A Cross-National Comparison of Biosimilars Pricing in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, and Italy.

BACKGROUND: Biosimilar medicines are defined as biological products highly similar to an already licensed biological product (RP). The market entry of biosimilars is expected to reduce the costs of biological treatments. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the range of differences between the prices of biosimilars and the corresponding RP for biologicals approved in four countries. METHOD: This is a cross-national comparison of pricing of biosimilars in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, and Italy. The study examined online price databases provided by the national authorities of the investigated countries. Biosimilar price difference was calculated by subtracting the unit price of the biosimilar by the unit price of the RP, and then dividing it by the unit price of the RP. The results were presented as percentage. RESULTS: Brazil had the highest median price reduction (- 36.3%) in biosimilars price, followed by Italy (- 20.0%) and Argentina (- 18.6%). All the biosimilars in Italy were priced below the RP presenting a minimum reduction of 6.3%, while in Australia, most of the prices of biosimilars were equal to the RP. In Argentina, one infliximab-biosimilar displayed price above the RP (40.7%) while the lower priced brand had a reduction of 14.4%. Brazil had four biosimilars with prices above the respective RP, including isophane insulin (1), insulin glargine (1) and somatropin (2). CONCLUSION: The study revealed a marked dispersion in the price's differences between biosimilars and RP across the studied countries. Governments should evaluate whether their policies have been successful in improving affordability of biological therapies.

Methodology of the brodalumab assessment of hazards: a multicentre observational safety (BRAHMS) study.

INTRODUCTION: Safe and effective pharmacological treatment is of paramount importance for treating severe psoriasis. Brodalumab, a monoclonal antibody against interleukin (IL) 17 receptor A, was granted marketing authorisation in the EU in 2017. The European Medicines Agency requested a postauthorisation safety study of brodalumab to address potential safety issues raised during drug development regarding major adverse cardiovascular events, suicidal conduct, cancer and serious infections. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: BRodalumab Assessment of Hazards: A Multinational Safety is a multicentre observational safety study of brodalumab running from 2017 to 2029 using population-based healthcare databases from Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Netherlands, Germany and three different centres in Italy. A distributed database network approach is used, such that only aggregate data are exchanged between sites.Two types of designs are used: a case-time-control design to study acute effects of transient treatment and a variation of the new user active comparator design to study the effects of transient or chronic treatment. As comparators, inhibitors of TNF-α, inhibitors of IL-12 and IL-23, and other inhibitors of cytokine IL-17A are included.In the self-controlled case-time-control design, the risk of developing the outcome of interest during periods of brodalumab use is compared within individuals to the risk in periods without use.In the active comparator cohort design, new users of brodalumab are identified and matched to new users of active comparators. Potential baseline confounders are adjusted for by using propensity score modelling. For outcomes that potentially require large cumulative exposure, an adapted active comparator design has been developed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by relevant authorities in Denmark, Norway, Sweden, the Netherlands, Germany and Italy in line with the relevant legislation at each site. Data confidentiality is secured by the distributed network approach. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EUPAS30280.

Determinants of first-line biological treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Results from an observational study.

ABSTRACT: Guidelines for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) recommend the use of conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cs-DMARDs) at the onset of the disease and only in the case of therapeutic failure, the addition of a biological drug (b-DMARD) is suggested.The study aimed to evaluate determinants for first-line biological treatment in patients with RA in clinical practice.A cohort of patients with RA, resident in Lazio, a central Italian Region, where Rome is located, and with at least one disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) prescription between 2010 and 2016 was selected using health information systems linkable with each other by an individual unique anonymous identifier. In particular RA cohort was defined retrieving all patients with at least a RA disease code in regional data claims (hospital discharge, exemption code, emergency department access, or therapeutic plan). Only new users were included and the first-line treatment was identified: cs-DMARD or b-DMARD.Descriptive analysis according to type of DMARD treatment was performed. Through multivariate logistic regression models (odds ratio [OR]; confidence interval [CI95%]) determinants of therapy such as age, comorbidity, and comedication were investigated.Finally, switching during the first year of treatment from cs-DAMARDs to b-DMARDs was analyzed.DMARD-new users with RA were 5641; 7.1% of them with b-DMARD as first-line treatment. Considering the year of dispensing, this percentage ranged from 4.9% (2011) to 8.2% (2015). Among cs-DMARD the most prescribed active agent was methotrexate (59.3%), while among b-DMARD it was etarnecept (37.0%), followed by adalimumab (21.2%). The average age of the cohort was 54 years with 77% of women. Determinants of first-line b-DMARD use were: age (OR<30vs>65 = 3.7; 2.6-5.2, OR[30-45)vs>65 = 1.7; 1.2-2.4, OR[45-55)vs>65 = 1.6; 1.1-2.4, OR[55-65)vs>65 = 1.2; 0.8-1.7), cancers (OR = 2.3; 1.3-4.2), cardio-cerebrovascular disease (OR = 1.4; 1.0-1.9), use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (OR = 0.6; 0.4-0.7) and corticosteroids (OR = 0.6; 0.5-0.7) in the 6 months preceding diagnosis.In the first year of treatment, we observed a percentage of switch from cs-DMARDs to b-DMARDs of 7.9%.In clinical practice, about 7% of patients with RA are prescribed with a b-DMARD as first-line treatment. This therapeutic option, even if not supported by guide lines, is mostly link to younger age and clinical profile of the patients.

