Caregiver Burden of Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to review, synthesize, and grade published evidence of caregiver burden of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), a rare autosomal-recessive neuromuscular disease. METHODS: We searched Embase and PubMed for full-text articles published from inception up until 28 February, 2022, reporting results from studies of caregiver burden (i.e., negative aspects of providing informal care) in SMA. Two investigators independently screened article titles and abstracts for eligibility, reviewed full-text versions of selected records, extracted the data, and assessed risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The evidence was synthesized to answer the following questions: (1) In which geographical settings have the caregiver burden of SMA been studied? (2) What aspects of the caregiver burden of SMA have been investigated? (3) What instruments have been used to measure the caregiver burden of SMA? (4) What is known of the caregiver burden of SMA? (5) How is the caregiver burden of SMA impacted by available disease-modifying drugs? RESULTS: We identified 15 publications, covering samples from a total of ten countries (i.e., Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, Romania, Spain, Turkey, the UK, and the USA), reporting estimates of caregiver burden derived using data recorded via surveys or interviews. The most common instruments used to measure caregiver burden were the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview, the EQ-5D-5L, and the PedsQL Family Impact Model. Caregiving in SMA was found to be associated with reduced health-related quality of life, impaired family function, depression and anxiety, strain, and stress, as well as a substantial impact on work life and productivity. Evidence of the impact of disease-modifying drugs on caregiver burden in SMA was scarce. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers to patients with SMA were found to be subject to a significant burden, including impaired health-related quality of life, reduced work ability and productivity, and financial stress, and many devote a substantial proportion of their time to provide informal care. Yet, the current body of literature is relatively scarce and more research is needed to better understand the clinical implications of informal caregiving in SMA and the relationship between caregiver burden and SMA types, as well as the impact of new disease-modifying treatments. Our synthesis will be helpful in informing clinical and social support programs (e.g., the routine screening of depression among caregivers, as well as financial support schemes to help manage the long-term day-to-day care) directed towards families caring for patients with SMA.

Development and Pilot Test of the Registry Evaluation and Quality Standards Tool: An Information Technology-Based Tool to Support and Review Registries.

OBJECTIVES: Health technology assessment (HTA) bodies are increasingly making use of real-world evidence and data. High-quality registries could be an asset for this; nevertheless, there is a lack of specified standards to assess the quality of data in the registry, or the registry itself. The European Network for Health Technology Assessment Joint Action 3 led the work to develop a tool for the evaluation of clinical registries: the "Registry Evaluation and Quality Standards Tool" (REQueST). METHODS: REQueST was developed in 4 steps: (1) A partnership between HTA bodies across Europe drafted the assessment criteria. (2) Multiple rounds of consultation across HTA bodies and the public domain developed an Excel version of REQueST. (3) This version was transformed into a web-based application. (4) An external pilot tested this REQueST tool with SMArtCARE and NeuroTransData registries. RESULTS: Haute Autorité de Santé, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, and the Croatian Institute of Public Health led the development of REQueST. Another 4 HTA bodies contributed regularly to development meetings, and all European Network for Health Technology Assessment partners were invited to contribute. Eight methodological, 12 essential, and 3 supplementary criteria were identified. Both pilot registries scored well, fulfilling the requirements for >70% of criteria, with none failed. Feedback by registry holders led to streamlining of the process and clarification of the criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The REQueST tool uses an iterative and collaborative methodology with registry holders. It has the potential to maximize the utility of registry data for decision making by regulatory and HTA bodies and provides a foundation for future research.

Coagulation disorders in Duchenne muscular dystrophy? Results of a registry-based online survey.

Different complications of hemostasis have been reported in patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD). These comprise an increased rate of bleeding-symptoms during scoliosis surgery but also thromboembolic complications such as pulmonary embolism, cerebral infarction, deep vein thrombosis or cardiac thrombus. For this cross-sectional study, personalized online survey-links were forwarded to 682 registered patients with a genetically confirmed diagnosis of DMD via the German-Austrian DMD patient registry (www.dmd-register.de). The questionnaire enquired data regarding the degree of mobility, disposition to hematoma, epistaxis and gum bleeding, occurrence of peri- and postsurgical hemorrhage, stroke, deep vein thrombosis, and cardiac thromboembolism. Further data on regular medication and age were recorded. Three-hundred-fifty-one DMD-patients completed the questionnaire (response rate of 51.5%). Of those, 164 (46.7%) were ambulatory and 187 (53.3%) were non-ambulatory. Age distribution was homogeneous. Two participants had a history of thromboembolic events (0.6%). Correlations analysis revealed no coherence with the degree of mobility, age or regular medication. A bleeding tendency was reported by 76 participants (21.7%). No significant correlations with age or degree of mobility were found. We found no association with underlying genetic variants. Results of this patient registry-based survey do not indicate a distinct DMD-specific risk for thromboembolic events that exceeds the risk by typical comorbidities of chronic immobility and cardiac insufficiency in advanced stages of the disease. The results of this survey suggest a mild bleeding tendency in this DMD cohort, whereas a selection bias cannot be excluded.

Duchenne muscular dystrophy and caregiver burden: a systematic review.

