HCC screening with ultrasound: assessment of quality using ultrasound LI-RADS score.

PURPOSE: To describe ultrasound (US) quality for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening/surveillance using the US LI-RADS scoring system, and to assess predictive factors of worse US quality scores. METHODS: This retrospective study included adult patients (n = 470; M/F 264/206, median age 59y) at risk for HCC that underwent US for HCC screening/surveillance. US examinations were independently reviewed by 2 radiologists that assigned a visualization score (A: no/minimal, B: moderate, C: severe limitation) and US diagnostic category (US LI-RADS 1: negative, US LI-RADS 2: subthreshold, US LI-RADS 3: positive) to each study. A generalized linear mixed model was used to assess the predictive factors of worse visualization score using OR (odds ratio) statistics. Simple Kappa coefficient (K) assessed inter-reader agreement. RESULTS: For readers 1 and 2, 295/320 (62.8%/68.1%) cases were scored A, 153/134 (32.6%/28.5%) were scored B, and 22/16 (4.6%/3.4%) were scored C, respectively. There was moderate inter-reader agreement for US LI-RADS visualization score (K = 0.478) and 100% concordance for US diagnostic category (K = 1), with 30 (6.4%) cases scored as positive (US LI-RADS 3). Cirrhosis and obesity were significant independent predictors of worse visualization scores (B/C) (cirrhosis: OR 10.4 confidence intervals: [4.25-25.48], p < 0.001; obesity: OR 3.61 [2.11-6.20], p < 0.001). Of the 30 lesions scored as US LI-RADS 3, 9 were characterized as probable or definite HCC on confirmatory CT/MRI, yielding a PPV of 30% (9/30) and a false-positive rate of 70% (21/30). CONCLUSION: Moderate to severe limitations in quality of US performed for HCC screening/surveillance was observed in approximately one-third of patients. Patients with cirrhosis and/or elevated BMI have poorer quality US studies and may benefit from other screening modalities such as CT or MRI.

Response assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma treated with yttrium-90 radioembolization: inter-reader variability, comparison with 3D quantitative approach, and role in the prediction of clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the inter-reader variability in response assessment for HCC treated with radioembolization (TARE) compared with 3D quantitative criteria (qEASL); and to evaluate their role in prediction of pathological necrosis and clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 57 patients with 77 HCCs who underwent TARE were included. Five radiologists recorded multiple imaging features and assigned mRECIST/LIRADS Treatment Response (TR) categories on post-treatment MRI at 4-6 weeks and 6-9 months after TARE. qEASL categories were assigned by a separate reader. Inter-reader variability between LIRADS TR/mRECIST/qEASL were evaluated and hazards regression was used in predicting clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Inter-reader agreement was fair for mRECIST (K = 0.43 and 0.34 at first and second follow-up respectively); moderate for LIRADS TR (K = 0.48 and 0.53 at first and second follow-up respectively). Inter-criterion agreement was moderate to substantial (r = 0.41-0.65 and r = 0.54-0.60 at first and second follow-up) for mRECIST-qEASL. LIRADS TR correlated well with qEASL for all readers at both follow-ups (K = 0.45-0.78; K = 0.39-0.77 for first and second follow-up). qEASL was the most accurate in predicting Tumor-Free Survival (TFS) on first (HR 2.23 [1.44-3.46], p < 0.001) and second (HR 1.69 [1.15-2.48], p = 0.008) follow-up. LIRADS TR was the most accurate in predicting histopathological necrosis (8 patients underwent liver transplantation and 1 patient underwent tumor resection during the period of the study). CONCLUSIONS: HCC response assessment following TARE is challenging, resulting in poor to moderate inter-reader agreement for mRECIST, and moderate inter-reader agreement for LIRADS TR response assessment criteria. qEASL outperformed mRECIST criteria for early identification of responders and predicting TFS, suggesting an advantage in volumetric tumor response assessment. LIRADS TR outperformed other criteria in predicting pathological necrosis.

Outcomes assessment in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using qualitative and quantitative imaging features.

