Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Diabetes Complications ; 31(11): 1587-1591, 2017 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28888425

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Epidemiological data on genitourinary infections (GUIs) comparing patients with and without type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is scant. We aimed to estimate the incidence of urinary tract infections (UTIs), genital infections (GIs), or any GUI in total and stratified by history of GUI and sex. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We identified 39,295 patients in the Kaiser Permanente Northwest health plan with T2DM and an equal number of age and sex matched patients without diabetes. The cohort was followed for up to 9years (2006-2014). We calculated incidence rates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) of any GUI, UTIs and GIs adjusting for age, sex, race, BMI, presence of chronic kidney disease, annual number of outpatient visits, and diuretic use. RESULTS: Adjusted incidence of any GUI was 97.2/1000person-years (p-y) (95% CI 95.5-98.8) among the T2DM cohort vs. 79.7/1000 p-y (78.3-81.2) among those without diabetes. T2DM was associated with an adjusted 25% increased risk of UTI (rate ratio 1.25, 95% CI 1.22-1.29), a 26% increased risk of GI (1.26, 1.22-1.31) and a 22% increased risk of any GUI (1.22, 1.19-1.25). Incidence rates were lower among those with no GUI history, but the relative risks were similar. Women in both groups had higher incidence rates of GUIs than men. CONCLUSIONS: T2DM was associated with increased risks of any GUI, UTIs and GIs. Incidence rates of UTIs were higher than rates of GIs, but the relative risk of GIs was essentially identical. A similar pattern was observed when stratifying by sex. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY: RESEARCH QUESTIONS.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Infecções do Sistema Genital/complicações , Infecções Urinárias/complicações , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/microbiologia , Nefropatias Diabéticas/complicações , Nefropatias Diabéticas/epidemiologia , Nefropatias Diabéticas/microbiologia , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oregon/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Recidiva , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/complicações , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/microbiologia , Infecções do Sistema Genital/epidemiologia , Infecções do Sistema Genital/microbiologia , Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia , Washington/epidemiologia
2.
Am J Cardiol ; 119(3): 410-415, 2017 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27890243

RESUMO

High triglyceride (TG) levels among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) are associated with higher medical costs. We analyzed the economic impact of TG-lowering therapies and whether the association between medical costs and therapy differed according to TG reduction. We conducted an observational cohort study of 184,932 patients with diabetes mellitus who had a TG measurement between January 2012 and June 2013 and a second TG measurement 3 to 15 months later. We identified 4 therapy groups (statin monotherapy, TG-specific monotherapy, statin/TG-specific combination therapy, or no therapy) and stratified those groups by percent change in TG (increased ≥5%, change of ≤4.9%, decreased 5% to 29%, decreased ≥30%). We compared change in medical costs between the year before and after therapy, adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics. Of the 184,932 total patients, 143,549 (77.6%) received statin monotherapy, 900 (0.5%) received TG-specific monotherapy, 1,956 (1.1%) received statin and TG-specific combination therapy, and 38,527 (20.8%) received no prescription lipid agents. After covariate adjustment, statin/TG-specific agent recipients had a mean 1-year total cost reduction of $1,110. The greatest cost reduction was seen among statin/TG-specific combination therapy patients who reduced TG levels by ≥30% (-$2,859). Statin monotherapy patients who reduced TG by ≥30% also had a large reduction in adjusted costs (-$1,079). In conclusion, we found a substantial economic benefit to treating diabetic patients with statin/TG-specific combination lipid therapy compared with monotherapy of either type or no lipid pharmacotherapy. A TG reduction of ≥30% produced a particularly large reduction in 1-year medical costs.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Hipercolesterolemia/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertrigliceridemia/tratamento farmacológico , Hipolipemiantes/uso terapêutico , Idoso , HDL-Colesterol/sangue , LDL-Colesterol/sangue , Estudos de Coortes , Análise Custo-Benefício , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economia , Quimioterapia Combinada , Ácidos Graxos Ômega-3/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Ácidos Fíbricos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Hipercolesterolemia/complicações , Hipercolesterolemia/economia , Hipertrigliceridemia/complicações , Hipertrigliceridemia/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Niacina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Triglicerídeos/sangue
3.
Diabetes Care ; 39(11): 1981-1986, 2016 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27561921

