Integration of fall prevention into state policy in Connecticut.

PURPOSE OF STUDY: To describe the ongoing efforts of the Connecticut Collaboration for Fall Prevention (CCFP) to move evidence regarding fall prevention into clinical practice and state policy. METHODS: A university-based team developed methods of networking with existing statewide organizations to influence clinical practice and state policy. RESULTS: We describe steps taken that led to funding and legislation of fall prevention efforts in the state of Connecticut. We summarize CCFP's direct outreach by tabulating the educational sessions delivered and the numbers and types of clinical care providers that were trained. Community organizations that had sustained clinical practices incorporating evidence-based fall prevention were subsequently funded through mini-grants to develop innovative interventional activities. These mini-grants targeted specific subpopulations of older persons at high risk for falls. IMPLICATIONS: Building collaborative relationships with existing stakeholders and care providers throughout the state, CCFP continues to facilitate the integration of evidence-based fall prevention into clinical practice and state-funded policy using strategies that may be useful to others.

Perceptions of physicians on the barriers and facilitators to integrating fall risk evaluation and management into practice.

BACKGROUND: Falls are common, treatable, and result in considerable morbidity in older adults. However, fall risk factor evaluation and management targeted at high-risk patients is largely neglected in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of fall risk management by primary care providers. DESIGN: Qualitative study using a semi-structured interview. PARTICIPANTS: Primary care providers who received an academic outreach visit. APPROACH: Self-reported facilitators and barriers to evaluating and managing fall risk in older patients. RESULTS: Physician factors, logistical factors, and patient factors intersect to either facilitate or impede fall risk evaluation and management by primary care providers. Physician factors include awareness, competing risks, appropriateness of referrals, training, and tie-in to familiar activities. Logistical factors include availability of transportation, time requirements of immobile patients, reimbursement, scheduling, family involvement, and utilization of other health care providers. Physicians' perceptions of patient factors include reporting, attitudes toward medication, and positive feedback. CONCLUSION: Strategies to improve the adoption of fall risk evaluation and management in primary care should address the specific physician, logistical, and patient barriers perceived by physicians who had received an informative, motivational intervention to assess and manage falls among their patients.

Dissemination of an evidence-based multicomponent fall risk-assessment and -management strategy throughout a geographic area.

OBJECTIVES: To report on the penetration of, and identified barriers to and facilitators of, efforts to incorporate evidence-based fall risk assessment and management into clinical practice throughout a defined geographic area. DESIGN: Dissemination project. SETTING: North central Connecticut. PARTICIPANTS: Hospitals, home care agencies, primary care providers, and outpatient rehabilitation facilities. INTERVENTION: Multiple professional behavior-change strategies were used to encourage providers to incorporate evidence-based fall assessment and management into their practices. MEASUREMENTS: Penetration of dissemination efforts over 36 months; barriers and facilitators identified by provider working groups during the first 2 years of the project. RESULTS: All seven hospitals and 26 home care agencies in the area, 119 of 130 rehabilitation facilities, and 138 of 212 primary care offices participated. Most provider working groups expressed similar barriers and facilitating factors. Reported barriers specific to fall risk management included lack of awareness of fall morbidity and preventability, perceived lack of expertise and Medicare coverage, inadequate referral patterns among providers, and lack of a federal mandate for physicians. Facilitating factors specific to falls included the opportunity to market new services and to develop new networks of professional relationships across disciplines and the Medicare mandate that home care agencies focus on functional outcomes. CONCLUSION: Dissemination efforts showed notable successes as well as challenges. Although many of the barriers were general to diffusing new practices, several were specific to fall assessment and management that span disciplines and sites. Project results have implications for efforts to diffuse evidence-based practices for multifactorial geriatric conditions such as falls.

Fall-risk assessment and management in clinical practice: views from healthcare providers.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent to which healthcare providers reportedly address evidence-based fall risk factors in older patients after exposure to an educational intervention and to determine barriers reportedly encountered when these healthcare providers intervene with or refer older patients with identified fall-risk factors. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using a structured interview. SETTING: Geographic area of Connecticut where the Connecticut Collaboration for Fall Prevention (CCFP) has been implemented. PARTICIPANTS: Emergency department (ED) physicians, hospital-based discharge planners or care coordinators (nurses or social workers), home health agency nurses, and office-based primary care physicians (total n=33) after exposure to the CCFP implementation team. MEASUREMENTS: Self-reported practices (direct intervention or referral) and barriers when addressing seven evidence-based risk factors for falls: gait and transfer impairments, balance disturbances, multiple medications, postural hypotension, sensory and perceptive deficits, foot and footwear problems, and environmental hazards. RESULTS: Respondents were most likely to report directly intervening with or referring older patients for gait and transfer impairments (85%) and balance disturbances (82%) and least likely to do so when encountering foot or footwear problems (58%) and sensory or perceptive deficits (61%). ED physicians reported lowest rates of direct intervention or referral for foot or footwear problems (20%), home health agency nurses for sensory or perceptive deficits (50%), and office-based primary care physicians for foot or footwear problems (50%). Patient compliance was the most commonly reported barrier to successful direct intervention across several risk factors, whereas inadequate availability of other healthcare providers and lack of Medicare reimbursement were the most commonly reported barriers to successful patient referrals. CONCLUSION: After exposure to the CCFP implementation team, the majority of healthcare providers reported directly intervening or referring patients when addressing all risk factors, but results pinpointed specific healthcare provider groups with room for improvement in assessment and management of specific risk factors. Patient education appears to be a necessary adjunct to healthcare provider training, because patient compliance was a reported barrier to optimal intervention by healthcare providers.