Diagnostic performance and limitation of quantitative flow ratio for functional assessment of intermediate coronary stenosis.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to simultaneously investigate diagnostic performance and limitation of quantitative flow reserve (QFR) for assessing functionally significant coronary stenosis, focusing on factors affecting diagnostic accuracy of QFR. METHODS: This study evaluated 1) QFR diagnostic accuracy compared with fractional flow reserve (FFR) in patients with stable coronary artery disease (Cohort-A, n = 95) and 2) QFR reproducibility for non-culprit lesions (NCLs) assessment between acute and staged (14±5 days later) procedures in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (Cohort-B, n = 65). All coronary angiography image acquisition was performed before the introduction of QFR system into our institution. RESULTS: Cohort-A showed good correlation (r = 0.80, p<0.0001) between QFR and FFR; diagnostic accuracy of QFR for FFR ≤0.80 was 85.2% (sensitivity 80.4%, specificity 91.0%, positive predictive value 91.1%, negative predictive value 80.0%). There were 14 lesions showing discordance between QFR and FFR, which was primarily attributable to inadequate lesion visualization due to vessel overlap/tortuosity and/or insufficient intra-coronary contrast-media injection. In Cohort-B, there was also excellent correlation between acute and staged QFR; classification agreement of acute and staged QFR was 92.3%. Five lesions showed discordance between acute and staged QFR, 4 were due to limited image acquisition and/or high coronary flow velocity at acute phase of STEMI and 1 was borderline ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: QFR-derived physiological assessment of intermediate coronary stenosis is feasible, even in the acute setting of STEMI. Adjusting some technical factors may further improve the diagnostic performance of QFR.

Prognostic significance of quantitative assessment of focal myocardial fibrosis in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of myocardial focal fibrosis quantified by late gadolinium enhanced (LGE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS: One-hundred eleven HFpEF patients (mean age: 70 ± 14 years, 55 (50%) female) were enrolled. We excluded patients with previous history of coronary artery disease and/or ischemic pattern of hyper enhancement on LGE MRI. Myocardial enhancement was defined using signal intensity >2SD above the mean signal intensity of a remote myocardium. Major adverse cardiovascular events were defined as cardiovascular death and heart failure requiring hospitalization. RESULTS: During a mean follow up period of 851 ± 609 days, 10 events (2 cardiovascular death, 8 hospitalization for heart failure decompensation) were observed. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of LGE% for the detection of future events was 0.721 (95% CI: 0.628-0.802). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that LGE% is an independent predictor of future events after the adjustment with prognostic 5 factors - age, diabetes mellitus, New York Heart Association classification, history of heart failure hospitalization and left ventricular ejection fraction - which were identified in the I-PRESERVE study (Irbesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Study) (hazard ratio=7.913, 95% CI: 1.603-39.05, P=0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Larger size of LGE was significantly associated with high rate of future cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization, suggesting that the quantification of myocardial focal fibrosis by LGE MRI could be useful for the risk stratification in HFpEF patients.