Bortezomib-based therapy in non-transplant multiple myeloma patients: a retrospective cohort study from the FABIO project.

INTRODUCTION: Randomized clinical trials showed that bortezomib, in addition to conventional chemotherapy, improves survival and disease progression in multiple myeloma (MM) patients not eligible for stem cell transplantation. The aim of this retrospective population-based cohort study is the evaluation of both clinical and economic profile of bortezomib-based versus conventional chemotherapy in daily clinical practice. METHODS: Healthcare utilization databases of six Italian regions were used to identify adult patients with non-transplant MM, who started a first-line therapy with bortezomib-based or conventional chemotherapy. Patients were matched by propensity score and were followed from treatment start until death, lost to follow-up or study end-point. Overall survival (OS) and restricted mean survival time (RMST) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Association between first-line treatment and risk of death was estimated by a conditional Cox proportional regression model. Average mean cumulative costs were estimated and compared between groups. RESULTS: In the period 2010-2016, 3509 non-transplant MM patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 1157 treated with bortezomib-based therapy were matched to 1826 treated with conventional chemotherapy. Median OS and RMST were 33.9 and 27.9 months, and 42.9 and 38.4 months, respectively, in the two treatment arms. Overall, these values corresponded to a HR of death of 0.79 (95% CI 0.71-0.89) over a time horizon of 84 months. Average cumulative cost were 83,839 € and 54,499 €, respectively, corresponding to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 54,333 € per year of life gained, a cost coherent with the willingness-to-pay thresholds frequently adopted from Western countries. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggested that, in a large cohort of non-transplant MM patients treated outside the experimental setting, first-line treatment with bortezomib-based therapy was associated with a favourable effectiveness and cost-effectiveness profile.

Effectiveness and Costs Associated to Adding Cetuximab or Bevacizumab to Chemotherapy as Initial Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results from the Observational FABIO Project.

Evidence available on the effectiveness and costs of biological therapies for the initial treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is scarce and contrasting. We conducted a population-based cohort investigation for assessing overall survival and costs associated with their use in a real-world setting. Healthcare utilization databases were used to select patients newly diagnosed with mCRC between 2010 and 2016. Those initially treated with biological therapy (bevacizumab or cetuximab) added to chemotherapy were propensity-score-matched to those treated with standard chemotherapy alone, and were followed up to June 30th, 2018. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, restricted mean survival time (RMST) and cumulative costs were compared between the two treatment arms. The study cohort included 1896 mCRC patients treated with biological therapy matched to 5678 patients treated with chemotherapy alone. Median overall survival was 21.8 and 20.2 months, respectively. After 84 months of follow-up, RMSTs were 30.9 and 31.9 months (p = 0.193), indicating no differences between the average survival time between treatment arms. Patients treated with biological therapy were associated with higher costs. Cumulative per capita costs were €59,663 and €44,399, respectively. In our study, first-line biological therapy did not improve long-term overall survival and was associated with higher costs as compared to standard chemotherapy.

[Covid-19 and clinical-epidemiological research in Italy: proposal of a research agenda on priority topics by the Italian association of epidemiology]. / Covid-19 e ricerca clinico-epidemiologica in Italia: proposta di un'agenda di ricerca su temi prioritari da parte dell'Associazione italiana di epidemiologia.

