Treating Children and Adolescents With Obesity: Characteristics of Success.

Background: Factors related to clinically meaningful outcomes for pediatric patients seeking care for severe obesity are not well known. Examining patient-level and program-level characteristics related to success may inform future care. Objectives: To determine factors associated with a clinically significant reduction in weight status measured by %BMIp95 after 6 months of treatment. Study Design: This is a retrospective study of youth 5-17 years of age seeking multicomponent weight management care to determine if patient characteristics, treatment recommendations, reported adherence, and additional program-affiliated class participation are associated with 6-month change in %BMIp95. Results: Among 170 children with obesity, higher reductions in %BMIp95 were seen in those with medium-high dietary adherence compared to low-none (-10.8 vs. -4.0, p = 0.002). Post hoc analysis showed higher dietary adherence among those with private insurance than public insurance (59% vs. 41%, respectively, p = 0.04). Conclusion: Children receiving multidisciplinary multicomponent weight management, who achieve clinically meaningful outcomes, are more likely to be adherent to dietary recommendations regardless of the type. Further study is needed of how best to address social determinants of health to improve dietary adherence. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT02121132.

Establishment of the Pediatric Obesity Weight Evaluation Registry: A National Research Collaborative for Identifying the Optimal Assessment and Treatment of Pediatric Obesity.

BACKGROUND: Prospective patient registries have been successfully utilized in several disease states with a goal of improving treatment approaches through multi-institutional collaboration. The prevalence of youth with severe obesity is at a historic high in the United States, yet evidence to guide effective weight management is limited. The Pediatric Obesity Weight Evaluation Registry (POWER) was established in 2013 to identify and promote effective intervention strategies for pediatric obesity. METHODS: Sites in POWER provide multicomponent pediatric weight management (PWM) care for youth with obesity and collect a defined set of demographic and clinical parameters, which they regularly submit to the POWER Data Coordinating Center. A program profile survey was completed by sites to describe characteristics of the respective PWM programs. RESULTS: From January 2014 through December 2015, 26 US sites were enrolled in POWER and had submitted data on 3643 youth with obesity. Ninety-five percent were 6-18 years of age, 54% female, 32% nonwhite, 32% Hispanic, and 59% publicly insured. Over two-thirds had severe obesity. All sites included a medical provider and used weight status in their referral criteria. Other program characteristics varied widely between sites. CONCLUSION: POWER is an established national registry representing a diverse sample of youth with obesity participating in multicomponent PWM programs across the United States. Using high-quality data collection and a collaborative research infrastructure, POWER aims to contribute to the development of evidence-based guidelines for multicomponent PWM programs.

Parent perspectives on attrition from tertiary care pediatric weight management programs.

OBJECTIVE: To describe parent/caregiver reasons for attrition from tertiary care weight management clinics/programs. STUDY DESIGN: A telephone survey was administered to 147 parents from weight management clinics/programs in the National Association of Children's Hospitals and Related Institutions' (now Children's Hospital Association's) FOCUS on a Fitter Future II collaborative. RESULTS: Scheduling, barriers to recommendation implementation, and transportation issues were endorsed by more than half of parents as having a moderate to high influence on their decision not to return. Family motivation and mismatched expectations between families and clinic/program staff were mentioned as influential by more than one-third. Only mismatched expectations correlated with patient demographics and program characteristics. [corrected]. CONCLUSIONS: Although limited by small sample size, the study found that parents who left geographically diverse weight management clinics/programs reported similar reasons for attrition. Future efforts should include offering alternative visit times, more treatment options, and financial and transportation assistance and exploring family expectations.

Predictors of attrition from a pediatric weight management program.

OBJECTIVE: The current study examined characteristics of families who initiated weight management treatment for their obese child/adolescent and withdrew prematurely. STUDY DESIGN: Participants (body mass index > or =95(th) percentile) were enrolled in a pediatric interdisciplinary weight management clinic. Retrospective chart review revealed noncompleters (n=116) completed > or =1 visit(s) but withdrew before completion of the initial 4-month treatment phase. Completers (n=96) completed the initial treatment phase. Completers and noncompleters were compared on baseline demographic, psychological, clinical, and laboratory measures. Regression analyses assessed the degree to which these factors predicted attrition. RESULTS: Fifty-five percent of patients withdrew prematurely from treatment. Noncompleters were more likely to be Medicaid recipients, black, older, and self-report greater depressive symptomatology and lower self-concept. CONCLUSIONS: These data have implications for the design of pediatric weight management intervention models that improve the rate of completion for economically disadvantaged and minority youth. Screening for depressive symptomatology may identify patients at risk for treatment dropout who could be targeted for increased support and retention strategies.