 1.297-4.260; p = 0.005), and presence of nonhypervascular hepatobiliary hypointense nodules (OR, 1.983; 95% CI, 1.049-3.750; p = 0.035) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as significant factors. After adding postoperative histopathologic factors, presence of microvascular invasion (OR, 1.868; 95% CI, 1.155-3.022; p = 0.011) became an additional significant factor, while tumor size became insignificant (p = 0.119). Comparison of the AUCs of the two models showed that the prediction model built on preoperative factors alone was not inferior to that including both pre-/postoperative factors {AUC for preoperative factors only, 0.673 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.623-0.723) vs. AUC after adding postoperative factors, 0.691 (95% CI, 0.639-0.744); p = 0.0013}. Bootstrap resampling method showed that both the models were valid. CONCLUSION: Risk stratification solely based on preoperative imaging and laboratory factors was not inferior to that based on postoperative histopathologic risk factors in predicting early recurrence after curative resection in within Milan criteria single HCC patients.

Detection of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after surgical resection: Non-contrast liver MR imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging versus gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging.

OBJECTIVE:: To compare the diagnostic performance of non-contrast liver MRI to whole MRI using gadoxetic acid for detection of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatectomy. METHODS:: This retrospective study analyzed 483 patients who underwent surveillance with liver MRI after hepatectomy for HCC (median time interval, 7.7 months). Non-contrast MRI set (T1- and T2 weighted and diffusion-weighted images) and whole MRI set (gadoxetic acid-enhanced and non-contrast MRI) were analyzed independently by two observers. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used (with the observers' individual observations and consensus) to detect recurrent HCC. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated. RESULTS:: A total of 113 patients had 197 recurrent HCCs on first follow-up MRI. Although non-contrast MRI had fairly high sensitivity for recurrent HCC, there were significant differences in sensitivity (94.7% vs 99.1%, p = 0.025) and accuracy (97.5% vs 99.2%, p = 0.021) between the two image sets (per-patients base analysis). However, in patients followed for ≥1 year after surgery, the diagnostic performance of non-contrast MRI and whole MRI were not significantly different (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION:: Non-contrast MRI may serve as an alternative follow-up method which can potentially replace whole MRI at least in selected patients followed up ≥1 year after surgery who have relatively lower risk of HCC recurrence. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:: There is no consensus regarding the ideal imaging modality or follow-up interval after resection of HCC. Non-contrast MRI had comparable performance to that of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in the detection of HCC recurrence during surveillance ≥1 year after surgery.

Missed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Assessment of early imaging findings on prediagnostic magnetic resonance imaging.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the early imaging findings and growth rate of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and to assess whether MR imaging detects early PDAC better than CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this retrospective study and waived the requirement for informed consent. Twenty-two patients were included, and two radiologists, by consensus, assessed the presence of focal lesions, interruption of the main pancreatic duct (MPD), MPD dilatation, and pancreatitis, volume doubling time (VDT) of PDAC on prediagnostic MR imaging. Two other observers independently reviewed three image sets (CT images, unenhanced MR images, and unenhanced and contrast-enhanced MR images) for the detection of early PDAC. Paired Wilcoxon signed rank test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: In 20 (90.9%) patients, prediagnostic MR exams showed abnormality, and all of them showed focal lesions on the first abnormal prediagnostic MR exams. Thirteen lesions (65%) showed no MPD interruption and one lesion (5%) was accompanied by pancreatitis. The mean VDT of PDAC was 151.7 days (range, 18.3-417.8 days). Diagnostic performance of unenhanced MR images (Az, 0.971-0.989) and combined unenhanced and contrast-enhanced MR images (Az, 0.956-0.963) was significantly better than that of CT images (Az, 0.565-0.583; p<0.01) for both observers, CONCLUSION: The most common early imaging finding of PDAC on prediagnostic MR exams was a focal lesion with no MPD interruption with a mean volume doubling time of five months. MR imaging was superior to CT for the detection of early PDAC.