BACKGROUND: the Covid-19 pandemic has provoked a huge of clinical and epidemiological research initiatives, especially in the most involved countries. However, this very large effort was characterized by several methodological weaknesses, both in the field of discovering effective treatments (with too many small and uncontrolled trials) and in the field of identifying preventable risks and prognostic factors (with too few large, representative and well-designed cohorts or case-control studies). OBJECTIVES: in response to the fragmented and uncoordinated research production on Covid-19, the   italian Association of Epidemiology (AIE) stimulated the formation of a working group (WG) with the aims of identifying the most important gaps in knowledge and to propose a structured research agenda of clinical and epidemiological studies considered at high priority on Covid-19, including recommendations on the preferable methodology. METHODS: the WG was composed by 25 subjects, mainly epidemiologists, statisticians, and other experts in specific fields, who have voluntarily agreed to the proposal. The agreement on a list of main research questions and on the structure of the specific documents to be produced were defined through few meetings and cycles of document exchanges. RESULTS: twelve main research questions on Covid-19 were identified, covering aetiology, prognosis, interventions, follow-up and impact on general and specific populations (children, pregnant women). For each of them, a two-page form was developed, structured in: background, main topics, methods (with recommendations on preferred study design and warnings for bias prevention) and an essential bibliography. CONCLUSIONS: this research agenda represents an initial contribution to direct clinical and epidemiological research efforts on high priority topics with a focus on methodological aspects. Further development and refinements of this agenda by Public Health Authorities are encouraged.

The Role of European Healthcare Databases for Post-Marketing Drug Effectiveness, Safety and Value Evaluation: Where Does Italy Stand?

Enormous progress has been made globally in the use of evidence derived from patients' clinical information as they access their routine medical care. The value of real-world data lies in their complementary nature compared with data from randomised controlled trials: less detailed information on drug efficacy but longer observational periods and larger, more heterogeneous study populations reflecting clinical practice because individuals are included who would not usually be recruited in trials. Real-world data can be collected in various types of electronic sources, such as electronic health records, claims databases and drug or disease registries. These data sources vary in nature from country to country, according to national healthcare system structures and national policies. In Italy, a growing number of healthcare databases have been used to evaluate post-marketing drug utilisation and safety in the last two decades. The aim of this narrative review is to describe the available Italian sources of real-world data and their contribution to generating post-marketing evidence on drug use and safety. We also discuss the strengths and limitations of the most commonly used Italian healthcare databases in addressing various research questions concerning drug utilisation, comparative effectiveness and safety studies, as well as health technology assessment and other areas.

Do Italian pregnant women use periconceptional folate supplementation?

INTRODUCTION: Deficiency of folic acid (FA) has been identified as a risk factor for neural tube defects (NTDs) as well as other congenital anomalies. Thus, periconceptional folate supplementation is recommended for all women planning to get pregnant. METHODS: We conducted a KAP (knowledge, attitude, practice) survey to investigate the use of FA and its appropriateness. The survey included a sample of 562 women who delivered in the Lazio region between 2013 and 2014. Two logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between the characteristics of participating women and both the information received on FA intake and its use. RESULTS: The prevalence of periconceptional FA assumption was 19.4% although 82.2% of the interviewed women had planned their pregnancies. CONCLUSIONS: It shows that more periconceptional counseling is needed to increase women's awareness on the opportunity of FA supplementation.

The impact of time-window bias on the assessment of the long-term effect of medication adherence: the case of secondary prevention after myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: Time-window bias was described in case-control studies and led to a biased estimate of drug effect. No studies have measured the impact of this bias on the assessment of the effect of medication adherence on health outcomes. Our goals were to estimate the association between adherence to drug therapies after myocardial infarction (MI) and the incidence of a new MI, and to quantify the error that would have been produced by a time-window bias. SETTING: This is a population-based study. Data were obtained from the Regional Health Information Systems of the Lazio Region in Central Italy (around 5 million inhabitants). PARTICIPANTS: Patients discharged after MI in 2006-2007 were enrolled in the cohort and followed through 2009. OUTCOME MEASURE: The study outcome was reinfarction: either mortality, or hospital admission for MI, whichever occurred first. DESIGN: A nested case-control study was performed. Controls were selected using both time-dependent and time-independent sampling. Adherence to antiplatelets, ß-blockers, ACE inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEI/ARBs) and statins was calculated using the proportion of days covered (PDC). RESULTS: A total of 6880 patients were enrolled in the cohort. Using time-dependent sampling, a protective effect was detected for all study drugs. Conversely, using time-independent sampling, the beneficial effect was attenuated, as in the case of antiplatelet agents and statins, or completely masked, as in the case of ACEI/ARBs and ß-blockers. For ACEI/ARBs, the time-dependent approach produced ORs of 0.83 (95% CI 0.57 to 1.21) and 0.72 (0.55 to 0.95), respectively, for '0.5 < PDC ≤ 0.75' and 'PDC>0.75' versus '0 ≤ PDC ≤ 0.5'. Using the time-independent approach, the ORs were 0.96 (0.65 to 1.43) and 1.00 (0.76 to 1.33), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A time-independent definition of a time-dependent exposure introduces a bias when the length of follow-up varies with the outcome. The persistence of time-related biases in peer-reviewed papers strongly suggests the need for increased awareness of this methodological pitfall.

