Hospital Admissions in Pediatric Patients With Tracheostomies Based on Rurality and Insurance Status.

OBJECTIVE: Determine whether rurality or public insurance status is associated with greater 30-day readmission after tracheostomy in pediatric patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) Database. METHODS: Patients within PHIS who underwent tracheostomy from 2013 to 2017 were included. Rural status was defined by rural-urban commuting area codes. Insurance status was based on the primary payer. All-cause 30-day readmissions and tracheostomy-related readmissions were recorded. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to test for differences in readmissions between cohorts. RESULTS: Among patients, 1092 were rural, and 4329 were publicly insured, with no significant association between rurality and insurance. Compared to nonrural patients, rural patients were more frequently white, less frequently ventilator dependent, and more likely discharged home rather than to a care facility. Publicly insured patients were more frequently non-white. Twenty-eight percent of patients were readmitted within 30 days of discharge. Odds of 30-day readmission were lower in rural patients (odds ratio [OR]: 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68-0.95, p = .01) but higher in publicly insured (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.09-1.42, p = .001) controlling for age at tracheostomy, sex, race, and ventilator dependence. The odds of tracheostomy-related admission did not differ by rurality but were higher in publicly insured children (1.39, 95% CI: 1.03-1.88, p = .03). CONCLUSION: Readmission within 30 days following tracheostomy was more likely in publicly insured patients and less likely in rural patients. These findings help identify at-risk patients when considering discharge planning and follow-up. More work is needed to understand long-term tracheostomy outcomes in these groups.

Health disparities in pediatric cochlear implantation: an audiologic perspective.

OBJECTIVES: A national survey of pediatric cochlear implantation (PCI) audiologists was conducted with three aims: (1) to determine if PCI audiologists perceive within their clinical practice a negative effect of low socioeconomic status (SES) on postimplant speech and language outcomes; (2) to understand their perceptions of the underlying factors leading to outcome disparities; and (3) to elicit suggestions for improving outcomes in disadvantaged populations. We hypothesized that audiologists would perceive reduced speech and language outcomes within their lower SES patient population, and that this noted disparity would be related to parental adherence (compliance) and access to habilitation. DESIGN: A survey containing 22 quantitative and open-ended questions was electronically mailed to a data base of 234 PCI audiologists. Forty-four percent (N = 103 of 234) responded to the survey, with the majority (98 of 103) answering all questions. Quantitative responses were analyzed using the Stata 9 statistical package with significance at p < 0.05. Qualitative responses were analyzed using standardized codebook and content analysis. Transcripts were read and coded for the main ideas expressed in each response. The codes were then analyzed for patterns and organized into subthemes that were then grouped into themes. RESULTS: Seventy-eight percent (N = 76 of 98) of respondents perceived an effect of SES on postimplant speech and language outcomes. Qualitative responses uniformly demonstrated audiologists' perception that lower SES patient populations were more likely to experience reduced speech and language outcomes. Two major themes emerged in audiologists' explanations of SES-related disparities: internal factors of parental influence (i.e., parental self-efficacy, adherence, and habilitation carryover), and external factors (i.e., inadequate therapy and lack of available resources). Three primary suggestions were offered for reducing the disparity: improvement in cochlear implant services (92%), increased emphasis on parental education and intervention (87%), and the development of stricter candidacy requirements (15%). CONCLUSIONS: This study offers evidence to show that PCI audiologists note an SES-related disparity in the field of PCI. Respondents suggest the need for a broad and culturally sensitive effort to both increase access to qualified healthcare professionals and develop approaches that will aid parents in the at-home habilitation process.