BACKGROUND: To assess the performance of imaging features, including radiomics texture features, in predicting histopathologic tumor grade, AJCC stage, and outcomes [time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS)] in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). METHODS: Seventy-three patients (26 M/47F, mean age 63y) with pre-operative imaging (CT, n = 37; MRI, n = 21; CT and MRI, n = 15] within 6 months of resection were included in this retrospective study. Qualitative imaging traits were assessed by 2 observers. A 3rd observer measured tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), enhancement ratios (ERs), and Haralick texture features. Blood biomarkers and imaging features were compared with histopathology (tumor grade and AJCC stage) and outcomes (TTR and OS) using log-rank, generalized Wilcoxon, Cox proportional hazards regression, and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: Median TTR and OS were 53.9 and 79.7 months. ICC recurred in 64.4% (47/73) of patients and 46.6% (34/73) of patients died. There was fair accuracy for some qualitative imaging features in the prediction of worse tumor grade (maximal AUC of 0.68 for biliary obstruction on MRI, p = 0.032, observer 1) and higher AJCC stage (maximal AUC of 0.73 for biliary obstruction on CT, p = 0.002, observer 2; and AUC of 0.73 for vascular involvement on MRI, p = 0.01, observer 2). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that CA 19-9 [hazard ratio (HR) 2.44/95% confidence interval (CI) 1.31-4.57/p = 0.005)] and tumor size on imaging (HR 1.13/95% CI 1.04-1.22/p = 0.003) were significant predictors of TTR, while CA 19-9 (HR 4.08/95% CI 1.75-9.56, p = 0.001) and presence of metastatic lymph nodes at histopathology (HR 2.86/95% CI 1.35-6.07/p = 0.006) were significant predictors of OS. On multivariable analysis, satellite lesions on CT (HR 2.79/95%CI 1.01-7.15/p = 0.032, observer 2), vascular involvement on MRI (HR 0.10/95% CI 0.01-0.85/p = 0.032, observer 1), and texture feature MRI variance (HR 0.55/95% CI 0.31-0.97, p = 0.040) predicted TTR once adjusted for the independent predictors CA 19-9 and tumor size on imaging. Several qualitative and quantitative features demonstrated associations with TTR, OS, and AJCC stage at univariable analysis (range: HR 0.35-19; p < 0.001-0.045), however none were predictive of OS at multivariable analysis when adjusted for CA 19-9 and metastatic lymph nodes (p > 0.088). CONCLUSIONS: There was reasonable accuracy in predicting tumor grade and higher AJCC stage in ICC utilizing certain qualitative and quantitative imaging traits. Serum CA 19-9, tumor size, presence of metastatic lymph nodes, and qualitative imaging traits of satellite lesions and vascular involvement are predictors of patient outcomes, along with a promising predictive ability of certain quantitative texture features.

Feasibility and reproducibility of liver surface nodularity quantification for the assessment of liver cirrhosis using CT and MRI.

PURPOSE: To assess intra-observer, inter-observer and inter-modality (CT vs. MRI) reproducibility of liver surface nodularity (LSN) scores measured with software used for detection of liver fibrosis. METHODS: This IRB-approved retrospective study included patients with both abdominal CT and MRI within 6 months of histopathologic sampling. Two independent observers used post-processing software to quantify LSN scores on axial non-contrast CT (NCT), axial contrast-enhanced CT (CECT), axial T2-weighted (T2W) HASTE, and axial and coronal post-gadoxetic acid T1-weighted (T1W) images obtained during the hepatobiliary phase (HBP). Ten slices were used to acquire the LSN scores. Intra-observer, inter-observer, and inter-modality (CT vs. MRI) reproducibility were assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficients of variability (CV). Accuracy for detection of cirrhosis was evaluated for each technique. RESULTS: 26 patients (M/F 19/7, mean age 57 years), including 7 with cirrhosis (26.9%), were assessed. Technical failure occurred with NCT (1/23, 4.3%) and T2 HASTE (8/28, 28.6%). Intra-observer reproducibility was excellent for NCT, CECT, axial and coronal T1W HBP [ICC ≥ 0.92, CV ≤ 8%]. Inter-observer reproducibility was also excellent for NCT and CECT (ICC ≥ 0.95, CV ≤ 7.3%) and for coronal T1W HBP (ICC = 0.84, CV = 5.6%). There was fair to moderate agreement between CT and MRI (ICC 0.20-0.44). There were significant differences in mean LSN scores between non-cirrhotic and cirrhotic patients with NCT (2.6 vs. 4.2, p = 0.04) and T1W HBP (3.7 vs. 4.6; p = 0.01) images, with AUCs of 0.81 and 0.82, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: LSN measurement is highly reproducible with NCT and post-contrast T1W HBP on MRI, with different results obtained between CT and MRI.