[Socioeconomic position and appropriate antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: a population-based cohort study in Rome (Lazio Region, Central Italy)]. / Posizione socioeconomica e aderenza alla terapia antiaggregante post angioplastica coronarica: uno studio epidemiologico a Roma.

OBJECTIVES: to evaluate the association between socioeconomic position (SEP) and adherence to appropriate antiplatelet therapy (AAT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the year following the discharge. DESIGN: according to scientific guidelines, AAT for PCI patients consists of Clopidogrel for a minimum of 1 month and ideally up to 12 months after discharge, and with Acetylsalicylic Acid (ASA) indefinitely. For each patient, drug claims over a 1-year period after discharge were retrieved from Regional Drug Dispense Registry. Drug use was measured with Proportion of Days Covered (PDC). PDC was computed dividing the total number of dispensed Defined Daily Dose by each patient's follow-up time. Dual antiplatelet therapy with PDC ≥75% and single therapy based on Clopidogrel with PDC ≥75% were considered as AAT. We used a composite area-based index of socioeconomic position by census block of residence built using the 2001 census of Rome, assuming 5 levels (from 1 =High SEP to 5 =Low SEP). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: study population of 5,901 patients resident in Rome, who underwent their first PCI during 2006-2007 were selected from the Hospital Information System. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: proportions of patients treated with AAT by SEP was measured for the overall year and by semester. The association between SEP and adherence to AAT was estimated through logistic regression models adjusting for factors selected by a stepwise procedure (gender, age, comorbidities, discharged from cardiology or coronary care unit, new user of antiplatelet drugs). RESULTS: 76% of the study population were men, 96% were aged more than 44 years, and 63% belonged to medium-low SEP. In the 1-year follow-up, the proportion of patients adherent to appropriate antiplatelet therapy was 65%; SEP was associated with AAT (OR high vs. low SEP 1.26; 95%CI 1.05-1.51; p trend =0.002). CONCLUSIONS: during the year after discharge, adherence to AAT of PCI patients was unsatisfactory and it decreased overtime more in medium-low SEP patients than in high SEP patients. Strategies to improve adherence to AAT among patients who underwent PCI need to be identified taking into account the multifactorial nature of poor medication adherence, and in particular patients' socioeconomic position.

Assessment and prevention of acute health effects of weather conditions in Europe, the PHEWE project: background, objectives, design.

BACKGROUND: The project "Assessment and prevention of acute health effects of weather conditions in Europe" (PHEWE) had the aim of assessing the association between weather conditions and acute health effects, during both warm and cold seasons in 16 European cities with widely differing climatic conditions and to provide information for public health policies. METHODS: The PHEWE project was a three-year pan-European collaboration between epidemiologists, meteorologists and experts in public health. Meteorological, air pollution and mortality data from 16 cities and hospital admission data from 12 cities were available from 1990 to 2000. The short-term effect on mortality/morbidity was evaluated through city-specific and pooled time series analysis. The interaction between weather and air pollutants was evaluated and health impact assessments were performed to quantify the effect on the different populations. A heat/health watch warning system to predict oppressive weather conditions and alert the population was developed in a subgroup of cities and information on existing prevention policies and of adaptive strategies was gathered. RESULTS: Main results were presented in a symposium at the conference of the International Society of Environmental Epidemiology in Paris on September 6th 2006 and will be published as scientific articles. The present article introduces the project and includes a description of the database and the framework of the applied methodology. CONCLUSION: The PHEWE project offers the opportunity to investigate the relationship between temperature and mortality in 16 European cities, representing a wide range of climatic, socio-demographic and cultural characteristics; the use of a standardized methodology allows for direct comparison between cities.