AIM: To conduct a systematic literature review of caregiver burden in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). METHOD: We searched Embase, Web of Science, and PubMed for full-text articles reporting results from studies of caregiver burden in DMD. RESULTS: We identified 483 unique publications. Of these, 450 were excluded after title and abstract screening, and 12 after full-text review. A total of 21 articles were included for data synthesis. Results encompassing more than 15 aspects of caregiver burden, investigated through surveys and/or interviews across 15 countries, were identified in the literature. Caregiving in DMD was frequently associated with impaired health-related quality of life, poor sleep quality, reduced family function, depression, pain, stress, sexual dysfunction, and/or lower self-esteem, as well as a considerable impact on work life and productivity. INTERPRETATION: Providing informal care to a patient with DMD can be associated with a substantial burden. Yet, more research is needed to better understand the clinical implications of caregiving in DMD and the relationship between caregiver burden and the progression of the disease. Our data synthesis should be helpful in informing clinical and social support programmes directed to families caring for a patient with DMD. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: A substantial body of evidence describes caregiver burden in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Little is known of the family burden beyond caregivers' self-assessments.

A checklist for clinical trials in rare disease: obstacles and anticipatory actions-lessons learned from the FOR-DMD trial.

BACKGROUND: Trials in rare diseases have many challenges, among which are the need to set up multiple sites in different countries to achieve recruitment targets and the divergent landscape of clinical trial regulations in those countries. Over the past years, there have been initiatives to facilitate the process of international study set-up, but the fruits of these deliberations require time to be operationally in place. FOR-DMD (Finding the Optimum Steroid Regimen for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy) is an academic-led clinical trial which aims to find the optimum steroid regimen for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for 5 years (July 2010 to June 2015), anticipating that all sites (40 across the USA, Canada, the UK, Germany and Italy) would be open to recruitment from July 2011. However, study start-up was significantly delayed and recruitment did not start until January 2013. METHOD: The FOR-DMD study is used as an example to identify systematic problems in the set-up of international, multi-centre clinical trials. The full timeline of the FOR-DMD study, from funding approval to site activation, was collated and reviewed. Systematic issues were identified and grouped into (1) study set-up, e.g. drug procurement; (2) country set-up, e.g. competent authority applications; and (3) site set-up, e.g. contracts, to identify the main causes of delay and suggest areas where anticipatory action could overcome these obstacles in future studies. RESULTS: Time from the first contact to site activation across countries ranged from 6 to 24 months. Reasons of delay were universal (sponsor agreement, drug procurement, budgetary constraints), country specific (complexity and diversity of regulatory processes, indemnity requirements) and site specific (contracting and approvals). The main identified obstacles included (1) issues related to drug supply, (2) NIH requirements regarding contracting with non-US sites, (3) differing regulatory requirements in the five participating countries, (4) lack of national harmonisation with contracting and the requirement to negotiate terms and contract individually with each site and (5) diversity of languages needed for study materials. Additionally, as with many academic-led studies, the FOR-DMD study did not have access to the infrastructure and expertise that a contracted research organisation could provide, organisations often employed in pharmaceutical-sponsored studies. This delay impacted recruitment, challenged the clinical relevance of the study outcomes and potentially delayed the delivery of the best treatment to patients. CONCLUSION: Based on the FOR-DMD experience, and as an interim solution, we have devised a checklist of steps to not only anticipate and minimise delays in academic international trial initiation but also identify obstacles that will require a concerted effort on the part of many stakeholders to mitigate.

Long-Term Follow-Up on Health-Related Quality of Life After Mechanical Circulatory Support in Children.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate health-related quality of life in long-term survivors of mechanical circulatory support after acute cardiopulmonary failure. DESIGN: Prospective follow-up study. SETTING: Single-institutional in a center for congenital heart disease and pediatric cardiology. PATIENTS: Fifty patients who underwent 58 mechanical circulatory support therapies in our institution from 2001 to 2012. Median age was 2 (0-213) months, and median supporting time was 5 (1-234) days. Indication groups: 1) extracorporeal life support in low cardiac output: 30 cases (52%); 2) extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: 13 cases (22%); 3) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in acute respiratory distress syndrome: four cases (7%); and 4) ventricular assist devices: 11 cases (19%). INTERVENTIONS: Health-related quality of life was measured using standardized questionnaires according to the age group and completed by either parent proxies in children under 7 years old or the survivors themselves. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Fifty percentage of the patients were discharged home, and 22 long-term survivors (44%) were studied prospectively for health-related quality of life. Median follow-up period was 4.5 (0.3-11.3) years. Median age at follow-up was 5 (0.6-29) years old. Nineteen long-term survivors filled in the health-related quality of life questionnaires and were classified into three age groups: 0-4 years (n = 7): median health-related quality of life score, 69 (59-86) points; 4-12 years (n = 7): median health-related quality of life score, 50 (48-85) points; older than 12 years (n = 5): median health-related quality of life score, 90 (80-100) points. CONCLUSION: Long-term survivors' health-related quality of life as reported by their parents is lower than that of healthy children. However, the self-assessed health-related quality of life of the patients older than 12 years in our group is comparable to a healthy control population.