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Weight loss is recommended for overweight patients with diabetes but avoidance of weight gain may be a more realistic goal. We calculated the 4-year economic impact of maintaining body weight versus gaining weight. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Among 8,154 patients with type 2 diabetes, we calculated weight change as the difference between the first body weight measure in 2010 and the last measure in 2013 and calculated mean glycated hemoglobin (A1C) from all measurements from 2010 to 2013. We created four analysis groups: weight change <5% and A1C <7%; weight gain ≥5% and A1C <7%; weight change <5% and A1C ≥7%; and weight gain ≥5% and A1C ≥7%. We compared change in medical costs between 2010 and 2013, adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Patients who maintained weight within 5% of baseline experienced a reduction in costs of about $400 regardless of A1C. In contrast, patients who gained ≥5% of baseline weight and had mean A1C ≥7% had an increase in costs of $1,473 (P < 0.001). Those who gained >5% of their baseline weight with mean A1C <7% had a modest increase in costs ($387, NS). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who gained at least 5% of their baseline body weight and did not maintain A1C <7% over 4 years experienced a 14% increase in medical costs, whereas those who maintained good glycemic control had a mean cost increase of 3.3%. However, patients who maintained weight within 5% of baseline had costs that were ∼5% lower than baseline. Avoidance of weight gain may reduce costs in the long-term.


Assuntos
Manutenção do Peso Corporal , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Aumento de Peso , Adulto , Idoso , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/metabolismo , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tamanho da Amostra , Redução de Peso
4.
J Diabetes Complications ; 28(1): 10-6, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24211091

RESUMO

AIMS: To estimate the rate of progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and calculate medical costs associated with progression. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 25,576 members at Kaiser Permanente who had T2D and at least one serum creatinine measurement in 2005. Using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), we assigned patients to baseline stages of kidney function (stage 0-2, >60ml/min/1.73m(2), n=21,008; stage 3, 30-59, n=3,885; stage 4, 15-29, n=683). We examined all subsequent eGFRs through 2010 to assess progression of kidney disease. Medical costs at baseline and incremental costs during follow-up were assessed. RESULTS: Mean age of patients was 60.6years, 51% were men, and mean diabetes duration was 5.3years. At baseline, 17.9% of patients with T2D also had stage 3 or 4 CKD. Incremental adjusted costs that occurred over follow-up (from baseline) was on average $4569, $12,617, and $33,162 per patient per year higher among patients who progressed from baseline stage 0-2, stage 3, and stage 4 CKD, respectively, compared to those who did not progress. Across all stages of CKD, those who progressed to a higher stage of CKD from baseline had follow-up costs that ranged from 2 to 4 times higher than those who did not progress. CONCLUSIONS: Progression of CKD in T2D drives substantial medical care costs. Interventions designed to minimize decline in progressive kidney function, particularly among patients with stage 3 or 4 CKD, may reduce the economic burden of CKD in T2D.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/economia , Idoso , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
5.
Prev Med ; 34(1): 40-50, 2002 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11749095

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Regular screening has the potential to reduce breast and cervical cancer mortality, but despite health plan programs to encourage screening, many women remain unscreened. Tailored communications have been identified as a promising approach to promote mammography and Pap test screening. METHODS: The study used a four-group randomized design to compare with Usual Care the separate and combined effects of two tailored, motivational interventions to increase screening-a clinical office In-reach intervention and a sequential letter/telephone Outreach intervention. Subjects were 510 female HMO members ages 52-69 who had had no mammogram in the past 2 years and no Pap smear in the past 3 years. Primary outcomes were the percentage of women in each condition who received a mammogram, a Pap smear, or both screening tests during the 14-month study period. RESULTS: Thirty-two percent of the Combined group, 39% of the Outreach group, and 26% of the In-reach group obtained both services versus 19% of Usual Care participants. Overall, compared with Usual Care, both Outreach (P = 0.006) and Combined (P = 0.05) screened significantly more women. For subjects ages 65-69, Outreach rates were lower than those of Usual Care. CONCLUSION: A tailored letter-telephone Outreach appears to be more effective at screening women ages 52-64 than a tailored office-based intervention, in large part because most In-reach women did not have clinic visits at which to receive the intervention.


Assuntos
Sistemas Pré-Pagos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Mamografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Teste de Papanicolaou , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas de Alerta , Esfregaço Vaginal/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde da Mulher , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/prevenção & controle , Relações Comunidade-Instituição , Coleta de Dados , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oregon , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Washington
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA